LONDON: British Prime Minister Keir Starmer marks a year in office this week, fighting a rebellion from his own party over welfare reform and reckoning with a sluggish economy and rock-bottom approval ratings.
It’s a long way from the landslide election victory he won on July 4, 2024, when Starmer’s center-left Labour Party took 412 of the 650 seats in the House of Commons to end 14 years of Conservative government.
In the last 12 months Starmer has navigated the rapids of a turbulent world, winning praise for rallying international support for Ukraine and persuading US President Donald Trump to sign a trade deal easing tariffs on UK goods.
But at home his agenda has run onto the rocks as he struggles to convince British voters — and his own party — that his government is delivering the change that it promised. Inflation remains stubbornly high and economic growth low, frustrating efforts to ease the cost of living. Starmer’s personal approval ratings are approaching those of Conservative Prime Minister Liz Truss, who lasted just 49 days in office in 2022 after her tax-cutting budget roiled the economy.
John Curtice, a political scientist at the University of Strathclyde, said Starmer has had “the worst start for any newly elected prime minister.”
Rebellion over welfare reform
On Tuesday, Starmer faces a vote in Parliament on welfare spending after watering down planned cuts to disability benefits that caused consternation from Labour lawmakers. Many balked at plans to raise the threshold for the payments by requiring a more severe physical or mental disability, a move the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank estimated would cut the income of 3.2 million people by 2030.
After more than 120 Labour lawmakers said they would vote against the bill, the government offered concessions, including a guarantee that no one currently getting benefits will be affected by the change. It pledged to consult with disability groups about the changes, and do more to help sick and disabled people find jobs.
Some rebels said they would back the bill after the concessions, but others maintained their opposition.
The welfare U-turn is the third time in a few weeks that the government has reversed course on a policy under pressure. In May, it dropped a plan to end winter home heating subsidies for millions of retirees. Last week, Starmer announced a national inquiry into organized child sexual abuse, something he was pressured to do by opposition politicians — and Elon Musk.
“It’s a failure of leadership for a prime minister with such a big majority to not be able to get their agenda through,” said Rob Ford, professor of politics at the University of Manchester. “I can’t think of many examples of a prime minister in postwar politics suffering such a big setback when presiding over such a strong position in the Commons.”
It also makes it harder for the government to find money to invest in public services without raising taxes. The government estimated the welfare reforms would save 5 billion pounds ($7 billion) a year from a welfare bill that has ballooned since the COVID-19 pandemic. After the concessions, it’s only likely to save about half that amount.
Starmer acknowledges errors
The government argues that it has achieved much in its first year: It has raised the minimum wage, strengthened workers’ rights, launched new social housing projects and pumped money into the state-funded health system. But it has also raised taxes for employers and farmers, as well as squeezing benefits, blaming previous Conservative governments for the need to make tough choices. That downbeat argument has done little to make Starmer popular.
In recent days Starmer has acknowledged mistakes. He told the Sunday Times that he was “heavily focused on what was happening with NATO and the Middle East” while the welfare rebellion was brewing at home.
“I’d have liked to get to a better position with colleagues sooner than we did — that’s for sure,” he said.
UK politics is in flux
Starmer’s struggles are all the more ignominious because the opposition Conservative Party had its worst-ever election result in 2024, reduced to only 121 lawmakers.
But British politics is in unpredictable flux. A big chunk of Conservative support – and some of Labour’s – shifted in this year’s local elections to Reform UK, a hard-right party led by veteran political pressure-cooker Nigel Farage. Reform has just five legislators in the House of Commons but regularly comes out on top in opinion polls, ahead of Labour and pushing the right-of-center Conservatives into third place. If the shift continues it could end a century of dominance by the two big parties.
Starmer’s key asset at the moment is time. He does not have to call an election until 2029.
“There’s still plenty of time to turn things around,” Ford said. But he said the Labour lawmakers’ rebellion “will make things harder going forward, because it’s not like this is the end of difficult decisions that he’s going to have to make in government.
“Barring some magical unexpected economic boom … there’s going to be a hell of a lot more fights to come,” he said.
Starmer faces down a revolt over welfare reform after a troubled first year in office
Short Url
https://arab.news/v39f7
Starmer faces down a revolt over welfare reform after a troubled first year in office
- On Tuesday, Starmer faces a vote in Parliament on welfare spending after watering down planned cuts to disability benefits that caused consternation from Labour lawmakers
- The welfare U-turn is the third time in a few weeks that the government has reversed course on a policy under pressure
From AI to Starlink: how drone tech is reshaping war in Ukraine
KYIV: As the war in Ukraine drags into its fifth year, drones have come to completely dominate the front line — a transformation in modern warfare that is being watched around the world.
Here is a look at the technology that is reshaping the war, four years after Russia launched its full-scale invasion by pouring tanks and men over the border:
- Kill zone -
Ranging from cheap commercial devices designed for civilian use to explosive-packed miniature aircraft, drones are responsible for up to 80 percent of battlefield damage, Ukraine’s Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov has said.
“Modern warfare is now impossible without drones,” Koleso, a Ukrainian infantry soldier, told AFP in eastern Ukraine.
The front line has been transformed into a “kill zone” stretching up to 20 kilometers (12 miles) deep — “an area between two sides where nothing can survive because it’s constantly monitored by drones,” military expert Kateryna Bondar explained.
Soldiers can only operate there in small groups, moving fast and with their eyes fixed to the sky, hoping to stay undetected.
Heavy pieces of artillery, as well as sluggish tanks and armored vehicles, are too slow and visible — making them easy targets for both sides.
Unwilling to send more men that necessary into the kill zone, Ukrainian troops use ground drones to ferry supplies to dangerous areas and to evacuate wounded soldiers.
- Fibre optics -
Maintaining a stable connection between the drone and its operator, controlling it remotely, is a crucial task.
“That’s where the real race is happening — communications and connections,” Bondar said.
Initially, most drones operated on a radio connection.
But they proved vulnerable to electronic warfare — the practice of jamming and intercepting enemy craft, causing them to drop out of the sky or lose connection to the operator.
Russia has turned to drones controlled by ultra-thin fiber-optic cables, largely immune to electronic jamming.
In scenes that resemble a dystopian sci-fi movie, their widespread use has left swathes of frontline cities and fields entombed in webs of cable.
- Starlink -
In another alternative to radio control, Ukrainians have begun attaching Starlink terminals to drones.
This allows them to fly using a satellite Internet connection.
“We need to fly far away with a stable video signal and stable control,” said Phoenix, a commander from Ukraine’s Lasar Group, a pioneer in the use of Starlink.
Russian troops soon started copying, until Ukraine pushed Elon Musk last month to disable unauthorized Russian terminals.
The move disrupted both Russian and Ukrainian systems, military observers said.
The US-based Institute for the Study of War said the switch-off likely helped enable a localized, but rapid, Ukrainian advance in the southern Zaporizhzhia region in early February.
- Air defenses -
The spread of drones has forced a revamp of air defense systems.
Firing advanced missiles — which can cost millions — to down drones worth just a fraction of that is too expensive a response.
Alongside jamming, Ukraine has also developed cheap interceptor drones built specially to destroy other craft mid-air.
“We opened the chapter of the war of drones with drones,” said Marko Kushnir of General Cherry, a leading interceptor drone maker.
Roads near the front have been equipped with protective nets attempting to stop attacking drones, while trucks fitted with anti-drone cages and drone jammers speed along them.
Machine guns are also a last resort to shoot down drones from the sky.
Ukraine’s Western allies have increasingly looked to Kyiv’s experience after Russian drones made repeat incursions into European airspace in recent months.
- AI -
Engineers are racing to equip drones with artificial intelligence to improve their performance.
Ukrainian firms such as The Fourth Law (TFL) say they have developed so-called terminal guidance, which allows AI to take control of a device in the final moments before impact.
This is meant to improve the accuracy of strikes, especially as connection is typically lost in the final moments before a hit.
“Russia and China are also developing such technologies, and if our countries don’t... we will lose,” said TFL’s Maksym Savanevskyi.
But full autonomy remains some way off.
“AI is performing a helping function rather than substituting human,” said Bondar, the military expert.
“I thought they could simply remove people from battle equipment, that it could be fully automated. That’s a naive view,” said former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, now head of SwiftBeat, a company that supplies AI drones to Ukraine’s army.
“For the foreseeable future, you’ll have drones first, people second,” he told a conference in Kyiv.
All the way on the eastern front, Koleso said foot soldiers would always remain relevant.
“Until you plant the flag yourself, with your own hands, and take the position, it cannot be considered yours,” he said.
Here is a look at the technology that is reshaping the war, four years after Russia launched its full-scale invasion by pouring tanks and men over the border:
- Kill zone -
Ranging from cheap commercial devices designed for civilian use to explosive-packed miniature aircraft, drones are responsible for up to 80 percent of battlefield damage, Ukraine’s Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov has said.
“Modern warfare is now impossible without drones,” Koleso, a Ukrainian infantry soldier, told AFP in eastern Ukraine.
The front line has been transformed into a “kill zone” stretching up to 20 kilometers (12 miles) deep — “an area between two sides where nothing can survive because it’s constantly monitored by drones,” military expert Kateryna Bondar explained.
Soldiers can only operate there in small groups, moving fast and with their eyes fixed to the sky, hoping to stay undetected.
Heavy pieces of artillery, as well as sluggish tanks and armored vehicles, are too slow and visible — making them easy targets for both sides.
Unwilling to send more men that necessary into the kill zone, Ukrainian troops use ground drones to ferry supplies to dangerous areas and to evacuate wounded soldiers.
- Fibre optics -
Maintaining a stable connection between the drone and its operator, controlling it remotely, is a crucial task.
“That’s where the real race is happening — communications and connections,” Bondar said.
Initially, most drones operated on a radio connection.
But they proved vulnerable to electronic warfare — the practice of jamming and intercepting enemy craft, causing them to drop out of the sky or lose connection to the operator.
Russia has turned to drones controlled by ultra-thin fiber-optic cables, largely immune to electronic jamming.
In scenes that resemble a dystopian sci-fi movie, their widespread use has left swathes of frontline cities and fields entombed in webs of cable.
- Starlink -
In another alternative to radio control, Ukrainians have begun attaching Starlink terminals to drones.
This allows them to fly using a satellite Internet connection.
“We need to fly far away with a stable video signal and stable control,” said Phoenix, a commander from Ukraine’s Lasar Group, a pioneer in the use of Starlink.
Russian troops soon started copying, until Ukraine pushed Elon Musk last month to disable unauthorized Russian terminals.
The move disrupted both Russian and Ukrainian systems, military observers said.
The US-based Institute for the Study of War said the switch-off likely helped enable a localized, but rapid, Ukrainian advance in the southern Zaporizhzhia region in early February.
- Air defenses -
The spread of drones has forced a revamp of air defense systems.
Firing advanced missiles — which can cost millions — to down drones worth just a fraction of that is too expensive a response.
Alongside jamming, Ukraine has also developed cheap interceptor drones built specially to destroy other craft mid-air.
“We opened the chapter of the war of drones with drones,” said Marko Kushnir of General Cherry, a leading interceptor drone maker.
Roads near the front have been equipped with protective nets attempting to stop attacking drones, while trucks fitted with anti-drone cages and drone jammers speed along them.
Machine guns are also a last resort to shoot down drones from the sky.
Ukraine’s Western allies have increasingly looked to Kyiv’s experience after Russian drones made repeat incursions into European airspace in recent months.
- AI -
Engineers are racing to equip drones with artificial intelligence to improve their performance.
Ukrainian firms such as The Fourth Law (TFL) say they have developed so-called terminal guidance, which allows AI to take control of a device in the final moments before impact.
This is meant to improve the accuracy of strikes, especially as connection is typically lost in the final moments before a hit.
“Russia and China are also developing such technologies, and if our countries don’t... we will lose,” said TFL’s Maksym Savanevskyi.
But full autonomy remains some way off.
“AI is performing a helping function rather than substituting human,” said Bondar, the military expert.
“I thought they could simply remove people from battle equipment, that it could be fully automated. That’s a naive view,” said former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, now head of SwiftBeat, a company that supplies AI drones to Ukraine’s army.
“For the foreseeable future, you’ll have drones first, people second,” he told a conference in Kyiv.
All the way on the eastern front, Koleso said foot soldiers would always remain relevant.
“Until you plant the flag yourself, with your own hands, and take the position, it cannot be considered yours,” he said.
© 2026 SAUDI RESEARCH & PUBLISHING COMPANY, All Rights Reserved And subject to Terms of Use Agreement.










