Australia seeks military talks with China, ties with Philippines

Australian Deputy PM and Defense Minister Richard Marles speaks during the 21st Shangri-La Dialogue summit at the Shangri-La Hotel in Singapore Saturday. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 02 June 2024
Follow

Australia seeks military talks with China, ties with Philippines

  • “The substantive request that we had out of the meeting with China was to grow the defense dialogue,” Marles told Reuters

SINGAPORE: Australia has asked for military talks with China and is comfortable growing closer to the Philippines, Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles said on Sunday at the Shangri-La Dialogue security summit.

China and the Philippines are locked in confrontation in the disputed South China Sea and their encounters have grown more tense as Beijing presses its claims to shoals in waters that Manila says are well within its exclusive economic zone.

Australia has stepped up its presence in the region and a joint amphibious exercise with the Philippines at Palawan island in August was Australia’s biggest outside its own borders last year.

Australia has also said its recent encounters with China’s military fell short of being safe and professional, and Marles said he discussed the issue with Chinese defense chief Dong Jun on the sidelines of the conference on Saturday.

“The substantive request that we had out of the meeting with China was to grow the defense dialogue,” Marles told Reuters.

“We really want to get it ultimately back to where it was before it was stopped, and that would be at the level of our chiefs of defense force and our secretaries of defense meeting annually.”

Marles also held talks with Philippines Defense Secretary Gilberto Teodoro on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue.

“We definitely think that this is a moment where our relationship with the Philippines is really being taken to a level it’s never been before, and we very much welcome that,” said Marles.

“What we’re now seeing is a strategic dimension to that relationship being put in place, and that’s something that we greatly welcome, and we see this as growing even further.”


Trump sues the BBC for defamation over editing of January 6 speech, seeks up to $10 billion in damages

Updated 25 min 52 sec ago
Follow

Trump sues the BBC for defamation over editing of January 6 speech, seeks up to $10 billion in damages

  • A BBC spokesperson told Reuters earlier on Monday that it had “no further contact from President Trump’s lawyers at this point
  • The BBC is funded through a mandatory license fee on all TV viewers, which UK lawyers say could make any payout to Trump politically fraught

WASHING: President Donald Trump sued the BBC on Monday for defamation over edited clips of a speech that made it appear he directed supporters to storm the US Capitol, opening an international front in his fight against media coverage he deems untrue or unfair. Trump accused Britain’s publicly owned broadcaster of defaming him by splicing together parts of a January 6, 2021 speech, including one section where he told supporters to march on the Capitol and another where he said “fight like hell.” It omitted a section in which he called for peaceful protest.
Trump’s lawsuit alleges the BBC defamed him and violated a Florida law that bars deceptive and unfair trade practices. He is seeking $5 billion in damages for each of the lawsuit’s two counts. The BBC has apologized to Trump, admitted an error of judgment and acknowledged that the edit gave the mistaken impression that he had made a direct call for violent action. But it has said there is no legal basis to sue.
Trump, in his lawsuit filed Monday in Miami federal court, said the BBC despite its apology “has made no showing of actual remorse for its wrongdoing nor meaningful institutional changes to prevent future journalistic abuses.”
The BBC is funded through a mandatory license fee on all TV viewers, which UK lawyers say could make any payout to Trump politically fraught.
A spokesman for Trump’s legal team said in a statement the BBC “has a long pattern of deceiving its audience in coverage of President Trump, all in service of its own leftist political agenda.”
A BBC spokesperson told Reuters earlier on Monday that it had “no further contact from President Trump’s lawyers at this point. Our position remains the same.” The broadcaster did not immediately respond to a request for comment after the lawsuit was filed.

CRISIS LED TO RESIGNATIONS
Facing one of the biggest crises in its 103-year history, the BBC has said it has no plans to rebroadcast the documentary on any of its platforms.
The dispute over the clip, featured on the BBC’s “Panorama” documentary show shortly before the 2024 presidential election, sparked a public relations crisis for the broadcaster, leading to the resignations of its two most senior officials.
Trump’s lawyers say the BBC caused him overwhelming reputational and financial harm.
The documentary drew scrutiny after the leak of a BBC memo by an external standards adviser that raised concerns about how it was edited, part of a wider investigation of political bias at the publicly funded broadcaster.
The documentary was not broadcast in the United States.
Trump may have sued in the US because defamation claims in Britain must be brought within a year of publication, a window that has closed for the “Panorama” episode.
To overcome the US Constitution’s legal protections for free speech and the press, Trump will need to prove not only that the edit was false and defamatory but also that the BBC knowingly misled viewers or acted recklessly.
The broadcaster could argue that the documentary was substantially true and its editing decisions did not create a false impression, legal experts said. It could also claim the program did not damage Trump’s reputation.
Other media have settled with Trump, including CBS and ABC when Trump sued them following his comeback win in the November 2024 election.
Trump has filed lawsuits against the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and a newspaper in Iowa, all three of which have denied wrongdoing. The attack on the US Capitol in January 2021 was aimed at blocking Congress from certifying Joe Biden’s presidential win over Trump in the 2020 US election.