What We Are Reading Today: ‘Total Eclipse’

Photo/Supplied
Short Url
Updated 28 March 2025
Follow

What We Are Reading Today: ‘Total Eclipse’

  • Dillard admits she is shaken, haunted by the void’s indifference

Author: Annie Dillard

Annie Dillard’s essay “Total Eclipse” begins with stale coffee and roadside chatter but detonates into a primal reckoning with the universe’s indifference.

Published in her 1982 collection “Teaching a Stone to Talk,” the essay documents Dillard’s experience of the 1979 solar eclipse, transforming a celestial event into a visceral confrontation with human fragility.

Dillard lulls readers with the mundane: tourists snapping photos, jokes about “eclipse burgers,” and the nervous anticipation of a crowd waiting for darkness.

Then, with the moon’s first bite into the sun, her prose turns feral. Colors warp, the sky bleeds, as if reality were glitching. This is not a mere description; it is an assault on our trust in the ordinary.

The essay’s power lies in its unflinching honesty. When totality hits, Dillard does not romanticize awe or resilience. Instead, she strips humanity bare: we are temporary creatures dwarfed by cosmic forces. The vanished sun becomes a “black pupil,” the landscape a “film reel skipping.”

Unlike typical nature writing that seeks solace in beauty, “Total Eclipse” offers no comfort. The returning sunlight feels like a lie, the restored world a fragile façade.

Dillard admits she is shaken, haunted by the void’s indifference. It is this refusal to soften the blow that makes the essay endure. In an age of curated awe, her words are a gut-punch reminder: darkness does not care if we blink.  

Stylistically, Dillard masterfully mirrors the eclipse’s arc — calm, chaos, uneasy calm. This is not a science lesson or a spiritual guide, but a raw testimony that some truths cannot be explained, only endured.  

“Total Eclipse” remains vital because it dares to stare into the abyss without blinking. Dillard does not ask us to find meaning but to confront how little meaning there is to find.

And in that confrontation, there is a strange kind of clarity: to see our smallness is to glimpse the universe, unforgiving and vast.

 


What We Are Reading Today: Michelangelo and Titian

Photo/Supplied
Updated 06 February 2026
Follow

What We Are Reading Today: Michelangelo and Titian

Author: William E. Wallace

In 1529, Michelangelo was in Venice when he first met Titian, Venice’s famed painter of princes, gods, and goddesses. Coming face-to-face with Titian’s drama-infused, richly colored works, the creator of David and the Sistine Chapel ceiling realized he had met a worthy opponent. Twenty-five years later, Titian came to Rome to paint the pope, and the two met again. Painting in the Vatican, Titian experienced the full power of Michelangelo’s work and vowed to surpass the achievements of his older contemporary.

Michelangelo and Titian is the untold story of history’s greatest artistic rivalry, a competition between two monumental figures more admiring of one another than either would ever admit. William Wallace brings the world of the 16th century to life, and in particular its culture of gossip and intrigue.

Wallace challenges the established narrative of this relationship as mostly one-sided, with the younger artist in competition with the reigning master.