Bangladesh runs out of resources for Rohingya as global support plunges

1 / 2
Muhammad Yunus, head of Bangladesh's interim government, addresses an international conference on the Rohingya crisis in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh on Aug. 25, 2025. (AFP)
2 / 2
Rohingya Muslim refugees who were stranded after leaving Myanmar walk toward the Balukhali refugee camp after crossing the border in Bangladesh’s Ukhia district on November 2, 2017. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 25 August 2025
Follow

Bangladesh runs out of resources for Rohingya as global support plunges

  • UN’s response plan for Rohingya crisis is only 36% funded for 2025-26
  • Bangladesh looks for alternative strategies to stop violence in Myanmar, expert says

DHAKA: Bangladesh is unable to allocate additional resources for the growing number of Rohingya refugees, the country’s leader said on Monday, as he called on the international community to deliver on UN commitments to address the crisis.

The chief of Bangladesh’s interim government, Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, was addressing a two-day conference in Cox’s Bazar, held by the Bangladeshi government ahead of a high-level meeting at the UN General Assembly in September.

It comes eight years after hundreds of thousands of Rohingya were forced to flee a military crackdown in Myanmar and take shelter in neighboring Bangladesh.

Today, more than 1.3 million Rohingya are cramped inside 33 camps in the Cox’s Bazar district on the country’s southeast coast, making it the world’s largest refugee settlement.

While the number of refugees arriving from Myanmar has increased by some 150,000 since last year, international aid is dwindling. The latest Joint Response Plan for the Rohingya Humanitarian Crisis in Bangladesh has only 36 percent funding from the requested 2025-26 amount of nearly $935 million.

Bangladesh, which is already grappling with domestic challenges, does not “foresee any scope whatsoever for further mobilization of resources from domestic sources” to sustain the refugees, Yunus said.

“During the last eight years, people of Bangladesh, in particular the host community here in Cox’s Bazaar, have been making tremendous sacrifices. The impacts on our economy, resources, environment and ecosystem, society and governance have been huge,” he told attendees.

“(The) Rohingya issue and its sustainable resolution must be kept alive on the global agenda, as they need our support until they return home.”

Despite multiple attempts from Bangladeshi authorities, a UN-backed repatriation and resettlement process has failed to take off for the past few years.

Efforts have been stalled by armed conflict in Myanmar since the military junta seized power in 2021, and the number of refuges has been steadily increasing. In 2024, it grew sharply as fighting escalated in Rakhine state between junta troops and the Arakan Army, a powerful local ethnic militia.

Yunus called on the international community to draft a practical roadmap to end the violence, enable the Rohingya’s return to Rakhine, and hold perpetrators of violence and ethnic cleansing accountable.

“We urge upon all to calibrate their relationship with Myanmar and Arakan Army, and all parties to the conflict, in order to promote an early resolution of the protracted crisis,” he said.

“We urge all of the international community to add dynamism to the ongoing international accountability processes at the International Court of Justice, International Criminal Court and elsewhere.”

As the UN conference on Rohingya nears, with another scheduled to take place in Doha in December, the meeting in Cox’s Bazaar — where donors will also visit the Rohingya camps — is seen as an attempt to find a new strategy to address the crisis. Regional efforts are also being encouraged, with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations earlier this month vowing to send a peace mission to Myanmar — its member state.

“We’ve seen during the last few months, especially during the interim government, that they have been trying to see if there could be some alternative ways of advocacy or getting Myanmar to accept certain positions through the ASEAN,” Asif Munier, a rights and migration expert, told Arab News.

“We know that it would be very difficult to get a common understanding at the UN Security Council to vote against Myanmar authorities. But if there could be other efforts to provide some sort of justice — that’s something that also should come up.”


Starmer’s chief of staff quits over former US ambassador's Epstein ties

Updated 11 sec ago
Follow

Starmer’s chief of staff quits over former US ambassador's Epstein ties

  • Morgan McSweeney said he took responsibility for advising UK's PM to appoint Peter Mandelson as Washington envoy
  • Epstein files suggest that Mandelson sent market-sensitive information to the convicted sex offender when he was part of UK government
LONDON: British Prime Minister Keir Starmer's chief of staff resigned Sunday over the furor surrounding the appointment of Peter Mandelson as the UK ambassador to the US despite his ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
Morgan McSweeney said he took responsibility for advising Starmer to appoint Mandelson, 72, to Britain’s most important diplomatic post in 2024.
“The decision to appoint Peter Mandelson was wrong. He has damaged our party, our country and trust in politics itself,” McSweeney said in a statement. “When asked, I advised the Prime Minister to make that appointment and I take full responsibility for that advice.”
Starmer is facing a political storm and questions about his judgment after newly published documents, part of a huge trove of Epstein files made public in the United States, suggested that Mandelson sent market-sensitive information to the convicted sex offender when he was the UK government’s business secretary during the 2008 financial crisis.
Starmer’s government has promised to release its own emails and other documentation related to Mandelson’s appointment, which it says will show that Mandelson misled officials.
The prime minister apologized this week for “having believed Mandelson’s lies.”
He acknowledged that when Mandelson was chosen for the top diplomat job in 2024, the vetting process had revealed that Mandelson’s friendship with Epstein continued after the latter’s 2008 conviction. But Starmer maintained that “none of us knew the depth of the darkness” of that relationship at the time.
A number of lawmakers said Starmer is ultimately responsible for the scandal.
“Keir Starmer has to take responsibility for his own terrible decisions,” said Kemi Badenoch, leader of the opposition Conservative Party.
Mandelson, a former Cabinet minister, ambassador and elder statesman of the governing Labour Party, has not been arrested or charged.
Metropolitan Police officers searched Mandelson’s London home and another property linked to him on Friday. Police said the investigation is complex and will require “a significant amount of further evidence gathering and analysis.”
The UK police investigation centers on potential misconduct in public office, and Mandelson is not accused of any sexual offenses.
Starmer had fired Mandelson in September from his ambassadorial job over earlier revelations about his Epstein ties. But critics say the emails recently published by the US Justice Department have brought serious concerns about Starmer’s judgment to the fore. They argue that he should have known better than to appoint Mandelson in the first place.
The new revelations include documents suggesting Mandelson shared sensitive government information with Epstein after the 2008 global financial crisis. They also include records of payments totaling $75,000 in 2003 and 2004 from Epstein to accounts linked to Mandelson or his husband Reinaldo Avila da Silva.
Aside from his association with Epstein, Mandelson previously had to resign twice from senior government posts because of scandals over money or ethics.
Starmer had faced growing pressure over the past week to fire McSweeney, who is regarded as a key adviser in Downing Street and seen as a close ally of Mandelson.
Starmer on Sunday credited McSweeney as a central figure in running Labour’s recent election campaign and the party’s 2004 landslide victory. His statement did not mention the Mandelson scandal.