Spooked by AI, Bollywood stars drag Google into fight for ‘personality rights’

FILE PHOTO: Actor Abhishek Bachchan, his wife actress Aishwarya Rai and their daughter Aaradhya pose during a photo opportunity at the wedding ceremony of Akash Ambani, son of the Chairman of Reliance Industries Mukesh Ambani, at Bandra-Kurla Complex in Mumbai, India, March 9, 2019. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 01 October 2025
Follow

Spooked by AI, Bollywood stars drag Google into fight for ‘personality rights’

  • Bollywood couple fight for personality rights in New Delhi court
  • Actors argue AI videos cause harm, should not be used in training
  • Cases could impact how YouTube allows video sharing with consent

NEW DELHI: In India, Bollywood stars are asking judges to protect their voice and persona in the era of artificial intelligence. One famous couple’s biggest target is Google’s video arm YouTube.
Abhishek Bachchan and his wife Aishwarya Rai Bachchan, known for her iconic Cannes Film Festival red carpet appearances, have asked a judge to remove and prohibit creation of AI videos infringing their intellectual property rights. But in a more far-reaching request, they also want Google ordered to have safeguards to ensure such YouTube videos uploaded anyway do not train other AI platforms, legal papers reviewed by Reuters show.
A handful of Bollywood celebrities have begun asserting their “personality rights” in Indian courts over the last few years, as the country has no explicit protection for those like in many US states. But the Bachchans’ lawsuits are the most high-profile to date about the interplay of personality rights and the risk that misleading or deepfake YouTube videos could train other AI models.
The actors argue that YouTube’s content and third-party training policy is concerning as it lets users consent to sharing of a video they created to train rival AI models, risking further proliferation of misleading content online, according to near-identical filings from Abhishek and Aishwarya dated September 6, which are not public.
“Such content being used to train AI models has the potential to multiply the instances of use of any infringing content i.e. first being uploaded on YouTube being viewed by the public, and then also being used to train,” the filings said.
Representatives for the Bachchans and Google spokespersons did not respond to Reuters’ queries. The Delhi High Court last month asked Google’s lawyer in court to submit written responses before the next hearing on January 15.
YouTube’s India managing director, Gunjan Soni, last month described the platform as “the new TV for India.” With around 600 million users, India is YouTube’s biggest market globally, and it is popular for entertainment content like Bollywood videos.

Lawsuit alleges YouTube videos are ‘egregious’
Indian courts have already started to back Bollywood stars upset about generative AI content damaging their reputation. In 2023, a Delhi court restrained the misuse of Anil Kapoor’s image, voice and even a catchphrase he often used.
Reuters is first to report details of the Bachchans’ specific challenge against Google, which was contained in court filings spanning 1,500 pages where they mostly target little-known sellers for unauthorized physical merchandise like posters, coffee mugs and stickers with their photos, and even fake autographed pictures.
They are also seeking $450,000 in damages against Google and others, and a permanent injunction against such exploitation.
The lawsuits contain hundreds of links and screenshots of what they allege are YouTube videos showing “egregious,” “sexually explicit” or “fictitious” AI content.
The judge in early September ordered 518 website links and posts specifically listed by the actors to be taken down, saying they caused financial harm to the couple and harmed their dignity and goodwill.
Reuters, however, found videos similar to the examples of infringing videos cited in Abhishek’s papers on YouTube.
Among them: a clip showing Abhishek posing but then suddenly kissing a film actress using AI manipulation; an AI depiction of Aishwarya and her co-star Salman Khan enjoying a meal together while Abhishek fumes standing behind; and a crocodile chasing Abhishek as Khan tries to save him.
Khan was in a relationship with Aishwarya long before her marriage. His spokesperson did not respond to Reuters’ queries.

AI can generate Bollywood love stories
YouTube’s data-sharing policy states creators can opt in to share their videos for training models of other AI platforms, like OpenAI, Meta and xAI. YouTube adds: “We can’t control what a third-party company does” if users share videos for such training.
The Bachchans argue in their filings that if AI platforms are trained on biased content that portrays them in a negative manner and infringes their intellectual property rights, then AI models “are likely to learn all such untrue” information, leading to its further spread.
Eashan Ghosh, chair professor for intellectual property rights at the National Law University Delhi, said it would be difficult for actors to build a direct case against YouTube since their grievances are mostly with creators and personality rights infringement.
But “it wouldn’t be beyond the pale for the court to nudge YouTube to write something into their user policies or set up a queue jump for celebrity claimants to get quicker responses to legal requests,” he said.
YouTube in May disclosed that it had paid more than $2.4 billion to Indian creators in the last three years. The actors alleged that creators infringing their personality rights can make money when videos become popular.
Reuters found a channel on YouTube titled “AI Bollywood Ishq” that shares “AI-generated Bollywood love stories.” Its 259 videos have garnered 16.5 million views. The most popular video with 4.1 million views shows an AI animation of Khan and Aishwarya in a pool, while another shows them on a swing.
In a tutorial, the channel explains it used simple text prompts to create an image via X’s Grok AI and then turned it into a video using Chinese AI startup MiniMax’s Hailuo AI. A Reuters test generated an AI video showing lookalikes of Bollywood stars Khan and Abhishek in a fistfight within five minutes.
Grok, MiniMax and the owner of YouTube channel @AIbollywoodishq did not respond to Reuters’ queries. It was unclear whether the YouTube channel consented to sharing those videos for AI training.
“Content is made only for entertainment and creative storytelling,” the channel’s page said.


Israeli court overturns conviction of officer who assaulted Palestinian journalist, citing ‘Oct. 7 PTSD’

Updated 25 February 2026
Follow

Israeli court overturns conviction of officer who assaulted Palestinian journalist, citing ‘Oct. 7 PTSD’

  • Judge sentenced Yitzhak Sofer to 300 hours of community service, saying officer “devoted his life to Israel’s security” and conviction was “disproportionate to severity of his actions”
  • Footage shows Sofer throwing photojournalist Mustafa Alkharouf to the ground, and repeatedly beating and kicking him while he covered Palestinian gatherings near Al-Aqsa Mosque

LONDON: An Israeli court overturned the conviction of a border police officer who assaulted a Palestinian journalist, ruling his actions were influenced by post-traumatic stress disorder from serving during the Oct. 7 2023 attacks.

On Tuesday, the Jerusalem Magistrate’s Court sentenced officer Yitzhak Sofer to 300 hours of community service for assaulting Anadolu Agency photojournalist Mustafa Alkharouf in occupied East Jerusalem in December 2023.

Footage shows Sofer and other officers drawing weapons, throwing Alkharouf to the ground, and repeatedly beating and kicking him while he covered Palestinian gatherings near Al-Aqsa Mosque amid heavy restrictions.

Alkharouf was hospitalized with facial and body injuries. His cameraman, Faiz Abu Ramila, was also attacked.

Sofer had been convicted in September 2024 of assault causing bodily harm (acquitted of threats) and initially faced six months’ community service, as recommended by Mahash, the Justice Ministry’s police misconduct unit.

Judge Amir Shaked accepted the defense request to cancel the conviction, replacing it with community service.

He cited Sofer’s PTSD from responding to the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack, noting the officer had “no prior criminal record” and had “devoted his life to Israel’s security.”

“The court cannot ignore this when considering whether the defendant’s conviction should stand,” he said, adding that while the incident is “serious and does cross the criminal threshold,” the conviction in place could cause Sofer harm “disproportionate to the severity of his actions.”

The ruling comes amid surging attacks on journalists in the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza since Israel’s war on Gaza began.

The Committee to Protect Journalists reported Israel responsible for two-thirds of the 129 media workers killed worldwide in 2025, the deadliest year on record, citing a “persistent culture of impunity” and lack of transparent probes.

Reporters Without Borders called the Israeli army the “worst enemy of journalists” in its 2025 report, with nearly half of global reporter deaths in Gaza.

Foreign journalists face raids, arrests and intimidation. In late January 2026, Israel’s Supreme Court granted a delay on ruling a ban on foreign media access to Gaza.