Pakistani jirga rejects new anti-terrorism operation, calls for peace in tribal areas

Pakistani paramilitary forces patrol on July 9, 2011 as displaced families flee the area during the "Koh-e Safid" (White Mountain) military operation against Taliban militants in central part of Kurram Agency, Pakistan's tribal belt bordering Afghanistan. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 26 June 2024
Follow

Pakistani jirga rejects new anti-terrorism operation, calls for peace in tribal areas

  • Opposition party Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf organizes meeting of tribal elders, political parties and civil society members in Peshawar
  • Pakistan’s government last week announced it would launch a new anti-terrorism operation to root out militancy in the country 

PESHAWAR: An assembly of political leaders and tribal elders on Wednesday rejected the government’s decision to launch a new anti-terrorism operation, calling for peace in the country’s militancy-hit tribal areas.

The jirga is a term used to describe an all-male council in Pakistan’s tribal areas responsible for settling disputes and announcing decisions based on local laws and customs. 

Members of the civil society, youth, tribal elders and various political parties attended the jirga called by the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party in Peshawar to discuss the “Azm-e-Istehkam” anti-terrorism operation announced by the government last week. 

Pakistan’s top national security forum on Saturday announced it was launching Operation Azm-e-Istehkam or Resolve for Stability, to root out militants in the country. The decision was criticized, with the PTI and Jamiat Ulama-e-Pakistan-Fazl (JUI-F) parties accusing the government of not taking them into confidence about the move. 

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif sought to allay the opposition’s concerns on Tuesday, saying that contrary to previous military operations, the government was not launching a large-scale operation that would cause people to be displaced from their homes. Sharif clarified that the new operation only seeks to energize intelligence-based operations already taking place in the country. 

“If there isn’t peace in [erstwhile] Federally Administered Tribal Areas, peace in Pakistan is not possible,” Asad Qaiser, a PTI leader and former speaker of the National Assembly, told members of the jirga. 

“We don’t accept any kind of military operation and we will not leave the tribal people alone.”

Muhammad Iqbal Khan Afridi, another PTI lawmaker and the host of the jirga, noted militancy has once again returned to Pakistan’s northwestern tribal districts. 

“The jirga is called to raise voice for the restoration of the peace in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, especially in [ex] FATA,” he said. 

Afridi said it was the state’s responsibility to ensure peace in the tribal areas. 

Malak Jalal, a tribal elder from Pakistan’s restive North Waziristan district, opposed any new military operation in the country. 

“It has been more than 20 years that the region is in a state of war,” Jalal said. “We have given sacrifices but we don’t want any kind of operations on our land.”

He recalled how people in many cities and villages of northwestern Pakistan were displaced when the army launched operations in the late 2000s to drive away the Pakistani Taliban. 

“We were displaced and our houses were destroyed during the past military operations,” Jalal noted. “We will not tolerate any kind of military operation.”

CONSENSUS ON MILITARY OPERATION

Pakistan’s Defense Minister Khawaja Asif on Tuesday clarified that the government would build consensus in parliament over the military operation before enforcing it. 

“The opposition parties and the government’s allies will be given a suitable amount of time to debate it and their questions and reservations will be answered,” Asif told reporters at a news conference. 

The minister said the government did not want to achieve any “political objectives” through the operation. Rather, he said it wanted to combat the surge in militancy in the country and eliminate it for good. 

Pakistan has blamed the recent surge in militant attacks on neighboring Afghanistan, which it says allows Pakistani Taliban militants to hold camps and train insurgents to launch attacks inside Pakistan.

 Kabul denies this. Since last November, the Pakistan government has also launched a deportation drive under which over 600,000 Afghan nationals have been expelled from Pakistan.


‘Fully stand with Bangladesh’: Pakistan PM backs decision to boycott India match

Updated 7 sec ago
Follow

‘Fully stand with Bangladesh’: Pakistan PM backs decision to boycott India match

  • Pakistan’s government have not allowed the national cricket team to play its World Cup match against India on Feb. 15
  • Pakistan has accused India of influencing ICC decisions, criticized global cricket body for replacing Bangladesh in World Cup

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Wednesday backed his government’s decision to bar the national men’s cricket team from playing against India in the upcoming T20 World Cup tournament, reaffirming support for Bangladesh. 

Pakistan’s government announced on social media platform X last week that it has allowed its national team to travel to Sri Lanka for the World Cup. However, it said the Green Shirts will not take the field against India on their scheduled match on Feb. 15. 

Pakistan’s participation in the tournament was thrown into doubt after Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) Chairman Mohsin Naqvi criticized the International Cricket Council (ICC) for replacing Bangladesh with Scotland. The decision was taken after Bangladesh said it would not let its team travel to India out of security concerns. 

During a meeting of the federal cabinet, Sharif highlighted that Pakistan has said that politics should be kept away from sports. 

“We have taken this stand after careful consideration and in this regard, we should stand fully with Bangladesh,” Sharif said in televised remarks. 

“And I believe this is a very reasonable decision.”

Pakistan has blamed India for influencing the ICC’s decisions. The global cricket governing body is currently led by Jay Shah, the head of the Board of Control for Cricket in India. Shah is the son of Indian Home Minister Amit Shah. 

Pakistan’s boycott announcement has triggered media frenzy worldwide, with several Indian cricket experts and analysts criticizing Islamabad for the decision. An India-Pakistan cricket contest is by far the most lucrative and eagerly watched match of any ICC tournament. 

The ICC has ensured that the two rivals and Asian cricket giants are always in the same group of any ICC event since 2012 to capitalize on the high-stakes game. 

The two teams have played each other at neutral venues over the past several years, as bilateral cricket remains suspended between them since 2013 due to political tensions. 

Those tensions have persisted since the two nuclear-armed nations engaged in the worst fighting between them since 1999 in May 2025, after India blamed Pakistan for an attack in Indian-administered Kashmir that killed tourists. 

Pakistan denied India’s allegations that it was involved in the attack, calling for a credible probe into the incident.