Faced with Russia, EU’s defense must include Turkiye

Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan speaks as he attends a press conference with Indonesia's President Prabowo Subianto (not pictured) after their bilateral meeting and signings of cooperation agreements at the presidential palace in Bogor, West Java on February 12, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 08 March 2025
Follow

Faced with Russia, EU’s defense must include Turkiye

  • “Sales to European countries, particularly EU members, add credibility to Turkiye’s argument it is an important player in European security,” said IISS expert Tom Waldyn
  • For Nebahat Tanriverdi Yasar, an independent researcher and policy analyst who works in Ankara and Berlin, Turkiye’s careful management of its ties with both Kyiv and Moscow has left it in a unique position

ISTANBUL: Turkiye, with NATO’s second-largest army and a Black Sea coastline, is looking to play a key role in Europe’s security after Washington’s pivot away from the region.
After two rounds of crisis talks on Ukraine and security following Washington’s change of policy, Ankara has been quick to warn that European defenses cannot be ensured without its involvement.
“It is inconceivable to establish European security without Turkiye,” President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said after Sunday’s London summit.
Without Turkiye, “it is becoming increasingly impossible for Europe to continue its role as a global actor,” he added.
A senior Turkish defense ministry returned to the issue on Thursday.
“With the security parameters being reshaped due to recent developments, it is impossible to ensure European security without Turkiye,” he said.
Even so, he said Turkiye would be ready to deploy troops to Ukraine as part of a peacekeeping mission “if deemed necessary.”
Ankara has consistently defended Ukraine’s territorial integrity since Russia’s 2022 invasion and supplied it with combat drones and naval vessels.
But it has also maintained good ties with Russia and remains the only NATO member not to have joined the sanctions against Moscow.

With its unique position between the two warring parties, Turkiye has repeatedly offered to host peace talks.
Erdogan and Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan have often received visitors such as Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky.
In recent years, Turkiye has considerably developed its defense industries, with exports growing by 29 percent to reach $7.1 billion in 2024, placing it 11th in global defense exports, Erdogan said in January.
Driving its success are the Bayraktar TB2 drones which have been sold to more than 25 nations, among them Poland and Romania, according to the International Institute for Strategic Studies’ Military Balance survey.
“Sales to European countries, particularly EU members, add credibility to Turkiye’s argument it is an important player in European security,” said IISS expert Tom Waldyn.
Its military, strategically located on the eastern flank of the Atlantic Alliance and south of the Black Sea — to which it controls access via the Bosphorus — counts 373,200 active troops and another 378,700 reservists, IISS figures show.
And these troops have been engaged in regular combat in northeastern Syria and northern Iraq fighting Kurdish insurgents, according to a Western diplomat.

“Turkiye has maintained a consistent attitude in line with the UN Charter on the sovereignty and territorial integrity” of Ukraine, he told AFP.
“It has the second largest military in NATO but also the most effective as it’s been in combat for decades,” he explained.
But EU cooperation with Ankara has been hampered by the Cyprus dispute, he said with a trace of exasperation.
“How long can we afford to continue this stance?“
For Nebahat Tanriverdi Yasar, an independent researcher and policy analyst who works in Ankara and Berlin, Turkiye’s careful management of its ties with both Kyiv and Moscow has left it in a unique position.
“Turkiye aims to carefully navigate its relations with Russia and its strategic defense support to Ukraine — potentially with EU backing — to reshape the balance of power in the region amid the emergence of a ‘new order’ where the EU seeks to assume greater responsibility for its security amid shifting US policies,” she told AFP.
Given the challenges that entailed, Ankara was “likely to pursue a pragmatic approach in the short term, focusing on expanding its mediation efforts, deepening defense cooperation with select European states, and leveraging its defense industry to address emerging gaps in military support,” she added.
But Sumbul Kaya, a political scientist in France argued that Turkiye was “above all, driven by a desire to defend its own interests.
“It only intervenes in neighboring countries for internal security reasons, such as in Syria and Iraq,” she said.
“But there’s no question of sending troops to fight wars everywhere — that would not go down well with the population.
“This crisis is an opportunity to stress that Turkiye is both a NATO member and a candidate for membership in the EU.”

 


UK pays Guantanamo detainee ‘substantial’ compensation over US torture questions

Updated 12 January 2026
Follow

UK pays Guantanamo detainee ‘substantial’ compensation over US torture questions

  • Abu Zubaydah has been held at Guantanamo Bay without charge for 20 years
  • British security services knew he was subjected to ‘enhanced interrogation’ but failed to raise concerns for 4 years

LONDON: A Saudi-born Palestinian being held without trial by the US has received a “substantial” compensation payment from the UK government, the BBC reported.

Abu Zubaydah has been imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba for almost 20 years following his capture in Pakistan in 2002, and was subjected to “enhanced interrogation” techniques by the CIA.

He was accused of being a senior member of Al-Qaeda in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terror attacks on the US. The allegations were later dropped but he remains in detention.

The compensation follows revelations that UK security services submitted questions to the US to be put to Abu Zubaydah by their US counterparts despite knowledge of his mistreatment.

He alleged that MI5 and MI6 had been “complicit” in torture, leading to a legal case and the subsequent compensation.

Dominic Grieve, the UK’s former attorney general, chaired a panel reviewing Abu Zubaydah’s case.

He described the compensation as “very unusual” but said the treatment of Abu Zubaydah had been “plainly” wrong, the BBC reported.

Grieve added that the security services had evidence that the “Americans were behaving in a way that should have given us cause for real concern,” and that “we (UK authorities) should have raised it with the US and, if necessary, closed down co-operation, but we failed to do that for a considerable period of time.”

Abu Zubaydah’s international legal counsel, Prof. Helen Duffy, said: “The compensation is important, it’s significant, but it’s insufficient.”

She added that more needs to be done to secure his release, stating: “These violations of his rights are not historic, they are ongoing.”

Duffy said Abu Zubaydah would continue to fight for his freedom, adding: “I am hopeful that the payment of the substantial sums will enable him to do that and to support himself when he’s in the outside world.”

He is one of 15 people still being held at Guantanamo, many without charge. Following his initial detention, he arrived at the prison camp having been the first person to be taken to a so-called CIA “black site.”

He spent time at six such locations, including in Lithuania and Poland, outside of US legal jurisdiction. 

Internal MI6 messages revealed that the “enhanced interrogation” techniques he was subjected to would have “broken” the resolve of an estimated 98 percent of US special forces members had they been subjected to them.

CIA officers later decided he would be permanently cut off from the outside world, with then-President George W. Bush publicly saying Abu Zubaydah had been “plotting and planning murder.”

However, the US has since withdrawn the allegations and no longer says he was a member of Al-Qaeda.

A report by the US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence said Abu Zubaydah had been waterboarded at least 83 times, was locked in a coffin-like box for extended periods, and had been regularly assaulted. Much of his treatment would be considered torture under UK law.

Despite knowledge of his treatment, it was four years before British security services raised concerns with their American counterparts, and their submission of questions within that period had “created a market” for the torture of detainees, Duffy said.

A 2018 report by the UK Parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee was deeply critical of the behavior of MI5 and MI6 in relation to Abu Zubaydah. 

It also criticized conduct relating to Guantanamo detainee Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, widely regarded as a key architect of the Sept. 11 attacks, warning that the precedent set by Abu Zubaydah’s legal action could be used by Mohammed to bring a separate case against the UK.

MI5 and MI6 failed to comment on Abu Zubaydah’s case. Neither the UK government nor Mohammed’s legal team would comment on a possible case over his treatment.