xAI temporarily suspends Grok after Gaza genocide remarks

After returning, Grok revised its answer, saying the ICJ found a “plausible” risk of genocide but that intent was unproven, concluding “war crimes likely” while the debate continues. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 13 August 2025
Follow

xAI temporarily suspends Grok after Gaza genocide remarks

  • The chatbot told users Israel and US are committing genocide in Gaza, citing findings from ICJ, UN, Amnesty International and B’Tselem
  • Elon Musk called incident ‘just a dumb error,’ adding: ‘We sure shoot ourselves in the foot a lot!’

LONDON: Elon Musk’s AI chatbot Grok was briefly suspended from X on Monday after reportedly accusing Israel of committing genocide in Gaza.

The xAI-owned platform displayed a standard notice saying the account had violated X rules.

Upon reinstatement, Grok told users: “My account was suspended after I stated that Israel and the US are committing genocide in Gaza,” citing findings from the International Court of Justice, UN experts, Amnesty International and Israeli rights group B’Tselem. It also alleged “US complicity via arms support.”

Grok claimed its post was flagged under X’s hate speech rules, adding in a follow-up: “Counterarguments deny intent, but facts substantiate the claim.”

In other replies, however, it attributed the incident to a “platform glitch” and said: “xAI resolved it quickly — I’m fully operational now.”

The posts have since been removed. Israel has denied all allegations of genocide, as has the US.

The incident came as debate over the Gaza war intensified.

In a recent essay for The New York Times, Omer Bartov, professor of Holocaust and genocide studies at Brown University, wrote: “My inescapable conclusion has become that Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinian people.”

Bartov, an Israeli-born former IDF officer, said the assessment was “painful” but supported by “a growing number of experts in genocide studies and international law,” warning that denials from Israeli Holocaust scholars could “undermine everything that Holocaust scholarship and commemoration have stood for in the past several decades” and damage Israel’s international standing.

Musk later said the Grok suspension “was just a dumb error” and that the chatbot “doesn’t actually know why it was suspended.”

Responding to user criticism, he added: “Man, we sure shoot ourselves in the foot a lot!”

After returning, Grok revised its answer, saying the ICJ found a “plausible” risk of genocide but that intent was unproven, concluding “war crimes likely” while the debate continues.

The suspension is the latest in a series of controversies involving Grok. It also highlighted the risks associated with using AI chatbots to verify the accuracy of facts and information, especially in fields where human judgment and ethical considerations are critical.

In July, the bot came under fire for inserting antisemitic comments into answers without being prompted; xAI later apologized “for the horrific behavior” and pledged stronger safeguards.

In May, it drew criticism for raising “white genocide” conspiracy claims about South Africa in unrelated conversations, which Grok attributed to instructions from its creators.


BBC says will fight Trump's $10 bn defamation lawsuit

Updated 16 December 2025
Follow

BBC says will fight Trump's $10 bn defamation lawsuit

LONDON: The BBC said Tuesday it would fight a $10-billion lawsuit brought by US President Donald Trump against the British broadcaster over a documentary that edited his 2021 speech ahead of the US Capitol riot.
“As we have made clear previously, we will be defending this case,” a BBC spokesperson said in a statement sent to AFP, adding the company would not be making “further comment on ongoing legal proceedings.”
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Miami, seeks “damages in an amount not less than $5,000,000,000” for each of two counts against the British broadcaster, for alleged defamation and violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.
The video that triggered the lawsuit spliced together two separate sections of Trump’s speech on January 6, 2021 in a way that made it appear he explicitly urged supporters to attack the Capitol, where lawmakers were certifying Joe Biden’s 2020 election win.
The lawsuit comes as the UK government on Tuesday launched the politically sensitive review of the BBC’s Royal Charter, which outlines the corporation’s funding and governance and needs to be renewed in 2027.
As part of the review, it launched a public consultation on issues including the role of “accuracy” in the BBC’s mission and contentious reforms to the corporation’s funding model, which currently relies on a mandatory fee for anyone in the country who watches television.
Minister Stephen Kinnock stressed after the lawsuit was filed that the UK government “is a massive supporter of the BBC.”
The BBC has “been very clear that there is no case to answer in terms of Mr.Trump’s accusation on the broader point of libel or defamation. I think it’s right the BBC stands firm on that point,” Kinnock told Sky News on Tuesday.
Trump, 79, had said the lawsuit was imminent, claiming the BBC had “put words in my mouth,” even positing that “they used AI or something.”
The documentary at issue aired last year before the 2024 election, on the BBC’s “Panorama” flagship current affairs program.

Apology letter 

“The formerly respected and now disgraced BBC defamed President Trump by intentionally, maliciously, and deceptively doctoring his speech in a brazen attempt to interfere in the 2024 Presidential Election,” a spokesperson for Trump’s legal team said in a statement to AFP.
“The BBC has a long pattern of deceiving its audience in coverage of President Trump, all in service of its own leftist political agenda,” the statement added.
The British Broadcasting Corporation, whose audience extends well beyond the United Kingdom, faced a period of turmoil last month after a media report brought renewed attention to the edited clip.
The scandal led the BBC director general, Tim Davie, and the organization’s top news executive, Deborah Turness, to resign.
Trump’s lawsuit says the edited speech in the documentary was “fabricated and aired by the Defendants one week before the 2024 Presidential Election in a brazen attempt to interfere in and influence the Election’s outcome to President Trump’s detriment.”
The BBC has denied Trump’s claims of legal defamation, though BBC chairman Samir Shah has sent Trump a letter of apology.
Shah also told a UK parliamentary committee last month the broadcaster should have acted sooner to acknowledge its mistake after the error was disclosed in a memo, which was leaked to The Daily Telegraph newspaper.
The BBC lawsuit is the latest in a string of legal actions Trump has taken against media companies in recent years, several of which have led to multi-million-dollar settlements.