White House says Trump tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China will come Saturday

President Donald Trump holds a signed executive order on deregulation in the Oval Office of the White House, Jan. 31, 2025, in Washington. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 01 February 2025
Follow

White House says Trump tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China will come Saturday

  • “Starting tomorrow, those tariffs will be in place,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Friday
  • The tariffs carry both political and economic risks for Trump

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump will put in place 25 percent tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico and 10 percent tariffs on goods from China effective on Saturday, the White House said, but it provided no word on whether there would be any exemptions to the measures that could result in swift price increases to US consumers.
Trump had been threatening the tariffs to ensure greater cooperation from the countries on stopping illegal immigration and the smuggling of chemicals used for fentanyl, but he has also pledged to use tariffs to boost domestic manufacturing and raise revenues for the federal government.
“Starting tomorrow, those tariffs will be in place,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Friday. “These are promises made and promises kept by the president.”
The tariffs carry both political and economic risks for Trump, who is just two weeks into his second term. Many voters backed the Republican on the promise that he could tamp down inflation, but the possibility of tariffs could trigger higher prices and potentially disrupt the energy, auto, lumber and agricultural sectors.
Trump had said he was weighing issuing an exemption for Canadian and Mexican oil imports, but Leavitt said she had no information to share on the president’s decision on any potential carveouts.
The United States imported almost 4.6 million barrels of oil daily from Canada in October and 563,000 barrels from Mexico, according to the Energy Information Administration. US daily production during that month averaged nearly 13.5 million barrels a day.
Trump has previously stated a 10 percent tariff on Chinese imports would be on top of other import taxes charged on products from the country.
Shortly after Leavitt spoke, the S&P 500 stock index sold off and largely erased its gains on the day.
“We should expect all three countries to retaliate,’’ said Wendy Cutler, a former US trade negotiator. China responded aggressively to tariffs Trump imposed on Chinese goods during his first term, targeting the president’s supporters in rural America with retaliatory taxes on US farm exports.
Both Canada and Mexico have said they’ve prepared the option of retaliatory tariffs to be used if necessary, which in turn could trigger a wider trade conflict that economic analyzes say could hurt growth and further accelerate inflation.
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Friday that Canada is ready is a respond if Trump goes ahead with the tariffs, but he did not give details.
“We’re ready with a response, a purposeful, forceful but reasonable, immediate response,” he said. “It’s not what we want, but if he moves forward, we will also act.”
Trudeau said tariffs would have “disastrous consequences” for the U.S, putting American jobs at risk and causing prices to rise. Trudeau reiterated that less than 1 percent of the fentanyl and illegal crossings into the US come from Canada.
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum said Friday that Mexico has maintained a dialogue with Trump’s team since before he returned to the White House, but she emphasized that Mexico has a “Plan A, Plan B, Plan C for what the United States government decides.”
“Now it is very important that the Mexican people know that we are always going to defend the dignity of our people, we are always going to defend the respect of our sovereignty and a dialogue between equals, as we have always said, without subordination,” Sheinbaum said.
Liu Pengyu, spokesman for the Chinese embassy in Washington, said the two countries should resolve their differences through dialogue and consultation. “There is no winner in a trade war or tariff war, which serves the interests of neither side nor the world,” Liu said in a statement. “Despite the differences, our two countries share huge common interests and space for cooperation.”
A study this month by Warwick McKibbin and Marcus Noland of the Peterson Institute for International Economics concluded that the 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico and 10 percent tariffs on China “would damage all the economies involved, including the US’’
“For Mexico,’’ the study said, “a 25 percent tariff would be catastrophic. Moreover, the economic decline caused by the tariff could increase the incentives for Mexican immigrants to cross the border illegally into the US — directly contradicting another Trump administration priority.’’
Cutler, now vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute, said the extent of the economic damage will depend on how long the tariffs are in effect.
If it’s just a few days, “that’s one thing. If they are in place for weeks onto months, we’re going to see supply chain disruptions, higher costs for US manufacturers, leading to higher prices for US consumers,’’ she said. “It could have macroeconomic impacts. It could affect the stock market. Then internationally it could lead to more tension with our trading partners and make it harder for us to work with them.”


Afghan clerics ban use of nation’s territory for attacks, declare national defense obligatory

Updated 9 sec ago
Follow

Afghan clerics ban use of nation’s territory for attacks, declare national defense obligatory

  • Scholars’ gathering attended by Taliban leaders, Supreme Judge Sheikh Abdul Hakim Haqqani
  • Decree says citizens must not allow Afghan soil ‘to be used against any other country’

KABUL: Afghan scholars have issued a fatwa, or religious decree, banning the use of Afghan soil for attacks on other countries and declaring national defense a sacred religious duty, less than a week after deadly border clashes erupted again between Afghanistan and Pakistan following a fragile ceasefire.

The decree was issued on Wednesday following a grand assembly in Kabul that was attended by around a thousand clerics, religious leaders and officials.

They held discussions in the presence of several Taliban leaders, including Supreme Judge Sheikh Abdul Hakim Haqqani, Minister of Virtue and Prevention of Vice Khalid Hanafi, and Minister of Higher Education Sheikh Neda Mohammad Nadeem.

In a five-article decree seen by Arab News, the scholars said that defending national interests is “necessary and obligatory” for every Muslim.

“Whenever anyone from outside Afghanistan attempts to invade or harm the country, defense becomes a religious obligation. Muslims, without hesitation, must consider defending the system, the land, and their own values as an obligation. This defense is called ‘sacred jihad,’” one article reads.

It also said the people of Afghanistan must “not allow anyone to use the Afghan soil for destructive purposes,” and that “no one has the right to give foreign countries permission to operate or interfere” in the country under any name.

“The Islamic Emirate must prevent such actions and take necessary measures to stop those attempting it,” another article reads.

The Kabul gathering was aimed at uniting religious opinion behind the Taliban’s stance, said one Taliban official, who spoke with Arab News on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the media.

“The message is clear. If we are attacked, we must respond — this is now an obligation,” another Taliban official, who was also not authorized to speak to the media, told Arab News.

Deadly border clashes broke out last week between Afghan and Pakistani forces, marking violations of a ceasefire that was in place since October.

After the ceasefire agreement, subsequent talks for a long-term truce have so far yielded little progress. The latest deadly exchange of fire comes amid reports of back-channel negotiations between Afghan and Pakistani officials, which neither governments have openly confirmed.

Wednesday’s fatwa was seen by some as a calibrated signal to Pakistan, which has repeatedly accused Afghanistan’s Taliban government of tolerating cross-border militancy.

“The above resolution reflects the collective wisdom of the Afghan Ulema and is clearly intended to convey a message to Pakistan regarding reconciliation between the two Muslim countries,” Asif Durrani, Pakistan’s former special envoy to Afghanistan, wrote on X.

“The government of Pakistan should welcome the resolution and offer the resumption of dialogue with the Taliban regime.”

Relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan have been deteriorating since the Taliban took control of Afghanistan in 2021, with clashes intensifying along the Durand Line — their 2,640-km border.

Dozens of people died during the violence in October, making it the deadliest confrontation in years between the neighbors.

Islamabad accuses the Afghan Taliban of sheltering fighters from the banned Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan and allowing them to stage cross-border attacks — a charge Afghanistan denies, saying it does not allow its territory to be used against other countries.

Wasi Baheer, an Afghan political analyst, said the decree did not signify a new move from the Taliban government.

“This is not big news for either country. The leadership of the Taliban had announced this earlier — this is a repeated decree calling jihad abroad impermissible,” he told Arab News.

“The TTP problem is not new for Pakistan,” Baheer said. “I think Kabul cannot do more to help Pakistan. The fatwa will not have a huge effect on things, as the Afghan Taliban are not involved, and the TTP is too strong now to listen.”