France, UK propose one-month Ukraine truce; European allies rally around Zelensky amid US row

Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer, center, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, left, and France's President Emmanuel Macron meet during the European leaders' summit to discuss Ukraine at Lancaster House, London, on March 2, 2025. (Pool via AP)
Short Url
Updated 03 March 2025
Follow

France, UK propose one-month Ukraine truce; European allies rally around Zelensky amid US row

  • Urges European countries to raise their defense spending to between 3.0 and 3.5 percent of GDP
  • European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen warned the continent urgently had to rearm to “prepare for the worst”

PARIS: France and Britain are proposing a one-month truce in Ukraine “in the air, at sea” after crisis talks in London, French President Emmanuel Macron said on Sunday.
In an interview with France’s Le Figaro newspaper, he also suggested that European countries should raise their defense spending to between 3.0 and 3.5 percent of GDP to respond to Washington’s shifting priorities.
“For three years, the Russians have spent 10 percent of their GDP on defense,” he told the paper. “So we have to prepare for what’s next.”

Macron announced the proposal as he flew back to France from a summit in London on Sunday, during which European leaders closed ranks in support of Kyiv at a London summit, pledging to spend more on security and assemble a coalition to defend any truce in Ukraine.

Bringing together 18 allies, the talks came just two days after US President Donald Trump berated Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky at a live White House news conference.
And UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said that Britain, France “and others” would work with Ukraine on a plan to stop the fighting, which they would then put to Washington.

 

The London meeting came at a delicate moment for war-battered Ukraine, which faces uncertain backing from Trump and is on the back foot against Russia’s three-year invasion.
And Trump’s row with Zelensky raised fresh questions over the US commitment to Ukraine and NATO.
Starmer said Europe found itself “at a crossroads in history.”
“This is not a moment for more talk — it’s time to act. It’s time to step up and lead and unite around a new plan for a just and enduring peace,” the premier said.
With no guarantee of US involvement, “Europe must do the heavy lifting,” Starmer said. Several countries were ready to help defend any truce, he added — without naming them.

Zelensky was warmly embraced by many of the summit’s attendees, including Starmer, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and NATO chief Mark Rutte.
Outside the UK leader’s home, demonstrators gathered to show their support for Ukraine, some dressed in the country’s blue and yellow national colors.
His reception in London was in stark contrast to his reception at the White House two days earlier.
There, Trump accused Zelensky of not being grateful enough for US aid and not being “ready” for peace with Russia.
Their argument, played out in front of the world’s news cameras, raised fears that Trump wanted to force Kyiv into a peace deal giving Russian President Vladimir Putin what he wants.
Starmer insisted the United States was “not an unreliable ally.” Any deal “must have strong US backing” to succeed, he added.
But after the leaders gathered on Sunday, European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen warned the continent urgently had to rearm to “prepare for the worst.”
And Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk called for the United States and Europe to show Putin “that the West has no intention of capitulating before his blackmail and aggression.”

 

Starmer and Macron have said they are prepared to deploy British and French troops to Ukraine to help preserve any truce.
But Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni — whose hard-right coalition government includes Moscow-friendly politicians — appeared to play down the possibility of Italy contributing soldiers.
“I see this as a solution that risks being very complex and probably less decisive than others,” she said.
Rutte pointed to promises from more European countries to “ramp up defense spending,” while insisting that Washington remained committed to the transatlantic alliance.
In addition to attending the security summit, Zelensky also met King Charles III at his Sandringham estate.

Friday’s row in Washington marked a change from Zelensky’s previous treatment there, where he was hailed as a Churchillian figure by the previous US administration.
Trump and his Vice President JD Vance angrily accused Zelensky of not being “thankful” and refusing to accept their proposed truce terms.
On Sunday, top Washington Republicans doubled down on their criticism of the Ukrainian leader, suggesting he may have to step down, underscoring Trump’s stunning shift in approach to the war with Russia.
“We need a leader that can deal with us, eventually deal with the Russians, and end this war,” Mike Waltz, Trump’s national security adviser told CNN.
Republican Mike Johnson, speaker of the House of Representatives, said: “Either he needs to come to his senses and come back to the table in gratitude, or someone else needs to lead the country.”
Trump has cast himself as a mediator between Putin and Zelensky, sidelining Kyiv and Europe while pursuing rapprochement with Putin.
Zelensky, though he did not apologize after the White House clash, indicated that he was still open to signing a deal on Ukraine’s mineral wealth — coveted by Trump.
The US president on Sunday shared a reposting on his Truth Social platform arguing that the mineral agreement itself would give Ukraine the security it was seeking and that “in the end, Zelensky will have no choice but to concede.”
Moscow meanwhile branded the Ukrainian leader’s Washington trip a “complete failure” and said that Trump’s changed stance “aligns” with its vision.
 

 


Americans’ views on Israel at near-historic low while support for Palestinian state hits a high: Gallup

Updated 56 min 12 sec ago
Follow

Americans’ views on Israel at near-historic low while support for Palestinian state hits a high: Gallup

  • Latest poll results reveal views on Israel are among the most negative Gallup has ever measured, while views on Palestinian territories are the most positive on record
  • More Americans now sympathize more with Palestinians than Israelis, a reversal of the past 25 years in which Israel held large, double-digit leads in terms of US sympathy

NEW YORK CITY: The views of Americans on Israel have fallen close to their lowest levels on record, while support for the creation of an independent Palestinian state has risen to one of its highest levels in more than two decades, according to the latest research from Gallup.

The company’s annual update on US attitudes toward the Middle East reveals a significant shift in public opinion over the past year. For the past 25 years, Israel has held large, double-digit leads in terms of US sympathy, but this year more Americans said they sympathized with the Palestinians.

In the Gallup poll of 1,001 adults, carried out by ReconMR between Feb. 2 and 16, 41 percent said they sympathized more with the Palestinians, compared with 36 percent who sympathized more with the Israelis.

Though the five-percentage-point difference is not statistically significant, it contrasts sharply with the results of a Gallup poll a year ago, in which more people (46 percent) were sympathetic to the Israelis than the Palestinians (33 percent).

In fact, for more than two decades Israelis have garnered much greater sympathy than Palestinians; for most of the time between 2001 and 2025, the difference was in the large double digits.

However, the gap started to shrink in 2019, long before before the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks by Hamas and the subsequent war in Gaza. This gradual shift in attitudes over the past seven years has now reached the point where Israel no longer holds a clear advantage in terms of American sympathy.

The shift has largely been driven by political independents, whose sympathies now favor Palestinians over Israelis by a margin of 41 percent to 30 percent. Previously, independents consistently leaned toward Israelis, including 42 percent last year compared with 34 for Palestinians.

Democrats have remained relatively consistent in their sympathies over the past year, after flipping strongly toward Palestinians in 2025 following an initial tilt in 2023. In the latest poll, 65 percent said they sympathized more with Palestinians, compared with 17 percent for Israelis.

Republicans continued to favor Israelis by a similarly wide margin: 70 percent sympathize more with Israelis, compared with 13 percent for Palestinians.

Still, sympathy for Israelis among Republicans has declined by 10 percentage points since 2024, hitting its lowest level since 2004.

Generational differences in attitudes are also pronounced. Among Americans between the ages of 18 and 34, 53 percent said they sympathized more with Palestinians. It was the first time a majority in this age group had taken that position. Only 23 percent sympathized more with Israelis, a record low.

Among those in the 35-54 age range, 46 percent sympathized more with the Palestinians, compared with 28 percent for Israelis, marking a reversal from 12 months ago when 45 percent sympathized more with Israelis and 33 percent with Palestinians.

Americans age 55 and older remain more sympathetic to Israelis: 49 percent compared with 31 percent for Palestinians. However, this year was the first since 2005 in which less than half of older Americans sympathized more with Israelis.

Beyond the question of sympathies, the poll also found that overall favorability ratings of Israel and the Palestinian territories had also shifted.

Americans rated Israel much more favorably than the Occupied Palestinian Territories in Gallup surveys between 2000 to 2024. The latest poll found that views on Israel were among the least positive Gallup has measured. Meanwhile, views on the Palestinian territories, though still net negative overall, were the most positive on record.

Support among Americans for a two-state solution also reached one of the highest levels in the history of tracking by Gallup: 57 percent of respondents said they favored the establishment of an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel, 28 percent opposed it and 15 percent had no opinion.

The support was strongest among Democrats, at 77 percent, and 57 percent of independents also backed a two-state solution, levels that have been generally consistent since 2023.

Republican support has fluctuated sharply in recent years. It fell from 43 percent before the Oct. 7 attacks in 2023 to 26 percent in the immediate aftermath, the largest single-year drop recorded among any party group. Support rebounded to 41 percent last year, before declining again to 33 percent in the latest survey.

With the exception of 2024, the current 44 percentage point gap between Democrats and Republicans is the widest Gallup has recorded on the issue.

Nevertheless, Americans remain more supportive of a two-state solution than Israelis or Palestinians themselves: in 2025, only 27 percent of Israelis and 33 percent of Palestinians living in the West Bank and East Jerusalem said they supported such a proposal.