After Charlie Kirk’s death, Trump team calls for dismantling leftist groups

US Vice President JD Vance hosts an episode of the Charlie Kirk Show in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House campus in Washington, DC, on September 15, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 16 September 2025
Follow

After Charlie Kirk’s death, Trump team calls for dismantling leftist groups

  • Right-wing groups have pushed the administration to do more than prosecute the shooter

WASHINGTON: Vice President JD Vance and another top official in President Donald Trump’s administration on Monday argued that serving the memory of Charlie Kirk means pursuing left-leaning groups they portray as bent on undermining national unity. Vance, who guest-hosted the slain conservative activist’s livestream show, amplified right-wing calls for a broadside against leftist groups after Kirk was assassinated last week as he addressed college students.
White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, Vance’s guest on the program, said Kirk’s final message to him called for a coordinated effort against unnamed left-wing groups accused of promoting violence, pledging the federal government would use “every available resource” to dismantle them.
“With God as my witness, we are going to use every resource we have at the Department of Justice, Homeland Security and throughout this government to identify, disrupt, dismantle and destroy these networks and make America safe again for the American people,” he said. “It will happen, and we will do it in Charlie’s name.”
Later, Miller told reporters at the White House that the Trump administration is looking at holding criminally accountable a network of “nonprofit entities” that organize attacks on law enforcement, use doxxing and supply materials used in riots. He did not provide evidence of such wrongdoing.
The remarks by top Trump administration officials on Monday offered the clearest indication yet of what steps the White House is weighing in response to Kirk’s death. Critics have for days expressed worry that Trump would use Kirk’s assassination as a pretext to crack down on political opponents. Investigators have yet to piece together why the alleged gunman, Tyler Robinson, allegedly shot Kirk on Wednesday. Investigators found messages engraved into four bullet casings, which included references to memes and video game in-jokes, though experts warned that the messages offered no clear indications about a political motivation.
Right-wing groups have pushed the administration to do more than prosecute the shooter.
Vance, who hosted “The Charlie Kirk Show” podcast for more than two hours, went further than other administration officials by naming two institutions: the Open Society Foundations, funded by billionaire and Democratic donor George Soros; and the Ford Foundation, accusing the philanthropic organizations of funding an article in The Nation magazine that he criticized. Both groups said they do not currently fund The Nation.

DISAGREEMENT OVER KIRK’S LEGACY
“I read a story in The Nation magazine about my dear friend Charlie Kirk,” Vance said during the podcast. “George Soros’ Open Society Foundation funds this magazine, as does the Ford Foundation and many other wealthy titans of the American progressive movement.”
Elizabeth Spiers, who wrote the article headlined “Charlie Kirk’s Legacy Deserves No Mourning,” noted she “explicitly stated that no one should ever be killed for their views” in her article and suggested Vance either misunderstood her piece or was deliberately misrepresenting her words to sow division and personally target her.
In her article, Spiers described Kirk as “an unrepentant racist, transphobe, homophobe, and misogynist who often wrapped his bigotry in Bible verses because there was no other way to pretend that it was morally correct.” A number of civil rights advocates have over the years criticized Kirk’s views on Black people, women, the LGBT community, Muslims and immigrants, citing his public comments that they called derogatory and racist. Kirk’s supporters cast him as an influential, charismatic and devout Christian figure committed to civil debate of controversial issues, and credit him with galvanizing younger voters for Trump.
A spokesperson for the Open Society Foundations called Vance’s accusations “disgraceful” and said the group’s work is “entirely peaceful and lawful.” A spokesperson for the Ford Foundation said The Nation has received only a single grant, in 2019, and currently provides no funding to the outlet.
The Nation said it stood by Spiers’ critique of Kirk. “In our 160 years of publication, we’ve long believed that dissent is the highest form of patriotism and we are proud of our journalistic legacy in pursuit of a more equal and just world,” the publication added in a statement.
A wave of violence across the political spectrum has afflicted the United States in recent years, targeting both Democrats and Republicans.
Trump, who has a history of using severe rhetoric against political opponents, blamed the “radical left” almost immediately after Kirk was shot and before a suspect was identified.
On Friday, police arrested 22-year-old Robinson, of Utah, and charged him with Kirk’s murder. State records show Robinson was a registered voter but had no political party affiliation.

 


Louvre Museum closed as workers launch rolling strike

Museum staff protest outside the entrance to the Louvre in Paris on Monday. (AFP)
Updated 7 sec ago
Follow

Louvre Museum closed as workers launch rolling strike

  • After the memo, French President Emmanuel Macron announced a massive renovation plan for the museum, expected to cost €700 million to €800 million (up to $940 million)

PARIS: The Louvre closed its doors to thousands of disappointed visitors on Monday as staff launched a rolling strike to protest working conditions at the Paris landmark, two months after a shocking robbery.

Staff assembled outside the museum’s world-famous glass pyramid, blocking the main entrance and holding signs, as security agents turned tourists away.

“The Louvre on strike,” said a banner.

“All together all together,” striking staff shouted. “Who does the Louvre belong to? To us!“

Workers are demanding extra staff and measures to tackle overcrowding, adding to the woes of the world’s most visited museum just as France gears up for the Christmas holidays.

“We are angry,” Elize Muller, a security guard, told reporters. “We disagree with the way the Louvre has been managed.”

The strike comes nearly two months after the museum was victim of an embarrassing daylight heist that saw crown jewels worth $102 million stolen.

A notice in the museum’s courtyard said the Louvre would remain closed on Monday.

At a general meeting, around 400 employees voted unanimously to launch a strike, which can be renewed, to protest the “deterioration” of working conditions, the CGT and CFDT unions said.

Another general meeting was scheduled to take place Wednesday. The museum is closed on Tuesdays.

“I’m very disappointed, because the Louvre was the main reason for our visit in Paris, because we wanted to see the ‘Mona Lisa’,” said 37-year-old Minsoo Kim, who had traveled from Seoul with his wife for their honeymoon.

Natalia Brown, a 28-year-old tourist from London, said she understands “why they’re doing it,” but called it “unfortunate timing for us.”

Rachel Adams, a 60-year-old real estate agent from Utah, said she had heard of the plans to strike.

“I think that the Louvre makes a lot of money and they should be handling their finances quite a bit better. They had the big water leak. I mean, this is important stuff.”

Speaking on the eve of the action, Christian Galani, from the hard-left CGT union, said the strike would have broad support across the museum’s 2,200-strong workforce.

“We’re going to have a lot more strikers than usual,” Galani said.

“Normally, it’s front-of-house and security staff. This time, there are scientists, documentarians, collections managers, even curators and colleagues in the workshops telling us they plan to go on strike.”

All have different grievances, adding up to a picture of staff discontent inside the institution, just as it finds itself in a harsh public spotlight following the shocking robbery on Oct. 19.

Reception and security staff complain they are understaffed and required to manage vast flows of people, with the home of Leonardo da Vinci’s “Mona Lisa” welcoming several million people beyond its planned capacity each year.

A spontaneous walk-out protest in June led the museum to temporarily close.

The Louvre has become a symbol of so-called “over-tourism,” with the 30,000 daily visitors facing what unions call an “obstacle course” of hazards, long queues, and sub-standard toilets and catering.

Documentarians and curators are increasingly horrified by the state of disrepair inside the former royal palace, with a recent water leak and the closure of a gallery due to structural problems underlining the difficulties.

“The building is not in a good state,” chief Louvre architect Francois Chatillon admitted in front of lawmakers last month.

Under-fire Louvre boss Laurence des Cars, who faces persistent calls to resign, warned the government in January in a widely publicized memo about leaks, overheating and the declining visitor experience.

After the memo, French President Emmanuel Macron announced a massive renovation plan for the museum, expected to cost €700 million to €800 million (up to $940 million).

Questions continue to swirl since the break-in over whether it was avoidable and why the national treasure appeared to be poorly protected.

Two intruders used a portable extendable ladder to access the gallery containing the crown jewels, cutting through a glass door with angle grinders in front of startled visitors before stealing eight priceless items.

Investigations have since revealed that only one security camera was working outside when they struck, that guards in the control room did not have enough screens to watch the coverage in real time, and that police were initially misdirected.