Hope, apprehension and politics: Cardinals search for new pope

Cardinal Matteo Zuppi arrives in Saint Peter’s Basilica, as the body of Pope Francis is carried in a coffin inside the Basilica, on the day of its translation, at the Vatican, Apr. 23, 2025. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 25 April 2025
Follow

Hope, apprehension and politics: Cardinals search for new pope

  • “We have to make decisions for the whole Church, so we really need to pray for ourselves,” added Luxembourg’s Jean-Claude Hollerich
  • The conclave is likely to begin right after the nine days of mourning declared by the Holy See, which end on May 4

VATICAN CITY: Arriving in Rome after Pope Francis’s death, Catholic cardinals have admitted some apprehension at the responsibility of choosing his successor, as they begin setting out what they hope to see in the next head of the Church.
The task of choosing a new pope to replace the Argentine, who died on Monday aged 88, “is beyond us and yet requires us,” said French cardinal Jean-Marc Aveline, summing up the mood after celebrating a mass on Thursday evening.
“We feel very small. We have to make decisions for the whole Church, so we really need to pray for ourselves,” added Luxembourg’s Jean-Claude Hollerich, a Jesuit who was a close adviser to Francis.
The conclave is likely to begin right after the nine days of mourning declared by the Holy See, which end on May 4, he said, adding that he was approaching the occasion with “great hope” but also “a certain apprehension.”
Cardinal electors — those aged under 80 — will choose a new leader for the 1.4-billion-strong Roman Catholic church behind the closed doors of the Sistine Chapel.
Playing out under Michelangelo’s frescoes, the process is often perceived as full of intrigue and machinations.
But Cardinal Francois-Xavier Bustillo, the bishop of Ajaccio in Corsica, said his fellow cardinals should eschew political games and listen to each other before deciding.
We must not act tactically or strategically,” he said. “We must serve and act responsibly.”

On Friday morning, all cardinals already in Rome — electors and those who are too old — gathered at the Vatican for their fourth meeting since Francis’s death.
Known as “general congregations,” these gatherings provide an opportunity to exchange views and discuss the priorities of the next pontificate.
With their trademark scarlet skullcaps, cardinals are not hard to spot around the colonnades of St. Peter’s Square — something that makes them an easy target for journalists hoping to get a steer on who the next pope might be.
“There’s a good atmosphere between us. It’s you who make the predictions,” Italy’s Fernando Filoni quipped to reporters as he entered a meeting. “We’re getting to know each other.”
Francis, who appointed 80 percent of the 135 electors eligible to choose his successor, prioritized the Global South and far-flung regions away from Rome when picking new cardinals.
British cardinal Vincent Nichols said the prospect of choosing the next pope was “quite intimidating frankly.”
Cardinals would do their “best work once the doors of the conclave have been shut,” he told the BBC, adding seclusion would allow for “peace and a prayerfulness between us.”
Yet cardinals have discretely begun work to narrow the list of candidates.
Asked whether the time had come for an African or Asian pope, Archbishop Hollerich replied: “Why not? But it’s not a given.”
Skills and personality were more important than geography, he said, adding that a pope would always be a unifying figure.
The ideal candidate would be a “simple man” who is “not too young nor too old,” “can connect with people” and “knows how to listen” to both those on the left and on the right, he said.
However German cardinal Gerhard Muller, a staunch conservative who was among the leading voices opposing Francis’s progressive approach, said the Church risked a schism if it elected another liberal.
“The question is not between conservatives and liberals but between orthodoxy and heresy,” he told British newspaper The Times.
Oscar Rodriguez Maradiaga of Honduras said he hoped for a pontiff who would carry Francis’s torch.
“A simple, humble person. A pontiff who will break up the power struggles in the Church,” he told Italian daily La Stampa.
Aged 82, he will not have a say in the selection but remains hopeful.
“I am convinced that in the end everyone will have common sense. Cardinals are not people without faith,” he said.


US warns UK to stop arresting Palestine Action supporters

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

US warns UK to stop arresting Palestine Action supporters

  • Undersecretary of state for diplomacy: Arrests doing ‘more harm than good’ and ‘censoring’ free speech
  • Group was banned in July 2025 after series of break-ins

LONDON: UK authorities should stop arresting protesters showing support for banned group Palestine Action, the White House has warned.

The US undersecretary of state for diplomacy said arrests are doing “more harm than good” and are “censoring” free speech.

Sarah Rogers told news site Semafor: “I would have to look at each individual person and each proscribed organization. I think if you support an organization like Hamas, then depending upon whether you’re coordinating, there are all these standards that get applied.

“This Palestine Action group, I’ve seen it written about. I don’t know what it did. I think if you just merely stand up and say, ‘I support Palestine Action’, then unless you are really coordinating with some violent foreign terrorist, I think that censoring that speech does more harm than good.”

So far, more than 2,000 people have been arrested in the UK for showing support for the group.

It was banned in July 2025 after a series of break-ins nationwide, including at a facility owned by a defense manufacturer and a Royal Air Force base, during which military aircraft were damaged.

Last year, Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg was among those arrested while protesting for Palestine Action.

The group is challenging its ban, saying it should not be compared to terrorist organizations such as the Irish Republican Army, Daesh or Al-Qaeda.

The ban has been criticized by numerous bodies, with Amnesty International calling it a case of “problematic, overly broad and draconian restrictions on free speech.”

In Scotland, prosecutors have been offering to drop charges against some protesters in return for accepting a fine of £100 ($134.30). 

Adam McGibbon, who was arrested at a demonstration in Edinburgh last year, refused the offer, saying: “The fact that the authorities are offering fines equivalent to a parking ticket for a ‘terrorism offence’ shows just how ridiculous these charges are. Do supporters of (Daesh) get the same deal?

“I refuse to pay this fine, as has everyone else I know who has been offered one. Just try and put all 3,000 of us who have defied this ban so far in jail.”

Rogers said the UK is also wrong to arrest people using the phrase “globalize the intifada” while demonstrating in support of Palestine, after police in Manchester said in December that it would detain people chanting it.

“I’m from New York City where thousands of people were murdered by jihadists,” she said. referring to the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. “I don’t want an intifada in New York City, and I think anyone who does is disgusting, but should it be legal to say in most contexts? Yes.”