Pakistan mulls engaging international law firm to seek US waivers for Iran gas pipeline — official

An Iranian worker stands in front of a section of a pipeline after the project was launched during a ceremony with presidents of Iran and Pakistan on March 11, 2013 in the Iranian border city of Chah Bahar. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 26 March 2024
Follow

Pakistan mulls engaging international law firm to seek US waivers for Iran gas pipeline — official

  • Failed to complete project may force Pakistan to pay a daily penalty of $1 million to Iran starting from January 1, 2015 under the deal
  • Economists say the gas pipeline will help save precious foreign exchange being spent on LNG import, provide cheaper gas to consumers

ISLAMABAD: The Pakistani government is considering to engage an international law firm to explore options to seek the United States (US) sanction waivers to complete a natural gas pipeline project from neighboring Iran, a Pakistani government official said on Tuesday.

The development comes days after US Assistant Secretary of State Donald Lu told a Congressional hearing that President Joe Biden’s administration was working to prevent the Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline project, which the two countries agreed to in 2009.

However, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s government is planning to convince the US administration through “logical reasons” to secure waivers to complete the project which was essential to fulfil Pakistan’s energy needs.

“We are exploring different options at the moment to see as to how Pakistan could complete the project without facing US sanctions,” an official of the Pakistani energy ministry, who requested anonymity, told Arab News.

“One of the options is to hire an international legal firm like we did in the past to come up with a cogent plan to avoid US sanctions on the project.”

In July 2019, Pakistan hired a French law firm, Gide Loyrette Nouel, to deal with Iranian threat of moving an international court against Islamabad for its failure to execute the project and to find out a way if the project could be completed without attracting US sanctions.

Under an agreement signed between the two countries in 2009, the project was to be completed by December 2014 and would deliver 21.5 million cubic meters (760,000 million cubic feet) of gas per day to Pakistan. It was to be constructed using a segmented approach, with both countries laying down the pipeline on their respective sides of the border.

“Nothing is finalized yet as different legal and diplomatic options are on the cards to go ahead with the project,” the official said. “Definitely, we will be taking this up with the US citing some logical reasons for the project’s importance to Pakistan.”

The project is expected to boost Pakistan’s energy security and strengthen the local industry that can be assured a sustainable and enhanced gas supply. The construction of the pipeline is also expected to catalyze economic activity in Pakistan’s southwestern Balochistan province.

Syed Atif Zafar, chief economist at the Karachi-based Topline Securities brokerage firm, said Pakistan would get relatively cheaper gas as compared to the imported Liquefied natural gas (LNG), if the project was completed.

“The energy shortages would improve besides saving some foreign exchange that we are currently spending on the LNG import,” he told Arab News.

Zafar said if Pakistan failed to complete the project, it would have to pay a daily penalty of $1 million to Iran starting from January 1, 2015 under a penalty clause of the bilateral agreement.

“Pakistan cannot afford this penalty in any way, so we will have to find out a way to complete the project,” he added.

Tahir Abbas, head of research at the Arif Habib Limited securities and brokerage firm, said Pakistan’s total gas demand was around 6,000 million standard cubic feet per day (mmcfd), while the local production was just 3,300 mmcfd, and the country was importing around 1,000 mmcfd of LNG to meet its demand.

“We have been purchasing the LNG at around $12 per mmbtu and if Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline project is completed, we can get the gas at around $8 per mmbtu,” Abbas told Arab News.

“The IP project will help us save a lot of precious foreign exchange, besides supplying cheaper gas to industrial and residential consumers.”


Pakistan welcomes Afghan scholars’ reported resolution against use of soil for cross-border attacks

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan welcomes Afghan scholars’ reported resolution against use of soil for cross-border attacks

  • Around 1,000 Afghan scholars passed a resolution this week prohibiting use of Afghan soil for cross-border attacks against another country, Afghan media reported
  • Development takes place as tensions persist between Pakistan and Afghanistan amid Islamabad’s allegations of Taliban supporting cross-border attacks against it 

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s foreign office spokesperson on Thursday welcomed a resolution reportedly passed by Afghan scholars against allowing the use of Afghan soil for attacks against any other country, but still demanded written assurances of the same from the Afghan leadership. 

According to a report published by Afghan news channel Tolo News, around 1,000 Afghan scholars gathered in Kabul on Wednesday to pass a resolution that, among other things, said no one will be allowed to use Afghanistan’s soil against other countries for attacks. The resolution also said that if anyone fails to comply with this decision, the Afghan government has the right to take action against them.

The development takes place as tensions persist between Afghanistan and Pakistan. Both countries have engaged in border clashes since October, with Islamabad accusing Kabul of harboring militants that launch attacks on Pakistan.

Afghanistan denies the allegation and says it cannot be held responsible for Pakistan’s security. 

Speaking to reporters during a weekly press briefing, Foreign Office spokesperson Tahir Andrabi said he had not seen the full text of the resolution. 

“Any developments with regards to the fact that Afghan leadership, the segment of Afghan society, realized the gravity of the situation that their soil is being used by not just TTP, but also by their own nationals to perpetrate terrorism in Pakistan — any realization to this effect is positive and one would certainly welcome it,” Andrabi said.

However, he said similar commitments by Kabul on preventing cross-border attacks have been made in the past but were not honored. 

Pakistan and Kabul engaged in a series of peace talks in Istanbul and Doha recently after their deadly border clashes in October. Andrabi pointed out that Islamabad had insisted on getting written assurances from the Afghan leadership that they would prevent Afghan soil from being used by the Pakistani Taliban and other militant groups. However, he said Islamabad had not received any. 

He said the resolution by Afghan scholars does not qualify as a proper written assurance from Kabul as it does not explicitly mention Pakistan or the Pakistani Taliban.

’NO FORMAL EXTRADITION TREATY’

Commenting on media reports of Islamabad seeking extradition of certain individuals from the UK, Andrabi confirmed that there exists no formal extradition treaty between Pakistan and the UK. However, he said cases can still be processed individually.

“In the absence of a formal treaty, the extradition cases can be processed on a case-to-case basis,” the FO spokesperson said. “And certain cases were submitted to the British High Commission in Islamabad for their consideration.”

Pakistan last week asked the UK to extradite two prominent pro-Imran Khan figures, former accountability aide Shehzad Akbar and YouTuber-commentator Adil Raja, saying they were wanted on charges of anti-state propaganda.

The issue had been brought up during Pakistan Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi’s meeting with British High Commissioner Jane Marriott in Islamabad. The Interior Ministry said Naqvi had formally handed over Pakistan’s extradition documents, requesting that Raja and Akbar be returned to Pakistan without delay.