UN expert says Western nations share blame for Gaza genocide, calls UN ‘more and more irrelevant’

Francesca Albanese, the UN’s special rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories, said on Tuesday that Western nations share responsibility for the devastation in Gaza. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 29 October 2025
Follow

UN expert says Western nations share blame for Gaza genocide, calls UN ‘more and more irrelevant’

  • Human rights investigator Francesca Albanese says UN has ‘failed miserably’ to uphold international law and protect civilians in Gaza
  • She criticizes governments for not challenging the US over its ‘unlawful and spiteful’ sanctions on her over her investigations into human rights abuses against Palestinians
  • Asked by Arab News if the crisis threatens UN’s survival, she says it ‘is apocalyptic’ and ‘revealing who we are, as individuals, as communities, as states, as organizations’

NEW YORK CITY: A UN human rights investigator said Western nations share responsibility for the devastation in Gaza. She accused them of enabling a “full-fledged genocide” against Palestinians, and warned that the UN itself is becoming “more and more irrelevant.”
Francesca Albanese, the UN’s special rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories, presented her latest report to the General Assembly’s Third Committee on Tuesday.
She said that the UN had “failed miserably” to uphold international law and protect civilians in Gaza.
“The United Nations was set up to protect peace and stability, to prevent conflicts, and for a long time it did,” Albanese told Arab News.
“But in Gaza, it has failed miserably … it has failed to enforce international law, which for me as a lawyer is the most serious responsibility.”
The UN had allowed the “near-complete dismantlement of its humanitarian function” in Gaza, she continued, citing in particular the blow suffered by the organization’s agency for Palestinian refugees, UNRWA. Israel banned the agency from operating in Israel and Palestinian territories in January this year following allegations that a small number of its staff were involved in the Oct. 7 attacks.
“Member states have not been able to contain or isolate the two states creating a threat to peace and security in the region: Israel and the United States,” Albanese said.
“I’m sorry to say this because, of course, I would like to see the United Nations rise and straighten its back and stand solid and principled into the future. But the United Nations is becoming more and more irrelevant, I’m afraid.”
Albanese also criticized world governments for failing to challenge the US over the sanctions it imposed on her in July over her work for the UN investigating human rights abuses in Palestinian territories. The measures hindered her ability to present her latest findings in person.
Speaking to the General Assembly committee via video link from South Africa, she described the sanctions as “unlawful and spiteful” and said the international community “should already have confronted this dangerous precedent.”
She added: “These measures are an assault on the UN itself — on its independence, its integrity, its very soul,” she said.
Asked whether UN officials, including Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, had supported her during this period, Albanese declined to comment.
Her report accuses Western governments of providing military, political and economic support that has sustained Israel’s occupation and military campaign in Gaza.
“Without the direct participation, aid and assistance of other states, the prolonged unlawful Israeli occupation could not have been sustained,” she said.
Israel’s actions in Gaza since October 2023 “have escalated its violence to an unprecedented level,” she continued, and “the ongoing genocide of the Palestinians must be understood as an internationally enabled crime.”
Albanese told the committee: “Many states, primarily Western ones, have facilitated, legitimized and eventually normalized the genocidal campaign perpetrated by Israel.
“By portraying Palestinian civilians as ‘human shields,’ and the broader onslaught in Gaza as a battle of civilization against barbarism, they have reproduced Israeli distortions of international law, and colonial tropes.”
Asked by Arab News whether the crisis threatens “the survival of the UN itself,” Albanese said the situation “is apocalyptic … it’s showing the apocalyptic destruction in Gaza, but also revealing who we are, as individuals, as communities, as states, as organizations.”
Despite her criticisms, Albanese said international law “still has a different story — it allows us to distinguish between wrong and right.” She added that “today, international law is spoken by the masses: against genocide, against apartheid, against Israel’s crimes.”
She urged all governments to “immediately suspend and review all military, diplomatic and economic relations with Israel, as any such engagement could represent means to aid, assist or directly participate in unlawful acts, including war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.”
She warned that “no state can credibly claim adherence to international law while arming, supporting or shielding a genocidal regime.”
Among her recommendations, Albanese called on UN member states to “exert pressure for a complete and permanent ceasefire and full withdrawal of Israeli troops,” to end the siege of Gaza and reopen its airport and port, and to “suspend Israel from the United Nations under Article 6 of the UN Charter.” Article 6 states that a member state that persistently violates the principles of the Charter can be expelled by the General Assembly.
She said: “Complicity in genocide must end. The world is watching Gaza, and the whole of Palestine. States must step up to their responsibilities.”
Israel’s ambassador to the UN, Danny Danon, rejected Albanese’s findings.
“You have tried to curse Israel with lies and hatred but your poison has failed,” he told her during the committee session. “You are a witch and this report is another page in your spell book.
“You wrap your bias in the language of law, hoping it will hide what it really is: Hamas propaganda.”
Special rapporteurs are part of what is known as the special procedures of the UN Human Rights Council. They are independent experts who work on a voluntary basis, are not members of UN staff and are not paid for their work.


US and Iran slide towards conflict as military buildup eclipses nuclear talks

Updated 28 min 13 sec ago
Follow

US and Iran slide towards conflict as military buildup eclipses nuclear talks

  • Washington building up one of its biggest military deployments in the region since the invasion of Iraq in 2003
  • Iran is expected to submit a written proposal in the coming days, a US official says

Iran and the United States are sliding rapidly towards military conflict as hopes fade for a diplomatic solution to their standoff over Tehran’s nuclear program, officials on both sides and diplomats across the Gulf and Europe say.

Iran’s Gulf neighbors and its enemy Israel now consider a conflict to be more likely than a settlement, these sources say, with Washington building up one of its biggest military deployments in the region since the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

Israel’s government believes Tehran and Washington are at an impasse and is making preparations for possible joint military action with the United States, though no decision has been made yet on whether to carry out such an operation, said a source familiar with the planning.

It would be the second time the US and Israel have attacked Iran in less than a year, following US and Israeli airstrikes against military and nuclear facilities last June.

Regional officials say oil-producing Gulf countries are preparing for a possible military confrontation that they fear could spin out of control and destabilize the Middle East.

Two Israeli officials told Reuters they believe the gaps between Washington and Tehran are unbridgeable and that the chances of a near‑term military escalation are high.

Some regional officials say Tehran is dangerously miscalculating by holding out for concessions, with US President Donald Trump boxed in by his own military buildup - unable to scale it back without losing face if there is no firm commitment from Iran to abandon its nuclear weapons ambitions.

“Both sides are sticking to their guns,” said Alan Eyre, a former US diplomat and Iran specialist, adding that nothing meaningful can emerge “unless the US and Iran walk back from their red lines - which I don’t think they will.”

“What Trump can’t do is assemble all this military, and then come back with a ‘so‑so’ deal and pull out the military. I think he thinks he’ll lose face,” he said. “If he attacks, it’s going to get ugly quickly.”

Two rounds of Iran-US talks have stalled on core issues, from uranium enrichment to missiles and sanctions relief.

When Omani mediators delivered an envelope from the US side containing missile‑related proposals, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi refused even to open it and returned it, a source familiar with the talks said.

After talks in Geneva on Tuesday, Araghchi said the sides had agreed on “guiding principles,” but the White House said there was still distance between them.

Iran is expected to submit a written proposal in the coming days, a US official said, and Araghchi said on Friday he expected to have a draft counterproposal ready within days.

But Trump, who has sent aircraft carriers, warships and jets to the Middle East, warned Iran on Thursday it must make a deal over its nuclear program or “really bad things” will happen.

He appeared to set a deadline of 10 to 15 days, drawing a threat from Tehran to retaliate against US bases in the region if attacked. The rising tensions have pushed up oil prices.

US officials say Trump has yet to make up his mind about using military force although he acknowledged on Friday that he could order a limited strike to try to force Iran into a deal.

“I guess I can say I am considering that,” he told reporters.

The possible timing of an attack is unclear. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio is due to meet Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on February 28 to discuss Iran. A senior US official said it would be mid-March before all US forces were in place.