Markella Kavenagh shows off Elie Saab look at London ‘LOTR’ premiere

Markella Kavenagh’s two-tone, floor-length ballgown hailed from the fashion house’s Fall/Winter 2024 collection. (Getty Images)
Short Url
Updated 24 August 2024
Follow

Markella Kavenagh shows off Elie Saab look at London ‘LOTR’ premiere

DUBAI: Australian actress Markella Kavenagh showed off a gown by Lebanese luxury label Elie Saab at the world premiere of “The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power” Season Two in London — just days after another star opted for Elie Saab on the red carpet.

Kavenagh’s two-tone, floor-length ballgown hailed from the fashion house’s Fall/Winter 2024 collection.

Kavenagh plays the harfoot Nori Brandyfoot in both seasons of the show, which streams on Amazon Prime Video. Her first film break came with 2019’s “True History of The Kelly Gang,” and she has also taken on roles in Australian TV shows like “Romper Stomper,” “Picnic at Hanging Rock,” and “The Cry.”

The actress previously told Collider that costumes and makeup played a major role in helping her get into character.

“I think for me, it’s the costume and the makeup. I think that’s when I fully feel like I am the character because beforehand, the preparation that you do or the research that you do or the backstory that you do, that’s all well and good, but then to actually have the other layers come together. It also just brings you closer to the heads of department and to the crew because they’ve all had a hand in making that,” she said.

Meanwhile, British actress Nathalie Emmanuel attended the Los Angeles Premiere of Peacock's “The Killer” earlier in August wearing a look from Elie Saab’s Haute Couture Autumn/Winter 2023 collection.

The look featured a black-on-black bodice and skirt combination with a thigh-high slit for extra drama.

Directed by John Woo, the remake of the 1989 classic sees an assassin land in hot water after sparing the life of a young woman.  Emmanuel, Omar Sy and Sam Worthington star in the action flick.

Something Woo wanted to do this time around was explore the assassin, played by Emmanuel, as a human being.

“She has a lot of emotions,” Emmanuel told Forbes. “With many of the classic action stereotypes, everyone's very steely, and they have this sternness, and he was like, 'I want vulnerability and that conflict in her to be really evident.' I loved that he wanted to approach it in that way.”


Review: Netflix’s ‘The New Yorker at 100’

Updated 27 sec ago
Follow

Review: Netflix’s ‘The New Yorker at 100’

  • Directed by Marshall Curry, the documentary opened the doors to the publication’s meticulous world, offering viewers a rare look inside the issues within the magazine’s issues

Out this month, Netflix’s “The New Yorker at 100” documentary marks the centennial of the weekly that has brought forth arguably some of the most compelling long-form journalism in my lifetime.

As a ferocious reader with an insatiable appetite for print, I vividly recall picking-up a copy of The New Yorker in Saudi Arabia after school as a teen, determined to read it cover-to-cover — only to find myself mentally, intellectually and physically exhausted after deciphering a single lyrical and Herculean-sized long-form piece.

Reading The New Yorker still makes one both feel smarter — and perhaps not smart enough — at the very same time. Just like the documentary.

Much like Vogue’s 2009 documentary, “The September Issue,” which followed (now retired) editor-in-chief Anna Wintour as she prepared for the September 2007 issue; this documentary largely centered on the making of the Feb. 17 & 24, 2025 multi-cover edition.

A quintessentially New York staple that readers either love or loathe — or both — the magazine has long been seen as a highbrow publication for the “elite.”

But The New Yorker is in on the joke. It never did take itself too seriously.

Directed by Marshall Curry, the documentary opened the doors to the publication’s meticulous world, offering viewers a rare look inside the issues within the magazine’s issues.

Narrated by actress Julianne Moore, it included sit-down interviews with famous figures, largely offering gushing testimonials.

It, of course, included many cameos from pop culture references such as from “Seinfeld,” “The Good Place” and others.

It also mentioned New Yorker’s famed late writers Anthony Bourdain and Truman Capote, and Ronan Farrow.

As a journalist myself, I enjoyed the behind-the-scenes peeks into staff meetings and editing discussions, including the line-by-line fact-checking process.

While lovingly headquartered in New York — and now based at One World Trade Center after decades in the heart of Times Square — the magazine has long published dispatches from elsewhere in the country and around the world.

I wish there had been more airtime dedicated to Jeanette “Jane” Cole Grant, who co-founded the magazine with her husband-at-the-time, Harold Ross, during the Roaring Twenties.

Ironically, neither founder hailed from New York — Grant arrived from Missouri at 16 to pursue singing before becoming a journalist on staff at The New York Times — and Ross came from a Colorado mining town.

Perhaps more bizarrely, Ross, who served as the first editor-in-chief of The New Yorker — known today for its intricate reporting and 11 Pulitzer Prizes — had dropped out of school at 13. He served as lead editor for 26 years until his death, guided by instinct and surrounded by talented writers he hired.

As the Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and the magazine’s fifth editor-in-chief, David Remnick has held the role since 1998. “It is a place that publishes a 15,000-word profile of a musician one week, a 9,000-word account from Southern Lebanon, with gag cartoons interspersed in them,” he said in one scene.

It also offered a glimpse of the leadership of his predecessor, the vivacious and provocative Tina Brown, who served as editor-in-chief for six years starting in 1992.

No woman has held the top editor position before or since her tenure.

Some of the most compelling moments in the documentary, for me, showed journalists scribbling in reporter notebooks in darkened movie theaters, rocking-out in dingy punk shows, and reporting from political rallies while life unfolded around them.

These journalists were not sitting in diners, merely chasing the money or seated in corner offices; they were on the ground, focused on accuracy and texture, intent on portraying what it meant to be a New Yorker who cared about the world, both beyond the city’s borders and within them.

While Arab bylines remain limited, the insights from current marginalized writers and editors showed how the magazine has been trying to diversify and include more contributors of color. They are still working on it.

A century in, this documentary feels like an issue of The New Yorker — except perhaps easier to complete.