Amnesty tells London police to avoid arresting protesters supporting Palestine Action

Police officers block a street as pro-Palestinian demonstrators gather in protest against Home Secretary Yvette Cooper’s plan to proscribe Palestine Action, London, June 23, 2025. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 07 August 2025
Follow

Amnesty tells London police to avoid arresting protesters supporting Palestine Action

  • The group was listed as a terrorist organization on July 5 after members broke into an RAF airbase and damaged aircraft
  • A major protest in support of Palestine Action is set to take place in London on Saturday

LONDON: Amnesty International has warned London’s Metropolitan Police to avoid arresting protesters who show support for the banned group Palestine Action, The Guardian reported.

It comes ahead of a major protest planned for this Saturday in London, and as the number of people prosecuted for showing support for the organization continues to grow.

Three people who were arrested in Westminster in July and charged with showing support for a proscribed organization are due to appear in court on Sept. 16. Since Palestine Action was proscribed on July 5, police across the UK have arrested 221 people for suspected offenses under the Terrorism Act.

The pro-Palestinian group was listed as a terrorist organization after breaking into an RAF airbase on June 20 and damaging aircraft.

The protest in support of the group this weekend will take place in Parliament Square, central London. The organizer, pressure group Defend Our Juries, has requested that protesters hold signs saying: “I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action.”

Dominic Murphy, the chief of the Metropolitan Police’s counterterrorism unit, cautioned people against showing support for the group.

“I would strongly advise anyone planning to come to London this weekend to show support for Palestine Action to think about the potential criminal consequences of their actions,” he said.

In a letter to London’s police chief, Mark Rowley, Amnesty International UK called for officers to show “restraint” during Saturday’s protest.

Signed by CEO Sacha Deshmukh, it said any arrests of peaceful protesters simply for holding placards would violate the UK’s international obligations to protect freedom of expression and assembly.

“As such, we urge you to instruct your officers to comply with the UK’s international obligations and act with restraint in their response to any such protests that occur, by not arresting protesters who are merely carrying placards that state they oppose genocide and support Palestine Action,” it added.

On Wednesday, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, who was responsible for proscribing the group, said she did so after a “unanimous recommendation by the expert cross-government proscription review group.”

She added: “It also follows disturbing information referencing planning for further attacks, the details of which cannot yet be publicly reported due to ongoing legal proceedings.

“Those who seek to support this group may yet not know the true nature of the organization. But people should be under no illusion — this is not a peaceful or nonviolent protest group.”


Trump sues the BBC for defamation over editing of January 6 speech, seeks up to $10 billion in damages

Updated 16 December 2025
Follow

Trump sues the BBC for defamation over editing of January 6 speech, seeks up to $10 billion in damages

  • A BBC spokesperson told Reuters earlier on Monday that it had “no further contact from President Trump’s lawyers at this point
  • The BBC is funded through a mandatory license fee on all TV viewers, which UK lawyers say could make any payout to Trump politically fraught

WASHING: President Donald Trump sued the BBC on Monday for defamation over edited clips of a speech that made it appear he directed supporters to storm the US Capitol, opening an international front in his fight against media coverage he deems untrue or unfair. Trump accused Britain’s publicly owned broadcaster of defaming him by splicing together parts of a January 6, 2021 speech, including one section where he told supporters to march on the Capitol and another where he said “fight like hell.” It omitted a section in which he called for peaceful protest.
Trump’s lawsuit alleges the BBC defamed him and violated a Florida law that bars deceptive and unfair trade practices. He is seeking $5 billion in damages for each of the lawsuit’s two counts. The BBC has apologized to Trump, admitted an error of judgment and acknowledged that the edit gave the mistaken impression that he had made a direct call for violent action. But it has said there is no legal basis to sue.
Trump, in his lawsuit filed Monday in Miami federal court, said the BBC despite its apology “has made no showing of actual remorse for its wrongdoing nor meaningful institutional changes to prevent future journalistic abuses.”
The BBC is funded through a mandatory license fee on all TV viewers, which UK lawyers say could make any payout to Trump politically fraught.
A spokesman for Trump’s legal team said in a statement the BBC “has a long pattern of deceiving its audience in coverage of President Trump, all in service of its own leftist political agenda.”
A BBC spokesperson told Reuters earlier on Monday that it had “no further contact from President Trump’s lawyers at this point. Our position remains the same.” The broadcaster did not immediately respond to a request for comment after the lawsuit was filed.

CRISIS LED TO RESIGNATIONS
Facing one of the biggest crises in its 103-year history, the BBC has said it has no plans to rebroadcast the documentary on any of its platforms.
The dispute over the clip, featured on the BBC’s “Panorama” documentary show shortly before the 2024 presidential election, sparked a public relations crisis for the broadcaster, leading to the resignations of its two most senior officials.
Trump’s lawyers say the BBC caused him overwhelming reputational and financial harm.
The documentary drew scrutiny after the leak of a BBC memo by an external standards adviser that raised concerns about how it was edited, part of a wider investigation of political bias at the publicly funded broadcaster.
The documentary was not broadcast in the United States.
Trump may have sued in the US because defamation claims in Britain must be brought within a year of publication, a window that has closed for the “Panorama” episode.
To overcome the US Constitution’s legal protections for free speech and the press, Trump will need to prove not only that the edit was false and defamatory but also that the BBC knowingly misled viewers or acted recklessly.
The broadcaster could argue that the documentary was substantially true and its editing decisions did not create a false impression, legal experts said. It could also claim the program did not damage Trump’s reputation.
Other media have settled with Trump, including CBS and ABC when Trump sued them following his comeback win in the November 2024 election.
Trump has filed lawsuits against the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and a newspaper in Iowa, all three of which have denied wrongdoing. The attack on the US Capitol in January 2021 was aimed at blocking Congress from certifying Joe Biden’s presidential win over Trump in the 2020 US election.