7 arrested after pro-Palestinian activists occupy Microsoft president’s office

1 / 2
Protestors hung a banner by the Microsoft President's office window that said “Mai Ubeid Building,” in honor of a Palestinian software engineer killed in an Israeli airstrike in Gaza. (Supplied)
2 / 2
As the sit-in was happening, over 30 Microsoft workers, former workers, and community members gathered for an hour-long rally outside Building 34 before they were dispersed by the police. (Supplied)
Short Url
Updated 28 August 2025
Follow

7 arrested after pro-Palestinian activists occupy Microsoft president’s office

  • Simultaneously, police dispersed a one-hour rally held outside the building by around 30 demonstrators
  • Microsoft President Brad Smith said the company welcomes discussions, not vandalism and violence

WASHINGTON: Redmond police arrested seven protesters on Tuesday after a sit-in at the office of Microsoft President Brad Smith in Washington.

The demonstration was part of an escalating campaign by the group “No Azure for Apartheid” — which includes current and former Microsoft employees — over what it describes as the company’s complicity in alleged Israeli war crimes through its Azure cloud services.

During the sit-in, which included demands that the tech giant sever ties with the Israeli military, demonstrators entered Building 34 and occupied Smith’s office.

They hung a notice that read “The People’s Court Summons Bradford Lee Smith on Charges of Crimes Against Humanity” and chanted slogans such as “Brad Smith, you can’t hide, you’re supporting genocide!” and “Free Palestine.” They also hung a banner by the office window that said “Mai Ubeid Building,” in honor of a Palestinian software engineer killed in an Israeli airstrike in Gaza.

On Tuesday, Microsoft’s Smith confirmed two of the protesters were current employees who would face disciplinary action. No further details were disclosed as internal investigations are ongoing.

Abdo Mohamed, a “No Azure for Apartheid” organizer and former tech worker fired by Microsoft, told Arab News three of the detainees were former company employees.

A statement from Redmond police said seven individuals were arrested on charges of trespassing, resisting arrest and obstruction after they refused to leave the premises. Investigations are ongoing.

 

 

Simultaneously, police dispersed a one-hour rally held outside the building by around 30 demonstrators, including Microsoft employees and local community members.

Smith said the company was committed to listening to employees’ concerns and upholding the right to freedom of expression “that everyone in this country enjoys, as long as they do it lawfully.”

He said protesters “stormed the building, occupied an office, locked people out of the office, planted listening devices even in crude form and the form of cell phones, hidden under couches and behind books” and refused to leave when asked.

“That’s not okay,” he added, reaffirming Microsoft’s commitment to maintaining workplace safety and security while keeping communication channels with employees open. He said the company would be updating its security protocols to prevent similar breaches in the future.

The sit-ins come less than a week after 18 protesters were arrested for pouring red paint over a Microsoft sign and blocking a pedestrian bridge at the company’s East Campus in Redmond. The protests followed an investigation by The Guardian, in collaboration with +972 Magazine and Local Call, which revealed the Israeli military was using Microsoft’s Azure cloud services to store recordings of up to “a million calls an hour” made by Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza.

Microsoft launched an internal investigation into the allegations and pledged to make the findings public. The company said it primarily worked with the Israeli government to defend its cyberspace against external threats but acknowledged it had no visibility into how its services are used once deployed on customer-owned servers and devices.

“There are many things that we cannot do to change the world, but we will do what we can and what we should,” Smith told reporters. “That starts with ensuring that our human rights principles and contractual terms of service are upheld everywhere by all of our customers around the world.”

According to a Bloomberg report published on Tuesday, the growing protests prompted Microsoft to ask the FBI for help in tracking and stopping pro-Palestinian protests from disrupting major events. The move followed a high-profile incident during Microsoft’s 50th anniversary celebrations in April, when two employees interrupted a panel discussion featuring CEO Satya Nadella, former CEO Steve Ballmer and co-founder Bill Gates. It was reported their employment was later terminated.

Smith said the company did not retaliate against employees who raised concerns or submitted petitions through official internal channels.

“People can go protest in public spaces, whether it’s at the Redmond Transit Center or in a kayak on a public lake outside my house,” Smith said, referring to Sunday’s demonstrations in Lake Washington near his residence and that of Nadella.

“We don’t retaliate for that, but if people engage in vandalism, violate repeatedly our email policies, storm buildings and occupy offices; if they create threats to others, that’s different.”


BBC says will fight Trump's $10 bn defamation lawsuit

Updated 16 December 2025
Follow

BBC says will fight Trump's $10 bn defamation lawsuit

LONDON: The BBC said Tuesday it would fight a $10-billion lawsuit brought by US President Donald Trump against the British broadcaster over a documentary that edited his 2021 speech ahead of the US Capitol riot.
“As we have made clear previously, we will be defending this case,” a BBC spokesperson said in a statement sent to AFP, adding the company would not be making “further comment on ongoing legal proceedings.”
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Miami, seeks “damages in an amount not less than $5,000,000,000” for each of two counts against the British broadcaster, for alleged defamation and violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.
The video that triggered the lawsuit spliced together two separate sections of Trump’s speech on January 6, 2021 in a way that made it appear he explicitly urged supporters to attack the Capitol, where lawmakers were certifying Joe Biden’s 2020 election win.
The lawsuit comes as the UK government on Tuesday launched the politically sensitive review of the BBC’s Royal Charter, which outlines the corporation’s funding and governance and needs to be renewed in 2027.
As part of the review, it launched a public consultation on issues including the role of “accuracy” in the BBC’s mission and contentious reforms to the corporation’s funding model, which currently relies on a mandatory fee for anyone in the country who watches television.
Minister Stephen Kinnock stressed after the lawsuit was filed that the UK government “is a massive supporter of the BBC.”
The BBC has “been very clear that there is no case to answer in terms of Mr.Trump’s accusation on the broader point of libel or defamation. I think it’s right the BBC stands firm on that point,” Kinnock told Sky News on Tuesday.
Trump, 79, had said the lawsuit was imminent, claiming the BBC had “put words in my mouth,” even positing that “they used AI or something.”
The documentary at issue aired last year before the 2024 election, on the BBC’s “Panorama” flagship current affairs program.

Apology letter 

“The formerly respected and now disgraced BBC defamed President Trump by intentionally, maliciously, and deceptively doctoring his speech in a brazen attempt to interfere in the 2024 Presidential Election,” a spokesperson for Trump’s legal team said in a statement to AFP.
“The BBC has a long pattern of deceiving its audience in coverage of President Trump, all in service of its own leftist political agenda,” the statement added.
The British Broadcasting Corporation, whose audience extends well beyond the United Kingdom, faced a period of turmoil last month after a media report brought renewed attention to the edited clip.
The scandal led the BBC director general, Tim Davie, and the organization’s top news executive, Deborah Turness, to resign.
Trump’s lawsuit says the edited speech in the documentary was “fabricated and aired by the Defendants one week before the 2024 Presidential Election in a brazen attempt to interfere in and influence the Election’s outcome to President Trump’s detriment.”
The BBC has denied Trump’s claims of legal defamation, though BBC chairman Samir Shah has sent Trump a letter of apology.
Shah also told a UK parliamentary committee last month the broadcaster should have acted sooner to acknowledge its mistake after the error was disclosed in a memo, which was leaked to The Daily Telegraph newspaper.
The BBC lawsuit is the latest in a string of legal actions Trump has taken against media companies in recent years, several of which have led to multi-million-dollar settlements.