Trio wins physics Nobel for quantum mechanical tunnelling

John Clarke (UK), Michel H. Devoret (France) and John M. Martinis (US) win the Nobel Prize in Physics 2025, ‘for the discovery of macroscopic quatum mechanical tunnelling and energy quantization in an electric circuit’, it was announced on October 7, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 07 October 2025
Follow

Trio wins physics Nobel for quantum mechanical tunnelling

  • The Nobel jury noted that their work had “provided opportunities for developing the next generation of quantum technology”
  • Quantum mechanics describes how differently things work on incredibly small scales

STOCKHOLM: Briton John Clarke, Frenchman Michel Devoret and American John Martinis won the Nobel Prize in Physics on Tuesday for putting quantum mechanics into action and enabling the development of all kinds of digital technology from cellphones to a new generation of computers
The Nobel jury noted that their work had “provided opportunities for developing the next generation of quantum technology, including quantum cryptography, quantum computers and quantum sensors.”
Quantum mechanics describes how differently things work on incredibly small scales.
For example, when a normal ball hits a wall, it bounces back. But on the quantum scale, a particle will actually pass straight through a comparable wall — a phenomenon called “tunnelling.”
“What these scientists were able to do was to basically do that, but on an electric circuit,” Ulf Danielsson, secretary of the Nobel physics committee and a professor of theoretical physics at Uppsala University, told AFP.
In experiments carried out in the 1980s, the scientists showed that quantum tunnelling can also be observed on a macroscopic scale — involving multiple particles — by using superconductors.
“This prize is awarding an experiment that brings the scale up to the macroscopic scale, scales that we can understand and measure through human standards,” Danielsson said.

- ‘Surprise of my life’ -

“It is also enormously useful, as quantum mechanics is the foundation of all digital technology,” Olle Eriksson, chair of the Nobel Committee for Physics, said in a statement.
Clarke, 83, is a professor at the University of California, Berkeley.
Devoret, 72, is a professor at University of California, Santa Barbara and is listed as a professor emeritus at Yale University.
Martinis, born 1958, is also a professor at the University of California, Santa Barbara.
“To put it mildly, it was the surprise of my life,” Clarke told reporters via telephone during the prize announcement, about learning of his award.
Clarke explained that the scientists had been focused on the physics of their experiments and had not realized at the time the practical applications that could follow.
“It certainly had not occurred to us in any way that this discovery would have such a significant impact,” Clarke said.
Asked about how their discoveries had affected everyday life, Clarke noted that he was speaking to the audience via his mobile phone.
“One of the underlying reasons that the cell phone works is because of all this work,” Clarke said.
- ‘Brain drain’ -

In a subsequent interview with the Nobel Foundation, Clarke stressed that the discovery was a joint effort.
“I could not imagine accepting the prize without the two of them,” he said.
Like many Nobel laureates, the trio’s research was carried out in the United States.
Major US institutions typically dominate the Nobel science prizes, due largely to the US’ longstanding investment in basic science and academic freedoms.
“The fact that Michel Devoret went to the US is an example of the brain drain,” Eleanor Crane, a quantum physicist at King’s College London, told AFP.
But at the same time, Crane noted that this trend “is being reverted right now with a new administration.”
Massive US budget cuts to science programs announced by President Donald Trump have raised fears that the United States’ may lose its scientific edge.
The physics prize is the second Nobel of the season, following Monday’s medicine prize to a US-Japanese trio for research into the human immune system.
Mary Brunkow and Fred Ramsdell of the United States and Japan’s Shimon Sakaguchi were honored for identifying immunological “security guards.”
The physics prize will be followed by the chemistry prize on Wednesday, the literature prize on Thursday, and the highly watched Nobel Peace Prize on Friday.
The economics prize wraps up the 2025 Nobel season on October 13.
The Nobel consists of a diploma, a gold medal and a $1.2-million cheque, to be shared if there is more than one winner in a discipline.
The 2025 laureates will receive their prizes at formal ceremonies in Stockholm and Oslo on December 10, the anniversary of the death in 1896 of scientist Alfred Nobel, who created the prizes in his will.


Trump targets non-white immigrants in renewed xenophobic rants

Updated 43 min 38 sec ago
Follow

Trump targets non-white immigrants in renewed xenophobic rants

  • During a rally in Pennsylvania on Wednesday,  Trump doubled down on his tirade against Somali migrants
  • "Why is it we only take people from shithole countries,’ right? Trump told his cheering audience

WASHINGTON: Back in 2018, President Donald Trump disputed having used the epithet “shithole” to describe some countries whose citizens emigrated to the United States.
Nowadays, he embraces it and pushes his anti-immigrant and xenophobic tirades even further.
Case in point: during a rally in the northeastern state of Pennsylvania on Wednesday that was supposed to focus on his economic policy, the 79-year-old Republican openly ranted and reused the phrase that had sparked an outcry during his first term.
“We had a meeting and I said, ‘Why is it we only take people from shithole countries,’ right? ‘Why can’t we have some people from Norway, Sweden?’” Trump told his cheering audience.
“But we always take people from Somalia,” he continued. “Places that are a disaster. Filthy, dirty, disgusting, ridden with crime.”
Recently, he called Somali immigrants “trash.”
These comments are “more proof of his racist, anti-immigrant agenda,” Massachusetts Senator Ed Markey responded on X.

The Trump megaphone

Florida Republican lawmaker Randy Fine, on the other hand, defended Trump.
“Not all cultures are equal and not all countries are equal,” he said on CNN, adding “the president speaks in language that Americans understand, he is blunt.”
University of Albany history professor Carl Bon Tempo told AFP this type of anti-immigrant rhetoric has long thrived on the far-right.
“The difference is now it’s coming directly out of the White House,” he said, adding “there’s no bigger megaphone” in American politics.
On the campaign trail in 2023, Trump told a rally in New Hampshire that immigrants were “poisoning the blood of our country” — a remark that drew comparisons to Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler.
Now back in power, Trump’s administration has launched a sweeping and brutal deportation campaign and suspended immigration applications from nationals of 19 of the poorest countries on the planet.
Simultaneously, the president ordered white South African farmers to be admitted to the US, claiming their persecution.

No filter left

“Any filter he might have had is gone,” Terri Givens, a professor at the University of British Columbia in Canada and immigration policy expert, told AFP.
For Trump, it doesn’t matter whether an immigrant obeys the law, or owns a business, or has been here for decades, according to Syracuse University political science professor Mark Brockway.
“They are caught in the middle of Trump’s fight against an invented evil enemy,” Brockway told AFP.
By describing some immigrants as “killers, leeches, and entitlement junkies” — as Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem did earlier this month — the White House is designating a target other than itself for American economic ire at a time when the cost of living has gone up and fears are growing over job security and loss of federal benefits.
But, Bon Tempo noted, “when immigration spikes as an issue, it spikes because of economics sometimes, but it also spikes because of these larger sort of foundational questions about what it means to be an American.”
On November 28, after an Afghan national attacked two National Guard soldiers in Washington, Trump took to his Truth Social network to call for “REVERSE MIGRATION.”
This notion, developed by European far-right theorists such as French writer Renaud Camus, refers to the mass expulsion of foreigners deemed incapable of assimilation.
Digging into the “Make America Great Again” belief system, many experts have noted echoes of the “nativist” current of politics from the 1920s in the US, which held that white, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant culture was the true American identity.
That stance led to immigration policies favoring Northern and Western Europe.
As White House senior adviser Stephen Miller recently wrote on X: “This is the great lie of mass migration. You are not just importing individuals. You are importing societies...At scale, migrants and their descendants recreate the conditions, and terrors, of their broken homelands.”