ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s Religious Affairs Minister Chaudhry Salik Hussain on Monday unveiled the Hajj Policy 2025, announcing an instalment plan for pilgrims to pay Hajj fees.
Hajj is one of five pillars of Islam, annually undertaken by millions of Muslims. Pakistan has one of the largest Hajj quotas provided by Saudi Arabia to any Muslim country amid immense demand for the pilgrimage, with many citizens waiting for years for an opportunity to participate.
Next year’s Hajj under the government scheme is expected to range between Rs1,075,000 to Rs1,175,000, while an additional cost for the sacrifice will be Rs55,000, according to the religious affairs minister.
The first installment of Hajj dues, amounting to Rs200,000, must be deposited along with the Hajj application under the government scheme, while the second installment of Rs400,000 must be deposited within ten days of the balloting. The remaining amount must be deposited by February 10 next year.
“If you submit Rs200,000 at the time of the application and your name comes (in the lucky draw) then you will submit Rs400,000 before the rest of the amount between Feb. 1-10,” Hussain said at a press conference.
The Pakistani government approved the new Hajj policy earlier this month, having a quota of 179,210 pilgrims who would be facilitated under the government scheme and through private tour operators.
Hussain said the move would facilitate people who could not make large payments at once, clarifying that Rs50,000 would be deducted if the first instalment is withdrawn whereas Rs200,000 would be deducted if the third instalment was not submitted.
Preference would be given to those going for the pilgrimage for the first time, according to the minister. As per the new policy, children under the age of 12 will not be allowed to travel for Hajj.
“The traditional long package for the official Hajj scheme will cover 38 to 42 days and the short package will cover 20 to 25 days,” Hussain added.
Pakistan allows Hajj fee payments in installments in new policy
https://arab.news/5my35
Pakistan allows Hajj fee payments in installments in new policy
- Pakistan will send 179,210 pilgrims under government scheme and through private operators
- The government will prioritize first-time pilgrims in the official balloting process, minister says
Pakistan opposition continues sit-in outside parliament over ex-PM Khan’s eye treatment
- Opposition leader says the protest will continue until Imran Khan, currently at Adiala prison, is admitted to Shifa Hospital
- The government says Khan’s medical report will be compiled again, promising no negligence in the matter under judicial oversight
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s opposition alliance is continuing its sit-in outside the Parliament House in Islamabad for the second day on Saturday, seeking shifting of jailed former prime minister Imran Khan to a private hospital for treatment of his worsening eye condition.
The protest follows a rare prison visit earlier this week by Barrister Salman Safdar, appointed as amicus curiae by the Supreme Court to assess Khan’s health and living conditions at Rawalpindi’s Adiala jail. In his report, Safdar highlighted “seriousness” of Khan’s ocular condition and recommended an independent examination.
On Friday evening, opposition members gathered outside the parliament building in Islamabad to stage a sit-in, with the police locking its gates and cordoning off surrounding roads to prevent protesters from gathering in front of the building, witnesses and opposition leaders said.
Mehmood Khan Achakzai, the head of the Tehreek-e-Tahafuz-e-Ayeen-e-Pakistan opposition alliance, criticized the authorities for the measures to prevent opposition members from reaching the sit-in venue in Islamabad.
“We are not the ones who make threats, but if you continue with this attitude, after two or three days every roundabout in Pakistan will be closed,” Achakzai said on X late Friday. “Then we will not even be able to handle the people.”
In an earlier post on X, the alliance said its leadership would continue the sit-in “until Imran Khan is admitted to Al-Shifa Hospital.”
“We have staged a sit-in for the earliest medical check-up of Imran Khan, which would take just ten minutes,” Achakzai told reporters on Friday evening. “If it is conducted, we will end our protest.”
According to a Feb. 6 medical report from the Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS) cited in Safdar’s filing, Khan was diagnosed with “right central retinal vein occlusion” after reporting reduced vision in his right eye. He underwent an intravitreal injection at PIMS and was discharged with follow-up advice.
In his interaction with Safdar, Khan said he had suffered “rapid and substantial loss of vision over the preceding three months” and claimed his complaints had not been addressed promptly in custody. He further said he had been left with “only 15 percent vision in his right eye.”
Safdar’s report noted that the 73-year-old former premier appeared “visibly perturbed and deeply distressed” over the loss of vision, though it also recorded that he expressed satisfaction with his safety, basic amenities and food provisions in prison.
Responding to the controversy, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Tariq Fazal Chaudhry rejected PTI’s claims that Khan had been suffering from an eye issue since October last year, noting that the ex-premier was visited by his sister on Dec. 2 but she did not mention the medical issue.
“Medical report will be compiled again, the chief justice of the Supreme Court is himself monitoring this case,” he said. “Wherever it will be requested, Imran Khan’s eye will be examined at.”
Chaudhry vowed there would be no negligence.
Khan has been in custody since August 2023 in connection with multiple cases that he and his party describe as politically motivated. The government denies the allegation.
Concerns over his health resurfaced after authorities confirmed he had briefly been taken from prison to a hospital in Islamabad for an eye procedure. While the government said his condition was stable, Khan’s family and PTI leaders alleged they were not informed in advance and that he was being denied timely and independent medical access.
