On board the Cold War-style sealed train from Moscow to Kaliningrad

A train conductor is seen in a carriage of the Yantar (Amber) train en route from Moscow to Kaliningrad. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 29 October 2025
Follow

On board the Cold War-style sealed train from Moscow to Kaliningrad

  • Lithuania earlier this month issued a diplomatic protest at Moscow over an alleged brief incursion into its airspace by two military planes stationed in Kaliningrad
  • Moscow has also bristled at what it calls threats by Vilnius to cut off land transit routes

KALININGRAD: As the Moscow-Kaliningrad train approached Lithuania, the car attendant beckoned to passengers in Russian: “I’m closing the entire carriage, the toilets are out of action.”
The 19-hour, 1,000-kilometer (650-mile) journey is the only land route between mainland Russia and its coastal exclave of Kaliningrad, wedged on the Baltic Sea between EU and NATO members Poland and Lithuania.
In echoes of the Cold War, passengers on the “Yantar,” the Russian word for amber, are locked inside for the three hours it spends traversing Lithuania.
The Baltic state has been one of Europe’s most pro-Kyiv voices, pushing for a hard line against Russia since it ordered troops into Ukraine in February 2022. Moscow sees it as a hostile state.
Doors and windows are sealed — to prevent Russians jumping off and escaping, Vilnius says. The toilets are only open for use while the train is speeding along, not when it stops.
“The border with Lithuania is in 30 minutes,” the assistant shouted to rouse slumbering passengers.
Though the train is half-empty, sleeping quarters are cramped and heating is blasted to the max.
Russian citizens need a visa for the EU’s Schengen zone or a special transit permit for the journey, even if they cannot set foot outside the train.
“Sometimes there are even fewer passengers. Traveling has become complicated since 2022,” one attendant, speaking anonymously, told AFP on a recent journey.
“Neither EU citizens nor Russian citizens are allowed to leave the transit train,” except in “urgent humanitarian reasons,” like if a passenger falls seriously ill, Lithuania’s State Border Guard Service told AFP in written comments.
For that reason, “the doors and windows are sealed,” an agent of the EU’s Frontex border force told AFP at a checkpoint en route.
“In the past, Russians found ways to get off the train and vanish into the wild,” the agent, speaking on condition of anonymity as he was not authorized to speak to media, told AFP as he went between compartments checking documents.

- ‘Hot war’ -

On board, Nikolai was keeping an eye on a package slid under his bunk.
“It’s for my mum, she lives in Kaliningrad,” he told AFP.
He opted for the train to save money — 4,000 rubles ($50), compared to 10,000 ($125) for a flight — despite the hassle.
“It’s a little similar to the Cold War. But now it’s more of a hot war with the West,” he said.
From the Russian perspective, Kaliningrad, home to around one million people, has become something of a front line in its standoff with the West.
It is the headquarters of the Russian Baltic fleet and hosts Iskander nuclear-capable ballistic missiles.
To fly between the exclave and the Russian capital, planes are forced on an hours-long detour northwards, through the Gulf of Finland, due to a ban on Russian commercial planes using EU airspace.
Lithuania earlier this month issued a diplomatic protest at Moscow over an alleged brief incursion into its airspace by two military planes stationed in Kaliningrad. Moscow has also bristled at what it calls threats by Vilnius to cut off land transit routes.
And Baltic neighbor Estonia said in September that Russian jets had violated its airspace for 12 minutes, prompting US President Donald Trump to say NATO should shoot down Russian planes that encroach members’ airspace.

- ‘Do you agree?’ -

Undergoing border checks at the Kena station, Lithuania also makes sure the Russians onboard have no doubt about its allegiances.
“Putin is killing Ukrainian civilians. Do you agree with it?” a poster facing into the train reads in Russian.
Photos of destroyed Ukrainian cities plaster the platform fence.
Two years ago, Lithuanian media were reporting several cases of Russians using the stop as their “window to Europe.”
The toilets are reopened as the train leaves Kena, only to be locked again a few hours later at the Kybartai border checkpoint, the exit point from Lithuania.
Russian border guards embark, subjecting non-Russian passengers to a barrage of questions.
“It’s their job to be curious,” said Vladimir, a retiree traveling with his wife, Irina. “Especially with foreigners.”
As the Yantar pulled into its final stop in Kaliningrad, and the doors unsealed for the final time, he puffed up: “We fear nothing. We are brave.”


US judge rejects Trump administration’s halt of wind energy permits

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

US judge rejects Trump administration’s halt of wind energy permits

  • 17 Democratic-led states challenged the suspension
  • Offshore wind group supports ruling for economic and energy priorities
BOSTON: A federal judge on Monday struck down an order by US President Donald Trump’s administration to halt all federal approvals for new wind energy projects, saying that agencies’ efforts to implement his directive were unlawful and arbitrary.
Agencies including the US Departments of the Interior and Commerce and the Environmental Protection Agency have been implementing a directive to halt all new approvals needed for both onshore and offshore wind projects pending a review of leasing and permitting practices.
Siding with a group of 17 Democratic-led states and the District of Columbia, US District Judge Patti Saris in Boston said those agencies had failed to provide reasoned explanations for the actions they took to carry out the directive Trump issued on his first day back in office on January 20.
They could not lawfully under the Administrative Procedure Act indefinitely decline to review applications for permits, added Saris, who was appointed by Democratic President Bill Clinton.
New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat whose state led the legal challenge, called the ruling “a big victory in our fight to keep tackling the climate crisis” in a social media post.
White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers said in a statement that Trump through his order had “unleashed America’s energy dominance to protect our economic and national security.”
Trump has sought to boost government support for fossil fuels and maximize output in the United States, the world’s top oil and gas producer, after campaigning for the presidency on the refrain of “drill, baby, drill.”
The states, led by New York, sued in May, after the Interior Department ordered Norway’s Equinor to halt construction on its Empire Wind offshore wind project off the coast of New York.
While the administration allowed work on Empire Wind to resume, the states say the broader pause on permitting and leasing continues to have harmful economic effects.
The states said the agencies implementing Trump’s order never said why they were abruptly changing longstanding policy supporting wind energy development.
Saris agreed, saying the policy “constitutes a change of course from decades of agencies issuing (or denying) permits related to wind energy projects.”
The defendants “candidly concede that the sole factor they considered in deciding to stop issuing permits was the President’s direction to do so,” Saris wrote.
An offshore wind energy trade group welcomed the ruling.
“Overturning the unlawful blanket halt to offshore wind permitting activities is needed to achieve our nation’s energy and economic priorities of bringing more power online quickly, improving grid reliability, and driving billions of new American steel manufacturing and shipbuilding investments,” Oceantic Network CEO Liz Burdock said in a statement.