US says two dead in strike on alleged drug-smuggling boat in Pacific

1 / 2
A new US strike on an alleged drug-smuggling boat killed two people, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Wednesday, announcing the first such attack on a vessel operating in the Pacific Ocean. (AFP)
2 / 2
This screen grab from a video posted by US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on X on Oct. 22, 2025, shows what Hegseth says is US military forces conducting a strike on a vessel being operated by a “designated terrorist organization conducting narco-trafficking” in the Eastern Pacific Ocean on Oct. 21, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 22 October 2025
Follow

US says two dead in strike on alleged drug-smuggling boat in Pacific

  • The strike brings the total number to at least eight, leaving at least 34 people dead
  • “There were two narco-terrorists aboard the vessel during the strike, which was conducted in international waters. Both terrorists were killed,” Hegseth said

WASHINGTON: A new US strike on an alleged drug-smuggling boat killed two people, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Wednesday, announcing Washington’s first such attack on a vessel in the Pacific Ocean.
The strike — which Hegseth announced in a post on X that featured a video of a boat being engulfed in flames — brings the total number to at least eight, leaving at least 34 people dead.
“There were two narco-terrorists aboard the vessel during the strike, which was conducted in international waters. Both terrorists were killed and no US forces were harmed in this strike,” Hegseth said of Tuesday’s action in the eastern Pacific.

“Just as Al-Qaeda waged war on our homeland, these cartels are waging war on our border and our people. There will be no refuge or forgiveness — only justice,” he wrote.
President Donald Trump’s administration has said in a notice to Congress that the United States is engaged in “armed conflict” with Latin American drug cartels, describing them as terrorist groups as part of its justification for the strikes.
“The president determined these cartels are non-state armed groups, designated them as terrorist organizations, and determined that their actions constitute an armed attack against the United States,” said the notice from the Pentagon, which also described suspected smugglers as “unlawful combatants.”
But Washington has not released evidence to support its assertion that the targets of its strikes are drug smugglers, and experts say the summary killings are illegal even if they target confirmed narcotics traffickers.

- Regional tensions -

There were survivors of a US strike for the first time last week, but Washington chose to repatriate them rather than put them on trial for their alleged crimes.
Ecuador released one after finding no evidence that he had committed a crime, while authorities in Colombia said the other — who “arrived with brain trauma, sedated, drugged, breathing with a ventilator” — would face prosecution.
The US military campaign — which has seen Washington deploy stealth warplanes and Navy ships as part of what it says are counter-narcotics efforts — has fueled tensions with countries in the region.
This is especially the case with Venezuela, where the buildup of US forces has sparked fears that the ultimate goal is the overthrow of President Nicolas Maduro, whom Washington accuses of heading a drug cartel.
The United States has not specified the origin of all the vessels it has targeted, but has said that some of them came from Venezuela.
Meanwhile, a public feud between Trump and Colombia’s leftist leader Gustavo Petro intensified in recent weeks over the Republican president’s deadly anti-drug campaign.
Trump on Sunday vowed to end all aid to the South American nation — a historically close US partner and the world’s leading cocaine producer — and branded Petro, who has accused the US president of murder, as an “illegal drug dealer.”
But just days later, the Colombian president met with the top US diplomat in his country to discuss counter-narcotics efforts, with Bogota’s foreign ministry saying the two sides “reaffirmed the commitment of both parties to improve drug fighting strategies.”


Bangladesh votes in world’s first Gen Z-inspired election

Updated 51 min 24 sec ago
Follow

Bangladesh votes in world’s first Gen Z-inspired election

  • Ousted PM Hasina’s Awami League party banned
  • BNP, Jamaat in close race with big economic, geopolitical stakes

DHAKA: For years under former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, Bangladesh’s opposition had little presence on the streets during elections, either boycotting polls or being sidelined by mass arrests of senior leaders. ​Now, ahead of Thursday’s vote, the roles have reversed.
Hasina’s Awami League is banned, but many young people who helped oust her government in a 2024 uprising say the upcoming vote will be the Muslim-majority nation’s first competitive election since 2009, when she began a 15-year-rule.
The Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) is widely expected to win, although a coalition led by the Islamist Jamaat-e-Islami is putting up a strong challenge. A new party driven by Gen-Z activists under the age of 30 has aligned with Jamaat after failing to translate its anti-Hasina street mobilization into an electoral base.
BNP chief Tarique Rahman told Reuters his party, which is contesting 292 of the 300 parliamentary seats at stake, was confident of winning “enough to form a government.”

Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) chairman Tarique Rahman speaks during an election campaign rally, ahead of the national election at Pallabi, in Dhaka, Bangladesh, on February 8, 2026. (Reuters)

Analysts say a decisive result in the February 12 vote, instead of a fractured outcome, is vital for restoring ‌stability in the nation of ‌175 million after Hasina’s ouster triggered months of unrest and disrupted major industries, including ‌the garments ⁠sector ​in the ‌world’s second-largest exporter.
The verdict will also affect the roles of rival regional heavyweights China and India in the South Asian nation.
“Opinion polls suggest the BNP has an edge, but we must remember that a significant portion of voters are still undecided,” said Parvez Karim Abbasi, executive director at Dhaka’s Center for Governance Studies.
“Several factors will shape the outcome, including how Generation Z — which makes up about a quarter of the electorate — votes, as their choices will carry considerable weight.”
Across Bangladesh, black-and-white posters and banners bearing the BNP’s “sheaf of paddy” symbol and Jamaat’s “scales” hang from poles and trees and are pasted on roadside walls, alongside those of several independent candidates. Party shacks on street corners, draped in their emblems, blare campaign songs.
It marks a sharp ⁠contrast with past elections, when the Awami League’s “boat” symbol dominated the landscape.
Opinion polls expect the once-banned Jamaat, which had opposed Bangladesh’s India-backed 1971 independence from Pakistan, to have its best electoral ‌performance even if it does not win.

China’s influence increases as India’s wanes
The election verdict ‍will also influence the roles of China and India in Bangladesh ‍in coming years, analysts have said. Beijing has increased its standing in Bangladesh since Hasina was seen as pro-India and fled to ‍New Delhi after her ouster, where she remains.
While New Delhi’s influence is on the wane, the BNP is seen by some analysts as being relatively more in tune with India than the Jamaat.
A Jamaat-led government might tilt closer to Pakistan, a fellow Muslim-majority nation and a long-standing rival of Hindu-majority India, analysts say. Also, Jamaat’s Gen-Z ally has said “New Delhi’s hegemony” in Bangladesh is one of its main concerns and its leaders met Chinese diplomats recently.
Jamaat, which calls ​for a society governed by Islamic principles, has said the party is not inclined toward any country.
BNP’s Rahman has said if his party formed the government it would have friendly relations with any nation that “offers what is suitable for ⁠my people and my country.”
Bangladesh, one of the world’s most densely populated countries with high rates of extreme poverty, has been hit by high inflation, weakening reserves and slowing investment, which has pushed it to seek large-scale external financing since 2022, including billions of dollars from the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.

Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) chairman Tarique Rahman attends an election campaign rally, ahead of the national election at Pallabi, in Dhaka 

Corruption is the biggest concern among the 128 million voters, followed by inflation, according to a survey by Dhaka-based think tanks Communication & Research Foundation and Bangladesh Election and Public Opinion Studies.
Analysts say Jamaat’s clean image is a factor in its favor, much more than its Islamic leanings.
“Voters report high intention to participate, prioritize corruption and economic concerns over religious or symbolic issues, and express clear expectations for leaders who demonstrate care, competence and accountability,” said the survey.
Nevertheless, BNP’s Rahman, son of former Prime Minister Khaleda Zia, is seen as the frontrunner to lead the next government. But if the Jamaat-led coalition emerges ahead, its chair, Shafiqur Rahman, could be in line for the top job.
Mohammad Rakib, 21, who is set to vote for the first time, said he hoped the next government would allow people to express their views and exercise their franchise freely.
“Everyone ‌was tired of (Hasina’s) Awami League. People couldn’t even vote during national elections. People had no voice,” he said. “I hope the next government, whoever comes into power, will ensure this freedom of expression.”