Half of Filipinos want Duterte to face ICC trial over drug war deaths: survey

Former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte is seen on a screen in the courtroom during his first appearance before the International Criminal Court in The Hague on March 14, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 13 October 2025
Follow

Half of Filipinos want Duterte to face ICC trial over drug war deaths: survey

  • 32% of respondents disagreed that Duterte should be held accountable
  • Last week, ICC rejected the former president’s appeal for interim release

MANILA: Half of Filipinos believe former President Rodrigo Duterte should be held accountable at the International Criminal Court over his controversial anti-drug campaign, an opinion poll showed on Monday.

Duterte, 80, has been in ICC custody since March, awaiting trial in relation to his administration’s “war on drugs” from 2016 to 2022, which ICC prosecutors estimate had resulted in the extrajudicial killing of 30,000 people.

The new survey, conducted by Social Weather Stations, an independent Philippine polling group, asked respondents how much they “agree or disagree that former President Rodrigo Duterte should be held accountable in the International Criminal Court for the killings related to illegal drugs during his administration?”

It found that 50 percent of respondents agreed Duterte should be held responsible, 32 percent disagreed, 15 percent were undecided and 4 percent said they did not know enough to answer.

Support for accountability was highest in Visayas, 54 percent, and Metro Manila, 53 percent. In Mindanao – where the former president traces his political roots and despite detention won the mayoral election in May – the support for his trial was the lowest at 39 percent.

The survey was conducted nationwide from Sept. 24-30, sampling 1,500 adults with a margin of error of three percentage points.

It comes as the ICC last week rejected Duterte’s appeal for interim release.

In a ruling issued on Friday, the court’s pre-trial chamber said it found that Duterte’s detention “remains necessary” to ensure his appearance at trial, prevent him from obstructing the investigation or proceedings and to stop potential commission of further crimes.

It cited Duterte’s repeated rejection of the court’s authority and public statements by his family, including Vice President Sara Duterte, and supporters.

“More specifically, the chamber notes that on July 19, 2025, Mr. Duterte’s daughter mentioned in public speeches the idea of breaking Mr. Duterte out of the ICC Detention Center,” the ruling said.

The Philippines withdrew from the ICC in 2019, as the court’s prosecutors began to investigate Duterte’s “war on drugs.” Despite the withdrawal, the court has issued an arrest warrant against the former president, as it still keeps jurisdiction over alleged crimes committed while the country was a member.


Trump sues the BBC for defamation over editing of January 6 speech, seeks up to $10 billion in damages

Updated 16 December 2025
Follow

Trump sues the BBC for defamation over editing of January 6 speech, seeks up to $10 billion in damages

  • A BBC spokesperson told Reuters earlier on Monday that it had “no further contact from President Trump’s lawyers at this point
  • The BBC is funded through a mandatory license fee on all TV viewers, which UK lawyers say could make any payout to Trump politically fraught

WASHING: President Donald Trump sued the BBC on Monday for defamation over edited clips of a speech that made it appear he directed supporters to storm the US Capitol, opening an international front in his fight against media coverage he deems untrue or unfair. Trump accused Britain’s publicly owned broadcaster of defaming him by splicing together parts of a January 6, 2021 speech, including one section where he told supporters to march on the Capitol and another where he said “fight like hell.” It omitted a section in which he called for peaceful protest.
Trump’s lawsuit alleges the BBC defamed him and violated a Florida law that bars deceptive and unfair trade practices. He is seeking $5 billion in damages for each of the lawsuit’s two counts. The BBC has apologized to Trump, admitted an error of judgment and acknowledged that the edit gave the mistaken impression that he had made a direct call for violent action. But it has said there is no legal basis to sue.
Trump, in his lawsuit filed Monday in Miami federal court, said the BBC despite its apology “has made no showing of actual remorse for its wrongdoing nor meaningful institutional changes to prevent future journalistic abuses.”
The BBC is funded through a mandatory license fee on all TV viewers, which UK lawyers say could make any payout to Trump politically fraught.
A spokesman for Trump’s legal team said in a statement the BBC “has a long pattern of deceiving its audience in coverage of President Trump, all in service of its own leftist political agenda.”
A BBC spokesperson told Reuters earlier on Monday that it had “no further contact from President Trump’s lawyers at this point. Our position remains the same.” The broadcaster did not immediately respond to a request for comment after the lawsuit was filed.

CRISIS LED TO RESIGNATIONS
Facing one of the biggest crises in its 103-year history, the BBC has said it has no plans to rebroadcast the documentary on any of its platforms.
The dispute over the clip, featured on the BBC’s “Panorama” documentary show shortly before the 2024 presidential election, sparked a public relations crisis for the broadcaster, leading to the resignations of its two most senior officials.
Trump’s lawyers say the BBC caused him overwhelming reputational and financial harm.
The documentary drew scrutiny after the leak of a BBC memo by an external standards adviser that raised concerns about how it was edited, part of a wider investigation of political bias at the publicly funded broadcaster.
The documentary was not broadcast in the United States.
Trump may have sued in the US because defamation claims in Britain must be brought within a year of publication, a window that has closed for the “Panorama” episode.
To overcome the US Constitution’s legal protections for free speech and the press, Trump will need to prove not only that the edit was false and defamatory but also that the BBC knowingly misled viewers or acted recklessly.
The broadcaster could argue that the documentary was substantially true and its editing decisions did not create a false impression, legal experts said. It could also claim the program did not damage Trump’s reputation.
Other media have settled with Trump, including CBS and ABC when Trump sued them following his comeback win in the November 2024 election.
Trump has filed lawsuits against the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and a newspaper in Iowa, all three of which have denied wrongdoing. The attack on the US Capitol in January 2021 was aimed at blocking Congress from certifying Joe Biden’s presidential win over Trump in the 2020 US election.