REVIEW: ‘Hostage’ — strong female duo lead this gripping political thriller

Suranne Jones (L) as Abigail, Julie Delpy as Vivienne in 'Hostage.' (Supplied)
Short Url
Updated 05 September 2025
Follow

REVIEW: ‘Hostage’ — strong female duo lead this gripping political thriller

RIYADH: There’s much to enjoy about “Hostage.” Not least that its makers have been wise enough to keep it to a taught, tense five episodes.

Suranne Jones plays Abigail Dalton, the UK prime minister who finds herself in the middle of a nationwide cancer-drug shortage crippling the National Health Service she promised to fix on the campaign trail. To attempt to do this she has had to “gut” military spending.

To get the urgently needed drugs, she needs the help of president Vivienne Toussaint (a regally icy Julie Delpy), who — following the guidance of her slimy media mogul husband — has apparently abandoned her once tightly held principles and embraced populism in order to gain power. It’s a make-or-break summit for Dalton.

However, before she can even open negotiations, she receives a video informing her that her husband Alex — a doctor with Médecins Sans Frontières (i.e. a Good Man) — has been kidnapped while working in French Guiana. His abductors are demanding that Dalton resign. What to do? Well, if only she hadn’t gutted the UK military, perhaps she could launch a rescue mission, but now she’ll need Toussaint’s help. Just when it seems like she’s going to get it, Toussaint receives a video on her phone — an extremely private, extremely compromising video. Abort the rescue mission, she’s told, or the video goes public.

It's a smart setup for a show that never lets up. There are several twists and turns, red herrings, and plots within plots.

It’s helped by the conviction with which its two leads play powerful women in tough situations with their idealism compromised. Jones is excellent as Dalton, caught painfully between her patriotic and familial duties, and “Hostage” should introduce a new generation (who may not have seen her opposite Ethan Hawke in Richard Linklater’s “Before” trilogy) to Delpy’s indisputable talent. Creator Matt Charman manages to blend edge-of-the-seat action with a few shots at right-wing anti-immigration rhetoric, politicians’ sometimes tenuous link with reality, and more.  

There are holes here, if you’re really feeling nitpicky. For example, the writers gloss over the remarkable lack of security for Dalton’s husband in the jungle with a quick “There’s never been any trouble there before.” Sure. And has a PM’s spouse ever been working over there before?

Suspend your disbelief a little, though, and “Hostage” really is a lot of fun.


Review: Netflix’s ‘The New Yorker at 100’

Updated 14 December 2025
Follow

Review: Netflix’s ‘The New Yorker at 100’

  • Directed by Marshall Curry, the documentary opened the doors to the publication’s meticulous world, offering viewers a rare look inside the issues within the magazine’s issues

Out this month, Netflix’s “The New Yorker at 100” documentary marks the centennial of the weekly that has brought forth arguably some of the most compelling long-form journalism in my lifetime.

As a ferocious reader with an insatiable appetite for print, I vividly recall picking-up a copy of The New Yorker in Saudi Arabia after school as a teen, determined to read it cover-to-cover — only to find myself mentally, intellectually and physically exhausted after deciphering a single lyrical and Herculean-sized long-form piece.

Reading The New Yorker still makes one both feel smarter — and perhaps not smart enough — at the very same time. Just like the documentary.

Much like Vogue’s 2009 documentary, “The September Issue,” which followed (now retired) editor-in-chief Anna Wintour as she prepared for the September 2007 issue; this documentary largely centered on the making of the Feb. 17 & 24, 2025 multi-cover edition.

A quintessentially New York staple that readers either love or loathe — or both — the magazine has long been seen as a highbrow publication for the “elite.”

But The New Yorker is in on the joke. It never did take itself too seriously.

Directed by Marshall Curry, the documentary opened the doors to the publication’s meticulous world, offering viewers a rare look inside the issues within the magazine’s issues.

Narrated by actress Julianne Moore, it included sit-down interviews with famous figures, largely offering gushing testimonials.

It, of course, included many cameos from pop culture references such as from “Seinfeld,” “The Good Place” and others.

It also mentioned New Yorker’s famed late writers Anthony Bourdain and Truman Capote, and Ronan Farrow.

As a journalist myself, I enjoyed the behind-the-scenes peeks into staff meetings and editing discussions, including the line-by-line fact-checking process.

While lovingly headquartered in New York — and now based at One World Trade Center after decades in the heart of Times Square — the magazine has long published dispatches from elsewhere in the country and around the world.

I wish there had been more airtime dedicated to Jeanette “Jane” Cole Grant, who co-founded the magazine with her husband-at-the-time, Harold Ross, during the Roaring Twenties.

Ironically, neither founder hailed from New York — Grant arrived from Missouri at 16 to pursue singing before becoming a journalist on staff at The New York Times — and Ross came from a Colorado mining town.

Perhaps more bizarrely, Ross, who served as the first editor-in-chief of The New Yorker — known today for its intricate reporting and 11 Pulitzer Prizes — had dropped out of school at 13. He served as lead editor for 26 years until his death, guided by instinct and surrounded by talented writers he hired.

As the Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and the magazine’s fifth editor-in-chief, David Remnick has held the role since 1998. “It is a place that publishes a 15,000-word profile of a musician one week, a 9,000-word account from Southern Lebanon, with gag cartoons interspersed in them,” he said in one scene.

It also offered a glimpse of the leadership of his predecessor, the vivacious and provocative Tina Brown, who served as editor-in-chief for six years starting in 1992.

No woman has held the top editor position before or since her tenure.

Some of the most compelling moments in the documentary, for me, showed journalists scribbling in reporter notebooks in darkened movie theaters, rocking-out in dingy punk shows, and reporting from political rallies while life unfolded around them.

These journalists were not sitting in diners, merely chasing the money or seated in corner offices; they were on the ground, focused on accuracy and texture, intent on portraying what it meant to be a New Yorker who cared about the world, both beyond the city’s borders and within them.

While Arab bylines remain limited, the insights from current marginalized writers and editors showed how the magazine has been trying to diversify and include more contributors of color. They are still working on it.

A century in, this documentary feels like an issue of The New Yorker — except perhaps easier to complete.