From Silk Road to doorways: How Chinese chili peppers became Uzbekistan’s protective charm

A chili pepper garland is hung over the door of a household in Samarkand, Uzbekistan, Aug. 7, 2025. (AN Photo)
Short Url
Updated 14 August 2025
Follow

From Silk Road to doorways: How Chinese chili peppers became Uzbekistan’s protective charm

  • Chili pepper arrived in Central Asia from China, brought by spice caravans traveling the Silk Road
  • Known as kalampir, it became a dominant folk motif and is believed to have talismanic power

MARGILAN, Fergana Valley: Strung into garlands, hung above doorways, walls, and crafted into traditional textiles and ceramics, red hot chili peppers are a distinctive ornament in Uzbek culture: a legacy of ancient beliefs that made them amulets against the evil eye and demons.

Chilies most likely arrived in Central Asia from China, brought by spice caravans that traveled the Silk Road — the ancient trade network that for hundreds of years linked East Asia with the Middle East, Africa, and Europe.

Present-day Uzbekistan was a major crossroads on this route, which passed through the Fergana Valley in the east to Samarkand, Bukhara, and Khiva in the southwest.

In the region’s hot climate, the properties of red chili, which in Uzbek is known as kalampir, were quickly noticed and became valued.

“It not only added flavor to food but also helped preserve it. People noticed that the spice protected products from spoiling. In folk medicine, it was used to warm the body, reduce inflammation, and ‘drive away’ illness,” said Prof. Elmira Gyul of the “Silk Road” International Research Institute, Uzbekistan’s leading center for the study of Silk Road history and material culture.

“Over time, the pepper, prized for its beneficial properties, also acquired symbolic meaning — as a protector not only against disease but also against the evil eye, curses, and malevolent spirits such as jinn and the witch-like albasty.”

Not only the pepper itself but also its image was attributed to hold benevolent magical power. Gradually, it became a dominant motif in folk art, featured in Uzbek embroidery, ceramics, and handwoven palak fabrics, and often appeared alongside other talismanic symbols like almonds, needles, knives, and designs of traditional amulets and protective charms known as tumor or tumar.

“The tradition of depicting chili peppers was especially characteristic of the Fergana Valley, where this motif is found most frequently. This is likely connected to the fact that peppers were introduced to Central Asia from China,” Prof. Gyul said.

“For example, in the collection of the State Museum of Arts there is a Fergana embroidery on gray silk, where the central rosette is surrounded by a protective garland of bright red, meticulously rendered peppers. Interestingly, alongside them appear images of tumor jewelry amulets and stylized Arabic inscriptions, which in folk tradition were also perceived as talismans.”

While kalampir is used in Uzbek cuisine to add flavor and color, it is not a dominant spice or condiment. But chili peppers often appear as protective decoration on ceramic dishes, especially large ones used for communal meals, to safeguard the food from going bad.

Today, the motif of kalampir is most often associated with the famous black skullcap known as tubeteika or doppa, which originates from Chust in the Fergana Valley and is traditionally worn by Uzbek men on special occasions.

The monochrome cap is decorated with chili peppers painted or embroidered in white.

“This was originally a different symbol — the wings of khvarna, the divine blessing in Zoroastrianism, bestowed from the heavens,” Prof. Gyul said. “In the Islamic period, the original meaning gradually faded, and the wings transformed into the image of a chili pepper.”

Although these “peppers” were not kalampir at first, their protective function was already present and continues to this day.

There is a legend about the power of chili peppers that many Uzbek children hear at home. It is about a man who went to the mountains to find food for his family and encountered wolves.

“The only thing that saved him from this bunch of wolves and scared them off was the chili pepper. He came back later to his family with food and a symbol of protection, which then carried on for centuries,” said Kamila Erkaboyeva, a culture and tourism consultant.

“To this day, you will see a doppa hat with kalampir. It’s sharp-edged and something that protects us ... from a lot of things.”


Trump sues the BBC for defamation over editing of January 6 speech, seeks up to $10 billion in damages

Updated 59 min 28 sec ago
Follow

Trump sues the BBC for defamation over editing of January 6 speech, seeks up to $10 billion in damages

  • A BBC spokesperson told Reuters earlier on Monday that it had “no further contact from President Trump’s lawyers at this point
  • The BBC is funded through a mandatory license fee on all TV viewers, which UK lawyers say could make any payout to Trump politically fraught

WASHING: President Donald Trump sued the BBC on Monday for defamation over edited clips of a speech that made it appear he directed supporters to storm the US Capitol, opening an international front in his fight against media coverage he deems untrue or unfair. Trump accused Britain’s publicly owned broadcaster of defaming him by splicing together parts of a January 6, 2021 speech, including one section where he told supporters to march on the Capitol and another where he said “fight like hell.” It omitted a section in which he called for peaceful protest.
Trump’s lawsuit alleges the BBC defamed him and violated a Florida law that bars deceptive and unfair trade practices. He is seeking $5 billion in damages for each of the lawsuit’s two counts. The BBC has apologized to Trump, admitted an error of judgment and acknowledged that the edit gave the mistaken impression that he had made a direct call for violent action. But it has said there is no legal basis to sue.
Trump, in his lawsuit filed Monday in Miami federal court, said the BBC despite its apology “has made no showing of actual remorse for its wrongdoing nor meaningful institutional changes to prevent future journalistic abuses.”
The BBC is funded through a mandatory license fee on all TV viewers, which UK lawyers say could make any payout to Trump politically fraught.
A spokesman for Trump’s legal team said in a statement the BBC “has a long pattern of deceiving its audience in coverage of President Trump, all in service of its own leftist political agenda.”
A BBC spokesperson told Reuters earlier on Monday that it had “no further contact from President Trump’s lawyers at this point. Our position remains the same.” The broadcaster did not immediately respond to a request for comment after the lawsuit was filed.

CRISIS LED TO RESIGNATIONS
Facing one of the biggest crises in its 103-year history, the BBC has said it has no plans to rebroadcast the documentary on any of its platforms.
The dispute over the clip, featured on the BBC’s “Panorama” documentary show shortly before the 2024 presidential election, sparked a public relations crisis for the broadcaster, leading to the resignations of its two most senior officials.
Trump’s lawyers say the BBC caused him overwhelming reputational and financial harm.
The documentary drew scrutiny after the leak of a BBC memo by an external standards adviser that raised concerns about how it was edited, part of a wider investigation of political bias at the publicly funded broadcaster.
The documentary was not broadcast in the United States.
Trump may have sued in the US because defamation claims in Britain must be brought within a year of publication, a window that has closed for the “Panorama” episode.
To overcome the US Constitution’s legal protections for free speech and the press, Trump will need to prove not only that the edit was false and defamatory but also that the BBC knowingly misled viewers or acted recklessly.
The broadcaster could argue that the documentary was substantially true and its editing decisions did not create a false impression, legal experts said. It could also claim the program did not damage Trump’s reputation.
Other media have settled with Trump, including CBS and ABC when Trump sued them following his comeback win in the November 2024 election.
Trump has filed lawsuits against the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and a newspaper in Iowa, all three of which have denied wrongdoing. The attack on the US Capitol in January 2021 was aimed at blocking Congress from certifying Joe Biden’s presidential win over Trump in the 2020 US election.