From street to gallery: Fathima Mohiuddin reimagines space in Ishara’s ‘No Trespassing’

Fathima Mohiuddin, known as Fatspatrol, is one of six featured artists in “No Trespassing,” a summer exhibition at Dubai’s Ishara Art Foundation. (Supplied)
Short Url
Updated 16 August 2025
Follow

From street to gallery: Fathima Mohiuddin reimagines space in Ishara’s ‘No Trespassing’

DUBAI: Dubai-born artist Fathima Mohiuddin, known as Fatspatrol, is one of six featured artists in “No Trespassing,” a summer exhibition at Dubai’s Ishara Art Foundation.

The show, which runs until Aug. 30, explores boundaries — physical, cultural, and institutional — through the lens of street art aesthetics recontextualized within the gallery’s white cube space.

“I’m not typically a gallery exhibiting artist,” Mohiuddin told Arab News. “I’ve spent a good part of my career as an artist and curator in street art because the urban art space has just felt like a more comfortable place for me.”




Fatspatrol, ‘The World Out There,’ 2025. (Supplied)

Mohiuddin, who recently returned to the UAE after seven years abroad, added: “I’m really glad to have landed right here in this show.”

Her work, titled “The World Out There,” explores the tension between personal identity and the outside world.

“Boundaries and restrictions have been a big part of not just my work but of things I’ve had to navigate in my life,” she said. “My work is very much about mark-making … to say, ‘I was here, I was unique in a world that doesn’t want me to be, and I mattered.’”

Mohiuddin initially planned to show small-scale works on reclaimed materials such as road signs and license plates, but found her pieces “looked really small and almost as if they were intimidated” by the space.

With curator Priyanka Mehra’s encouragement, she adopted a new approach. “I told Priyanka I wanted to bring in some texture and I’m going to paint with brooms.”

The result is a large-scale, layered installation that channels the grit and energy of the streets.

“To be able to loosen up and work freely without restriction and prerequisite was amazing. And brooms. I used brooms in my mark-making for the first time,” Mohiuddin said.

Through her personal, intuitive process, she hopes to provoke “a raw humanness” in viewers.

“Perhaps let’s say I hope it provokes a human response,” she added.


Review: Netflix’s ‘The New Yorker at 100’

Updated 14 December 2025
Follow

Review: Netflix’s ‘The New Yorker at 100’

  • Directed by Marshall Curry, the documentary opened the doors to the publication’s meticulous world, offering viewers a rare look inside the issues within the magazine’s issues

Out this month, Netflix’s “The New Yorker at 100” documentary marks the centennial of the weekly that has brought forth arguably some of the most compelling long-form journalism in my lifetime.

As a ferocious reader with an insatiable appetite for print, I vividly recall picking-up a copy of The New Yorker in Saudi Arabia after school as a teen, determined to read it cover-to-cover — only to find myself mentally, intellectually and physically exhausted after deciphering a single lyrical and Herculean-sized long-form piece.

Reading The New Yorker still makes one both feel smarter — and perhaps not smart enough — at the very same time. Just like the documentary.

Much like Vogue’s 2009 documentary, “The September Issue,” which followed (now retired) editor-in-chief Anna Wintour as she prepared for the September 2007 issue; this documentary largely centered on the making of the Feb. 17 & 24, 2025 multi-cover edition.

A quintessentially New York staple that readers either love or loathe — or both — the magazine has long been seen as a highbrow publication for the “elite.”

But The New Yorker is in on the joke. It never did take itself too seriously.

Directed by Marshall Curry, the documentary opened the doors to the publication’s meticulous world, offering viewers a rare look inside the issues within the magazine’s issues.

Narrated by actress Julianne Moore, it included sit-down interviews with famous figures, largely offering gushing testimonials.

It, of course, included many cameos from pop culture references such as from “Seinfeld,” “The Good Place” and others.

It also mentioned New Yorker’s famed late writers Anthony Bourdain and Truman Capote, and Ronan Farrow.

As a journalist myself, I enjoyed the behind-the-scenes peeks into staff meetings and editing discussions, including the line-by-line fact-checking process.

While lovingly headquartered in New York — and now based at One World Trade Center after decades in the heart of Times Square — the magazine has long published dispatches from elsewhere in the country and around the world.

I wish there had been more airtime dedicated to Jeanette “Jane” Cole Grant, who co-founded the magazine with her husband-at-the-time, Harold Ross, during the Roaring Twenties.

Ironically, neither founder hailed from New York — Grant arrived from Missouri at 16 to pursue singing before becoming a journalist on staff at The New York Times — and Ross came from a Colorado mining town.

Perhaps more bizarrely, Ross, who served as the first editor-in-chief of The New Yorker — known today for its intricate reporting and 11 Pulitzer Prizes — had dropped out of school at 13. He served as lead editor for 26 years until his death, guided by instinct and surrounded by talented writers he hired.

As the Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and the magazine’s fifth editor-in-chief, David Remnick has held the role since 1998. “It is a place that publishes a 15,000-word profile of a musician one week, a 9,000-word account from Southern Lebanon, with gag cartoons interspersed in them,” he said in one scene.

It also offered a glimpse of the leadership of his predecessor, the vivacious and provocative Tina Brown, who served as editor-in-chief for six years starting in 1992.

No woman has held the top editor position before or since her tenure.

Some of the most compelling moments in the documentary, for me, showed journalists scribbling in reporter notebooks in darkened movie theaters, rocking-out in dingy punk shows, and reporting from political rallies while life unfolded around them.

These journalists were not sitting in diners, merely chasing the money or seated in corner offices; they were on the ground, focused on accuracy and texture, intent on portraying what it meant to be a New Yorker who cared about the world, both beyond the city’s borders and within them.

While Arab bylines remain limited, the insights from current marginalized writers and editors showed how the magazine has been trying to diversify and include more contributors of color. They are still working on it.

A century in, this documentary feels like an issue of The New Yorker — except perhaps easier to complete.