Bangladesh runs out of resources for Rohingya as global support plunges

1 / 2
Muhammad Yunus, head of Bangladesh's interim government, addresses an international conference on the Rohingya crisis in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh on Aug. 25, 2025. (AFP)
2 / 2
Rohingya Muslim refugees who were stranded after leaving Myanmar walk toward the Balukhali refugee camp after crossing the border in Bangladesh’s Ukhia district on November 2, 2017. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 25 August 2025
Follow

Bangladesh runs out of resources for Rohingya as global support plunges

  • UN’s response plan for Rohingya crisis is only 36% funded for 2025-26
  • Bangladesh looks for alternative strategies to stop violence in Myanmar, expert says

DHAKA: Bangladesh is unable to allocate additional resources for the growing number of Rohingya refugees, the country’s leader said on Monday, as he called on the international community to deliver on UN commitments to address the crisis.

The chief of Bangladesh’s interim government, Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, was addressing a two-day conference in Cox’s Bazar, held by the Bangladeshi government ahead of a high-level meeting at the UN General Assembly in September.

It comes eight years after hundreds of thousands of Rohingya were forced to flee a military crackdown in Myanmar and take shelter in neighboring Bangladesh.

Today, more than 1.3 million Rohingya are cramped inside 33 camps in the Cox’s Bazar district on the country’s southeast coast, making it the world’s largest refugee settlement.

While the number of refugees arriving from Myanmar has increased by some 150,000 since last year, international aid is dwindling. The latest Joint Response Plan for the Rohingya Humanitarian Crisis in Bangladesh has only 36 percent funding from the requested 2025-26 amount of nearly $935 million.

Bangladesh, which is already grappling with domestic challenges, does not “foresee any scope whatsoever for further mobilization of resources from domestic sources” to sustain the refugees, Yunus said.

“During the last eight years, people of Bangladesh, in particular the host community here in Cox’s Bazaar, have been making tremendous sacrifices. The impacts on our economy, resources, environment and ecosystem, society and governance have been huge,” he told attendees.

“(The) Rohingya issue and its sustainable resolution must be kept alive on the global agenda, as they need our support until they return home.”

Despite multiple attempts from Bangladeshi authorities, a UN-backed repatriation and resettlement process has failed to take off for the past few years.

Efforts have been stalled by armed conflict in Myanmar since the military junta seized power in 2021, and the number of refuges has been steadily increasing. In 2024, it grew sharply as fighting escalated in Rakhine state between junta troops and the Arakan Army, a powerful local ethnic militia.

Yunus called on the international community to draft a practical roadmap to end the violence, enable the Rohingya’s return to Rakhine, and hold perpetrators of violence and ethnic cleansing accountable.

“We urge upon all to calibrate their relationship with Myanmar and Arakan Army, and all parties to the conflict, in order to promote an early resolution of the protracted crisis,” he said.

“We urge all of the international community to add dynamism to the ongoing international accountability processes at the International Court of Justice, International Criminal Court and elsewhere.”

As the UN conference on Rohingya nears, with another scheduled to take place in Doha in December, the meeting in Cox’s Bazaar — where donors will also visit the Rohingya camps — is seen as an attempt to find a new strategy to address the crisis. Regional efforts are also being encouraged, with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations earlier this month vowing to send a peace mission to Myanmar — its member state.

“We’ve seen during the last few months, especially during the interim government, that they have been trying to see if there could be some alternative ways of advocacy or getting Myanmar to accept certain positions through the ASEAN,” Asif Munier, a rights and migration expert, told Arab News.

“We know that it would be very difficult to get a common understanding at the UN Security Council to vote against Myanmar authorities. But if there could be other efforts to provide some sort of justice — that’s something that also should come up.”


House Republicans barely defeat Venezuela war powers resolution to check Trump’s military actions

Updated 23 January 2026
Follow

House Republicans barely defeat Venezuela war powers resolution to check Trump’s military actions

WASHINGTON: The House rejected a Democratic-backed resolution Thursday that would have prevented President Donald Trump from sending US military forces to Venezuela after a tied vote on the legislation fell just short of the majority needed for passage.
The tied vote was the latest sign of Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson’s tenuous hold on the majority, as well as some of the growing pushback in the GOP-controlled Congress to Trump’s aggressions in the Western Hemisphere. A Senate vote on a similar resolution was also tied last week until Vice President JD Vance broke the deadlock.
To defeat the resolution Thursday, Republican leaders had to hold the vote open for more than 20 minutes while Republican Rep. Wesley Hunt, who had been out of Washington all week campaigning for a Senate seat in Texas, rushed back to Capitol Hill to cast the decisive vote.
On the House floor, Democrats responded with shouts that Republican leaders were violating the chamber’s procedural rules. Two Republicans — Reps. Don Bacon of Nebraska and Thomas Massie of Kentucky — voted with all Democrats for the legislation.
The war powers resolution would have directed Trump to remove US troops from Venezuela. The Trump administration told senators last week that there are no US troops on the ground in the South American nation and committed to getting congressional approval before launching major military operations there.
But Democrats argued that the resolution is necessary after the US raid to capture Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro and since Trump has stated plans to control the country’s oil industry for years to come.
The response to Trump’s foreign policy
Thursday’s vote was the latest test in Congress of how much leeway Republicans will give a president who campaigned on removing the US from foreign entanglements but has increasingly reached for military options to impose his will in the Western Hemisphere. So far, almost all Republicans have declined to put checks on Trump through the war powers votes.
Rep. Brian Mast, the Republican chair of the House Armed Services Committee, accused Democrats of bringing the war powers resolution to a vote out of “spite” for Trump.
“It’s about the fact that you don’t want President Trump to arrest Maduro, and you will condemn him no matter what he does, even though he brought Maduro to justice with possibly the most successful law enforcement operation in history,” Mast added.
Still, Democrats stridently argued that Congress needs to assert its role in determining when the president can use wartime powers. They have been able to force a series of votes in both the House and Senate as Trump, in recent months, ramped up his campaign against Maduro and set his sights on other conflicts overseas.
“Donald Trump is reducing the United States to a regional bully with fewer allies and more enemies,” Rep. Gregory Meeks, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said during a floor debate. “This isn’t making America great again. It’s making us isolated and weak.”
Last week, Senate Republicans were only able to narrowly dismiss the Venezuela war powers resolution after the Trump administration persuaded two Republicans to back away from their earlier support. As part of that effort, Secretary of State Marco Rubio committed to a briefing next week before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Yet Trump’s insistence that the US will possess Greenland over the objections of Denmark, a NATO ally, has alarmed some Republicans on Capitol Hill. They have mounted some of the most outspoken objections to almost anything the president has done since taking office.
Trump this week backed away from military and tariff threats against European allies as he announced that his administration was working with NATO on a “framework of a future deal” on Arctic security.
But Bacon still expressed frustration with Trump’s aggressive foreign policy and voted for the war powers resolution even though it only applies to Venezuela.
“I’m tired of all the threats,” he said.
Trump’s recent military actions — and threats to do more — have reignited a decades-old debate in Congress over the War Powers Act, a law passed in the early 1970s by lawmakers looking to claw back their authority over military actions.
The war powers debate
The War Powers Resolution was passed in the Vietnam War era as the US sent troops to conflicts throughout Asia. It attempted to force presidents to work with Congress to deploy troops if there hasn’t already been a formal declaration of war.
Under the legislation, lawmakers can also force votes on legislation that directs the president to remove US forces from hostilities.
Presidents have long tested the limits of those parameters, and Democrats argue that Trump in his second term has pushed those limits farther than ever.
The Trump administration left Congress in the dark ahead of the surprise raid to capture Maduro. It has also used an evolving set of legal justifications to blow up alleged drug boats and seize sanctioned oil tankers near Venezuela.
Democrats question who gets to benefit from Venezuelan oil licenses
As the Trump administration oversees the sale of Venezuela’s petroleum worldwide, Senate Democrats are also questioning who is benefiting from the contracts.
In one of the first transactions, the US granted Vitol, the world’s largest independent oil broker, a license worth roughly $250 million. A senior partner at Vitol, John Addison, gave roughly $6 million to Trump-aligned political action committees during the presidential election, according to donation records compiled by OpenSecrets.
“Congress and the American people deserve full transparency regarding any financial commitments, promises, deals, or other arrangements related to Venezuela that could favor donors to the President’s campaign and political operation,” 13 Democratic senators wrote to White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles Thursday in a letter led by Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff of California.
The White House has said it is safeguarding the South American country’s oil for the benefit of both the people of Venezuela and the US