Book Review: ‘A Little Life’

Short Url
Updated 27 October 2024
Follow

Book Review: ‘A Little Life’

  • Spanning more than 700 pages, the novel is an emotionally intense journey that delves deep into the lives of four college friends as they navigate adulthood in New York City

Hanya Yanagihara’s “A Little Life,” originally published in 2015, is a monumental and devastating exploration of trauma, friendship and the complexities of human resilience. 

Spanning more than 700 pages, the novel is an emotionally intense journey that delves deep into the lives of four college friends as they navigate adulthood in New York City. 

At its core, however, the novel revolves around Jude St. Francis, a character whose harrowing past and enduring pain form the emotional backbone of the story.

The power of “A Little Life” lies in its unflinching portrayal of suffering. Yanagihara masterfully crafts a narrative that is both intimate and unrelenting, capturing the profound impact of Jude’s traumatic experiences. His past, gradually revealed through the novel, casts a long shadow over his present, affecting not only his relationship with himself but also with those who care for him. 

The depiction of trauma is raw and visceral, leaving a lasting impression on the reader. Yanagihara does not spare the reader from the depths of Jude’s anguish, making the novel a challenging but profoundly moving experience.

While the novel is heavy with themes of pain and loss, it also explores the transformative power of friendship. The bond between Jude and his friends — Willem, Malcolm and JB — offers moments of tenderness and connection that provide respite from the overwhelming darkness. Yanagihara’s portrayal of these relationships is one of the novel’s strengths, offering a nuanced look at love, loyalty and the ways in which friends become chosen family. 

The deep emotional ties between the characters elevate “A Little Life” beyond a mere tale of suffering, making it a meditation on the capacity for human connection to heal, even when the scars run deep.

Yanagihara’s prose is haunting and beautiful, drawing the reader into the lives of the characters with an intensity that is hard to resist. The novel’s length allows for a thorough and immersive exploration of the characters’ inner worlds, making their joys and sorrows feel deeply personal. 

Yet, “A Little Life” is not without its challenges. Its relentless focus on Jude’s trauma can be overwhelming, and the novel’s unremitting sadness may prove too intense for some readers. However, for those willing to confront its emotional weight, the novel offers a deeply affecting and unforgettable experience.

In “A Little Life,” Yanagihara examines the extremes of human experience — both the agonizing depths of despair and the redemptive potential of love. It is a novel that demands patience and emotional endurance but rewards readers with a story of profound emotional depth. 

Although it may not be suitable for everyone, “A Little Life” is a masterpiece of modern literature, providing an unflinching look at pain, survival and the bonds that sustain us.


What We Are Reading Today: ‘Collaborating with the Enemy’

Photo/Supplied
Updated 19 December 2025
Follow

What We Are Reading Today: ‘Collaborating with the Enemy’

  • This skill is certainly necessary to acquire and maintain in our increasingly globalized world

The title of the 2017 book “Collaborating with the Enemy: How to Work with People You Don’t Agree with or Like or Trust,” by Adam Kahane, is sure to catch your curiosity.

Printed by the independent, mission-driven publishing company Berrett-Koehler, the book delivers on delving into the topic.

Kahane, a director of Reos Partners — which describes itself as “an international social enterprise that helps people move forward together on their most important and intractable issues” — argues that traditional collaboration, which relies on harmony, consensus and a clear, shared plan, is often impossible to achieve in complex, polarized situations.

Instead, he proposes something called “stretch collaboration,” a framework for working with people you may not agree with, like, or even trust. 

This skill is certainly necessary to acquire and maintain in our increasingly globalized world.

Some of the practical techniques and strategies mentioned can arguably be applied beyond the workplace: in fractured families or friendships, for example.

“The problem with enemyfying is not that we never have enemies: we often face people and situations that present us with difficulties and dangers,” Kahane writes.

“Moreover, any effort we make to effect change in the world will create discomfort, resistance, and opposition. The real problem with enemyfying is that it distracts and unbalances us. We cannot avoid others whom we find challenging, so we need to focus simply on deciding, given these challenges, what we ourselves will do next.”

The book boasts a foreword by Peter Block, bestselling author of “Community and Stewardship,” who writes: “The book is really an annotation on the title. The title asks me to collaborate with people I don’t agree with. Not so difficult. But then the stakes are raised, and I am asked to collaborate with people I don’t like. This too is manageable, even common in most workplaces.

“The final ask, though, is tougher: collaborate with people I don’t trust; even people I consider enemies. To make these acts doable is the promise of the book.”

And, in a way, it does. But Kahane seems to also use this book to pat himself on the back. In parts it reads like an expanded LinkedIn testimonial to his own resume.