What We Are Reading Today: ‘The Yellow Wallpaper’

Photo/Supplied
Short Url
Updated 27 August 2024
Follow

What We Are Reading Today: ‘The Yellow Wallpaper’

Author: Charlotte Perkins Gilman

“The Yellow Wallpaper” is a short story written by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, published in 1892 and often included in Gilman’s collected works.

The story is a classic piece of feminist literature that explores themes of mental illness, gender roles, and the oppression of women in the late 19th century.

The story is told through the first-person narrative of a woman suffering from what was then called “nervous depression.”

She is confined to a room with ugly yellow wallpaper by her husband, who believes rest is the best cure for her condition.

The narrator becomes obsessed with the wallpaper, which she sees as a representation of her own imprisonment and suppression.

The story culminates in the narrator’s mental breakdown as she becomes convinced that a woman is trapped behind the wallpaper.

“The Yellow Wallpaper” was groundbreaking in its frank depiction of a woman’s descent into mental illness.

Gilman used the story to criticize the common medical belief of the time that women’s mental issues were rooted in their biology and reproductive functions.

The story remains an important work that highlights how patriarchal structures and gender norms can contribute to women’s mental anguish.

It is widely regarded as an important work that reflects the historical context of women’s rights and gender roles in the late 19th century.

From women’s limited access to education and professional opportunities to domestic confinement and lack of autonomy, Gilman provides a searing critique of social, medical, and gender norms.
 

 


What We Are Reading Today: ‘Collaborating with the Enemy’

Photo/Supplied
Updated 19 December 2025
Follow

What We Are Reading Today: ‘Collaborating with the Enemy’

  • This skill is certainly necessary to acquire and maintain in our increasingly globalized world

The title of the 2017 book “Collaborating with the Enemy: How to Work with People You Don’t Agree with or Like or Trust,” by Adam Kahane, is sure to catch your curiosity.

Printed by the independent, mission-driven publishing company Berrett-Koehler, the book delivers on delving into the topic.

Kahane, a director of Reos Partners — which describes itself as “an international social enterprise that helps people move forward together on their most important and intractable issues” — argues that traditional collaboration, which relies on harmony, consensus and a clear, shared plan, is often impossible to achieve in complex, polarized situations.

Instead, he proposes something called “stretch collaboration,” a framework for working with people you may not agree with, like, or even trust. 

This skill is certainly necessary to acquire and maintain in our increasingly globalized world.

Some of the practical techniques and strategies mentioned can arguably be applied beyond the workplace: in fractured families or friendships, for example.

“The problem with enemyfying is not that we never have enemies: we often face people and situations that present us with difficulties and dangers,” Kahane writes.

“Moreover, any effort we make to effect change in the world will create discomfort, resistance, and opposition. The real problem with enemyfying is that it distracts and unbalances us. We cannot avoid others whom we find challenging, so we need to focus simply on deciding, given these challenges, what we ourselves will do next.”

The book boasts a foreword by Peter Block, bestselling author of “Community and Stewardship,” who writes: “The book is really an annotation on the title. The title asks me to collaborate with people I don’t agree with. Not so difficult. But then the stakes are raised, and I am asked to collaborate with people I don’t like. This too is manageable, even common in most workplaces.

“The final ask, though, is tougher: collaborate with people I don’t trust; even people I consider enemies. To make these acts doable is the promise of the book.”

And, in a way, it does. But Kahane seems to also use this book to pat himself on the back. In parts it reads like an expanded LinkedIn testimonial to his own resume.