Ukraine struggling to hold eastern city of Pokrovsk, military analysts say

A destroyed car sits near an apartment building damaged by Russian military strike, amid Russia’s attack on Ukraine, in the frontline town of Bilozerske in Donetsk region, Oct. 27, 2025. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 30 October 2025
Follow

Ukraine struggling to hold eastern city of Pokrovsk, military analysts say

  • Moscow’s troops have in recent weeks closed in on the key logistics hub
  • “As in previous weeks, this is the area with the most intensive combat activity, with a strong concentration of Russian forces,” Zelensky said

KYIV: Ukrainian forces are struggling to fend off intensifying Russian advances on the eastern city of Pokrovsk, the military and open-source analysts said on Wednesday.
Moscow’s troops have in recent weeks closed in on the key logistics hub after more than a year of grinding advances, which Kyiv says have come at a staggering human cost to Russia.
In a statement, Ukraine’s 7th Corps said Russian forces had deployed some 11,000 troops in an attempt to encircle the greater Pokrovsk area.
Enemy groups that had already infiltrated the city were attempting to push further north and northwest, it said.

’MOST DIFFICULT’ SITUATION: ZELENSKIY
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, in his nightly video address, said the situation around Pokrovsk was “the most difficult” along the 1,250-km (775-mile) front line.
“As in previous weeks, this is the area with the most intensive combat activity, with a strong concentration of Russian forces,” Zelensky said after a discussion with Ukraine’s top commander, Oleksandr Syrskyi.
He said the situation around the northeastern city of Kupiansk “remains difficult, but our forces have more control in recent days. We are continuing to defend our positions.”
Zelensky this week said around 200 Russian troops were in various parts of Pokrovsk, whose capture he said would be critical for Moscow to demonstrate it has the upper hand on the battlefield.
Capturing Pokrovsk, as well as Kostiantynivka to its northeast, would give Moscow a platform to drive toward the two biggest remaining Ukrainian-controlled cities in Donetsk.
Also on Wednesday, Ukrainian open-source group DeepState said Russia has been able to break a military logistics route to the neighboring city of Myrnohrad through infantry ambushes and drone attacks.
It warned that Ukraine would need to deploy a brigade-level force, rather than smaller units, to block further Russian infiltration of Pokrovsk.
“The situation in Pokrovsk is on the verge of critical and continues to deteriorate to the point that fixing everything may be too late,” the group said.
It also posted what it said was footage of Ukrainian forces destroying a Russian flag that had been briefly hoisted over the city gates.
In a later update, DeepState said Russian forces were trying to infiltrate Pokrovsk and a nearby village in small groups. Russian troops, it said, had taken advantage of bad weather and identified gaps in Ukrainian defenses.
Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Wednesday Ukrainian forces were surrounded in Pokrovsk and in Kupiansk.
Ukraine’s military rejected the claim about Kupiansk as “fantasies” and said Pokrovsk had not been blockaded, adding that supply lines in the area remained intact.
Reuters was unable to independently verify battlefield reports from either side.

ZELENSKIY SAYS RUSSIAN CAMPAIGN FALTERING
Moscow has stepped up a battlefield offensive amid a stalled US-led diplomatic effort to end the war, now well into its fourth year after Russia’s February 2022 full-scale invasion.
The Kremlin has repeatedly demanded that Ukraine cede its entire Donbas region, where Pokrovsk is located, as a precondition for peace talks — something Kyiv has rejected.
Speaking to reporters on Monday, Zelensky said Russia’s year-long effort to capture Pokrovsk showed that it was unable to accomplish its goal of militarily seizing the rest of the region.
“That’s why the fact that we hold Pokrovsk and that they continue to put off the plans for their (wider) campaign proves to the world that they are lying.”


Trump insists he struck Iran on his own terms

Updated 04 March 2026
Follow

Trump insists he struck Iran on his own terms

  • “We are now a nation divided between those who want to fight wars for Israel and those who just want peace and to be able to afford their bills and health insurance,” Marjorie Taylor Greene posted on X.
  • Rubio himself doubled down on Tuesday after meeting with US House and Senate members, while insisting that “No, I told you this had to happen anyway”

WASHINGTON, United States: President Donald Trump and his team scrambled Tuesday to reclaim the narrative on why he decided to attack Iran, after his top diplomat suggested the US struck only after learning of an imminent Israeli strike.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio alarmed Democrats — who say only Congress can declare war — as well as many of Trump’s MAGA supporters on Monday when he said: “We knew that there was going to be an Israeli action.”
“We knew that that would precipitate an attack against American forces, and we knew that if we didn’t pre-emptively go after them before they launched those attacks, we would suffer higher casualties,” Rubio told reporters.
Administration officials quickly backpedalled, insisting Trump authorized the strikes because Tehran was not seriously negotiating an accord on limiting its nuclear ambitions, and the United States needed to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities.
“No, Marco Rubio Didn’t Claim That Israel Dragged Trump into War with Iran,” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt posted Tuesday on X.
At an Oval Office meeting later with Germany’s chancellor, Trump went further, saying that “Based on the way the negotiation was going, I think they (Iran) were going to attack first. And I didn’t want that to happen.”
“So, if anything, I might have forced Israel’s hand.”

- Had to happen? -

Rubio himself doubled down on Tuesday after meeting with US House and Senate members, while insisting that “No, I told you this had to happen anyway.”
“The president made a decision. The decision he made was that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide... behind this ability to conduct an attack.”
Critics seized on the muddied messaging to accuse Trump of precipitating the country into a war without a clear rationale, without informing Congress — and without a clear idea of how it might end.
They noted that just two weeks ago, Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pressed Trump again in Washington to take a hard line, in their seventh meeting since Trump’s return to power last year.
Some Republican allies rallied behind the president, with Senator Tom Cotton, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, insisting that “No one pushes or drags Donald Trump anywhere.”
“He acts in the vital national security interest of the United States,” Cotton told the “Fox & Friends” morning show.
But as crucial US midterm elections approach that could see Republicans lose their congressional majority, Trump risks shedding supporters who had welcomed his pledge to end foreign military interventions.
“We are now a nation divided between those who want to fight wars for Israel and those who just want peace and to be able to afford their bills and health insurance,” Marjorie Taylor Greene, a top former Trump ally and a major figure in the populist and isolationist hard right, posted on X.