Review: Star-filled ‘Eddington’ — a satirical thriller in small town America

Short Url
Updated 28 May 2025
Follow

Review: Star-filled ‘Eddington’ — a satirical thriller in small town America

CANNES: The memory of the COVID-19 pandemic still lingers, the deaths and the economic destruction it caused still play on the mind. Ari Aster’s “Eddington,” which just played at the Cannes Film Festival in France, is a brutal look at what the virus did to humanity, the kind of misinformation we were fed and the losses, monetary and emotional, we all suffered.

“Eddington” is a fictional town in the US state of New Mexico and the movie opens as lockdown begins.

In the Cannes title, the mayor of Eddington, Ted Garcia (Pedro Pascal), and Sheriff Joe Cross (Joaquin Phoenix) are at loggerheads. Their bone of contention is the medical mask — Cross refuses to wear one thus setting a bad example, encouraging people to defy the rule.  Cross also resents Garcia's support for the construction of a giant online server farm and decides to run against Garcia as an anti-lockdown candidate in the upcoming mayoral election.

This forms the main plot, but interestingly it is the sub-plots that add pep and zing to the film. Cross's wife Louise (Emma Stone) suffers from hysteria and depression while Garcia's problematic teen son Eric (Matt Gomez Hidaka) is in love with Sarah (Amelia Hoeferie), who bills herself a warrior for social justice.

Aster manages to grip us with all these diversions and distractions in what could have otherwise been a rather dull narrative. The satire on the sidelines is hilarious, and despite a serious plot that treats the town as a microcosm of America’s problems — from police brutality to racism —   the writer-director manages to keep the audience engaged until the finish line.

The film could have done with tighter editing, though, and it isn’t till the halfway mark that the plot begins to speed up with a segway into a farcical crime thriller.


Review: Netflix docuseries highlights the ugly truth of ‘America’s Next Top Model’

Updated 25 February 2026
Follow

Review: Netflix docuseries highlights the ugly truth of ‘America’s Next Top Model’

DHAHRAN: Out this month, nearly a decade after the successful show went off air, there is understandably a lot to unpack in Netflix’s three-episode documentary series “Reality Check: Inside America’s Next Top Model.”

Premiering in 2003 and running for 24 seasons until 2018, “America’s Next Top Model” invited aspiring models from across America to compete for a coveted modeling contract, and a glossy magazine cover (remember those?).

All this while juggling growing pains, random challenges cooked up by producers, marvelously messy makeovers, photoshoots, and living — and competing — with fellow contestants.

What could go wrong? Turns out — plenty. The show’s intimate format made for compelling TV.

Tyra Banks, one of America’s top models, was the show’s brainchild.

The young contestants were impressionable and eager, full of sky-high dreams and sky-high heels. They came from fractured backgrounds or from small towns. They were meant to have a mentor in Banks.

Instead, their deepest, most shameful moments were broadcast for the world to see. To my knowledge, while some contestants became semi-successful, none truly reached the “top model” level.

The docuseries hits like a punch in the face. And maybe that is the point.

Three episodes, each just an hour long, barely scratches the surface of the trauma, chaos, and behind-the-scenes drama on and off the screen.

The series is essentially a catwalk down nostalgia lane — but the road is uneven and swerving, much like the show itself. The style of filming is also similar to the show, which makes it all the more compelling for avid fans.

Designed for the TikTok-and-meme generation, these bite-sized scenes in the docuseries are tailor-made for viral clips.

Banks appears alone in every scene. Speaking directly at the camera, she seems to shrug through every apology and justify her past behavior.

The docuseries highlights interviews with main judges: Jay Manuel, Nigel Barker, and most prominently, a shocking update on beloved judge J. Alexander, known as “Miss J.” All claim to be estranged from Banks.

A few former contestants are also featured, each seated alone as tears or rage bubble to the surface. Nobody speaks favorably about Banks, especially while replaying clips showing her old judging panels.

Was this backlash justified? Are the vicious things said about Banks fair? The docuseries offers viewers the chance to be the judge in what invariably turns into a trial of Banks and her role on the show.

The docuseries ends on a cliffhanger, teasing a possible revival for cycle 25. Mixed feelings aside, there is clearly an audience for it.