A court in Tunisia sentenced a man to death for Facebook posts seen as insulting to the president

A police vahicle is parked in front of the Tunis court where Tunisian journalists Borhen Bssaies and Mourad Zeghidi are set to appear in court on May 22, 2024. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 04 October 2025
Follow

A court in Tunisia sentenced a man to death for Facebook posts seen as insulting to the president

  • The ruling is the first of its kind in Tunisia, where dozens have been handed heavy prison sentences over similar charges since Saied seized power over all branches of government in July 2021

TUNIS, Tunisia: A court in Tunisia has sentenced a 51-year-old man to death over Facebook posts deemed offensive to President Kais Saied and a threat to state security, his lawyer said Friday.
Saber Chouchen was convicted on Wednesday of three charges: attempting to overthrow the state, insulting the president and spreading false information online. Judges said the posts incited violence and chaos and violated Tunisia’s penal code as well as the controversial 2022 cybercrime law, Decree 54.
The ruling is the first of its kind in Tunisia, where dozens have been handed heavy prison sentences over similar charges since Saied seized power over all branches of government in July 2021.
Although capital punishment remains in Tunisia’s penal code and civilian courts occasionally issue death sentences, none have been carried out since the execution of a serial killer in 1991.
In a statement on Facebook, lawyer Oussama Bouthelja said his client had been in pretrial detention since January 2024. He said he was a father of three and an occasional day laborer who suffers from a permanent disability caused by a workplace accident.
Bouthelja described him as socially vulnerable and of a limited educational background, with little influence online.
“Most of the content he shared was copied from other pages, and some posts received no engagement at all,” Bouthelja wrote. “In court, he said his intent was to draw authorities’ attention to his difficult living conditions, not to incite unrest.”
The ruling is the latest to use Decree 54, a law that makes it illegal “to produce, spread, disseminate, send or write false news ... with the aim of infringing the rights of others, harming public safety or national defense or sowing terror among the population.” Since its passage in 2022, journalists and human rights groups have condemned the law as a key tool used by authorities to curb freedom of expression in Tunisia.
Tunisia, the birthplace of the 2011 Arab Spring uprisings, was long seen as the last beacon of hope for democracy in the Middle East and North Africa. However, since Saied suspended parliament and consolidated his own power in 2021, political freedoms have shrunk. Saied continues to rule by decree and his most well-known critics are either in prison or abroad.
Rights advocates in Tunisia warned that applying the death penalty for online speech sets a dangerous precedent.

 


Syria opens first public trial over deadly coastal violence

Updated 21 min 21 sec ago
Follow

Syria opens first public trial over deadly coastal violence

  • Seven of the defendants in the court were Assad loyalists
  • The other seven were members of the new government’s security forces

ALEPPO: The first trial was opened on Tuesday of some of the hundreds of suspects linked to deadly clashes in Syria’s coastal provinces earlier this year that quickly spiraled into sectarian attacks.
State media reported that 14 people were brought to Aleppo’s Palace of Justice following a monthslong, government-led investigation into the violence in March involving government forces and supporters of ousted Syrian President Bashar Assad. The investigating committee referred 563 suspects to the judiciary.
Seven of the defendants in the court were Assad loyalists, while the other seven were members of the new government’s security forces. A judge was heard during the televised proceedings asking they were military or civilian.
The trial follows pressure from local civil society and the international community for the country’s new rulers to commit to judicial reform after decades under the autocratic rule of the Assad dynasty.
Despite initial reports from state media that charges could quickly be brought against the defendants, the judge closed the session and rescheduled the next hearing for December.
The charges could include sedition, inciting civil war, attacking security forces, murder, looting and leading armed gangs, state media reported.
Given the scale of the violence and number of suspects, it’s unclear how long the proceedings will take.
The clashes in March erupted after armed groups aligned with Assad ambushed the new government’s security forces. A counteroffensive then spiraled into sectarian revenge attacks and massacres of hundreds of civilians from the Alawite religious minority to which Assad belongs and who largely live along the coast.
The attacks on the Alawite religious minority mounted pressure on interim President Ahmad Al-Sharaa. Since coming to power in December, his government has scrambled to step out from diplomatic isolation and convince the US to drop crippling sanctions and boost trade to rebuild the war-torn country.
The government’s investigating committee in July concluded that over 1,400 people, mostly civilians, were killed during several days of sectarian violence. But the inquiry said there was no evidence that Syria’s new military leaders had ordered attacks on the Alawite community.
A United Nations probe, however, said violence targeting civilians by government-aligned factions were “widespread and systematic.”
The UN commission said during the violence homes in Alawite-majority areas were raided and civilians were asked “whether they were Sunni or Alawite.” It said: ”Alawite men and boys were then taken away to be executed.”