PARIS: Manizha Talash, the Afghan breakdancer from the refugee team who was disqualified at the Paris Olympics for displaying the words “Free Afghan Women” on her cape in her routine last month, said she planned her action for four months and would do it again.
Talash, who lives in Spain, wore a light blue cape with the phrase written on it in large white letters in her pre-qualifier loss to India Sardjoe of Netherlands at Place de la Concorde, which she said was inspired by the ‘Hunger Games’ movie.
Political slogans and statement are banned on the field of play and on podiums at the Olympics and breaking’s governing body later said the 21-year-old had been disqualified.
“As long as I can remember, I grew up with the sound of the bombs around me every day, with my loved ones, some of whom I lost in the bombings,” Talash, who was in Paris after a local association for Afghan women raised funds to fly her from Spain, told Reuters at the Paralympic Games, where fellow Afghan Zakia Khudadadi clinched a bronze medal in taekwondo — a first for a para athlete from a refugee team at an Olympics.
“I am like a bomb because I grew with bombs around me.
“I used the first competition, the first dance performance I was able to do, to act directly and highlight the action I wanted to take. If I had to do it again I would do the same.”
The Taliban’s restrictions on women and freedom of expression have drawn sharp criticism from rights groups and many foreign governments since the former insurgents resumed control of Afghanistan in 2021.
WOMEN’S CAUSE
Talash, who stayed for a year in Pakistan hoping to return to her home country before moving to Spain after the Taliban took Kabul three years ago, said Afghan women were “in a cage” and it was her duty to “resist.”
“For four months I thought about what I could do so that the cause of Afghan women would he heard,” she said.
“But I want to be clear that this was not a political message, it was a message I wanted to send to the world.
“I’m not just a sports person, I’m a hip hop person who wants to be able to think and dress differently.
“My message was not about (wearing) the hijab (or not), it was about freedom of movement and education (for women in Afghanistan),” Talash added in a press conference as tears rolled down her cheeks.
After drying her eyes, two pearly jewels looking like tears remained under them.
“It’s a message and in the same way it’s the idea that a woman’s tears are important and that we have to be very careful not to have women shed tears,” she said.
Western capitals, led by Washington, have said the path to formal recognition of the Taliban is largely stalled until they reverse course on women’s rights and open high schools to girls.
“I’m also fighting for this generation, but also the future generations who will end up being illiterate,” Talash said.
“The burqa (cape) I wore at the Olympics was a symbol — like wings for Afghan women to take flight and break free.”
Refugee breakdancer stands by ‘Free Afghan Women’ message at Paris Olympics 2024
https://arab.news/zwm69
Refugee breakdancer stands by ‘Free Afghan Women’ message at Paris Olympics 2024
- Political slogans and statements are banned on the field of play and on podiums at the Olympics
- Taliban’s restrictions on women have drawn sharp criticism from rights groups, foreign governments
Justice Department faces hurdle in seeking case against Comey as judge finds constitutional problems
Justice Department faces hurdle in seeking case against Comey as judge finds constitutional problems
WASHINGTON: The Justice Department violated the constitutional rights of a close friend of James Comey and must return to him computer files that prosecutors had hoped to use for a potential criminal case against the former FBI director, a federal judge said Friday.
The ruling from US District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly represents not only a stern rebuke of the conduct of Justice Department prosecutors but also imposes a dramatic hurdle to government efforts to seek a new indictment against Comey after an initial one was dismissed last month.
The order concerns computer files and communications that investigators obtained years earlier from Daniel Richman, a Comey friend and Columbia University law professor, as part of a media leak investigation that concluded without charges. The Justice Department continued to hold onto those files and conducted searches of them this fall, without a new warrant, as they prepared a case charging Comey with lying to Congress five years ago.
Richman alleged that the Justice Department violated his Fourth Amendment rights by retaining his records and by conducting new warrantless searches of the files, prompting Kollar-Kotelly to issue an order last week temporarily barring prosecutors from accessing the files as part of its investigation.
The Justice Department said the request for the return of the records was merely an attempt to impede a new prosecution of Comey, but the judge again sided with Richman in a 46-page order Friday that directed the Justice Department to give him back his files.
“When the Government violates the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures by sweeping up a broad swath of a person’s electronic files, retaining those files long after the relevant investigation has ended, and later sifting through those files without a warrant to obtain evidence against someone else, what remedy is available to the victim of the Government’s unlawful intrusion?” the judge wrote.
One answer, she said, is to require the government to return the property to the rightful owner.
The judge did, however, permit the Justice Department to file an electronic copy of Richman’s records under seal with the Eastern District of Virginia, where the Comey investigation has been based, and suggested prosecutors could try to access it later with a lawful search warrant.
The Justice Department alleges that Comey used Richman to share information with the news media about his decision-making during the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server. Prosecutors charged the former FBI director in September with lying to Congress by denying that he had authorized an associate to serve as an anonymous source for the media.
That indictment was dismissed last month after a federal judge in Virginia ruled that the prosecutor who brought the case, Lindsey Halligan, was unlawfully appointed by the Trump administration. But the ruling left open the possibility that the government could try again to seek charges against Comey, a longtime foe of President Donald Trump. Comey has pleaded not guilty, denied having made a false statement and accused the Justice Department of a vindictive prosecution.
The Comey saga has a long history.
In June 2017, one month after Comey was fired as FBI director, he testified that he had given Richman a copy of a memo he had written documenting a conversation he had with Trump and had authorized him to share the contents of the memo with a reporter.
After that testimony, Richman permitted the FBI to create an image, or complete electronic copy, of all files on his computer and a hard drive attached to that computer. He authorized the FBI to conduct a search for limited purposes, the judge noted.
Then, in 2019 and 2020, the FBI and Justice Department obtained search warrants to obtain Richman’s email accounts and computer files as part of a media leak investigation that concluded in 2021 without charges. Those warrants were limited in scope, but Richman has alleged that the government collected more information than the warrants allowed, including personal medial information and sensitive correspondence.
In addition, Richman said the Justice Department violated his rights by searching his files in September, without a new warrant, as part of an entirely separate investigation.
“The Court further concludes that the Government’s retention of Petitioner Richman’s files amounts to an ongoing unreasonable seizure,” Kollar-Kotelly wrote. “Therefore, the Court agrees with Petitioner Richman that the Government has violated his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures.”
