Second place in Illinois adopts Gaza ceasefire resolution

Downtown Bolingbrook at The Promenade.
Short Url
Updated 15 February 2024
Follow

Second place in Illinois adopts Gaza ceasefire resolution

  • It was unanimously approved in a vote by the board of trustees of Bolingbrook, a village in the southwestern suburbs of Chicago
  • ‘Our thoughts are with all those affected by the conflict and we remain committed to supporting peace and justice in the region,’ says Egyptian American Mary Alexander-Basta, the village mayor

CHICAGO: The board of trustees of Bolingbrook, a village in the southwestern suburbs of Chicago, has adopted a resolution calling for a humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza.

The mayor of Bolingbrook, which with a population of 73,755 is the 16th-largest population center in Illinois, is Egyptian American Mary Alexander-Basta, who has held the office since August 2020.

She said the resolution, unanimously approved on Tuesday, is a statement rejecting all of the violence, including the Oct. 7 attacks by Hamas on Israel and the continuing Israeli military assault on Gaza that followed.

“As the Mayor of Bolingbrook, I wholeheartedly embrace the richness of our community’s diversity,” Alexander-Basta added. “It is our greatest strength, fostering innovation, understanding and unity among all residents.

“Embracing diversity ensures that every voice is heard and every individual is valued, creating a vibrant and inclusive community where everyone can thrive.

“It is imperative that humanitarian aid reaches those in need and that efforts to rebuild infrastructure are prioritized to restore stability and hope for the future. Our thoughts are with all those affected by the conflict and we remain committed to supporting peace and justice in the region.”

The resolution “condemns all violence” and states: “The mayor and board of trustees of the village of Bolingbrook stand for peace and call for the return of hostages and prisoners.”

It advocates “a durable, sustained humanitarian cessation of hostilities, the rebuilding of civilians’ lives, and refostering economic development,” as well as “a lasting, permanent and viable peace coupled with dignity and respect for Israelis, Palestinians and every ethnic and religious group involved in the current conflict.”

The resolution, which is advisory only and not legally binding, was unanimously approved by the village board in a vote on Tuesday night. The respectful discussion during the Bolingbrook meeting contrasted sharply with the antagonism that ceasefire proponents have faced elsewhere in Chicago and other cities in Illinois, an overwhelmingly Democrat state.

The Chicago City Council, for example, approved a resolution on Jan. 31 following a contentious meeting. After a month of political wrangling and opposition from pro-Israel elected officials, it narrowly passed by a vote of 24 to 23.

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, who expressed sympathy for all victims of the violence, was forced to cast the deciding vote for the resolution, which also called for the “immediate and unconditional release” of all Israeli hostages held by Hamas.

A similar resolution presented on Feb. 5 to the village board of Orland Park, also in southwestern suburbs of Chicago, prompted a verbal assault by Mayor Keith Pekau against the large Arab and Muslim population of the village.

After a group of about 75 homeowners presented the mayor with a petition signed by 800 residents, he launched into a lengthy diatribe during which he questioned their “patriotism.” Having anticipated the delivery of the petition, he read a lengthy speech that was dismissive of Palestinian human rights. He also requested that 10 police officers be present at the meeting, more than normal, resulting in what some attendees described as a “hostile” and “intimidating” environment.

After condemning the actions of the residents and taxpayers, Pekau called a recess, ordered those observing it to leave and, after the room was cleared, he continued to deliver his speech, in which he told Arab and Muslim residents they could “go to another country” if they did not like the way the conduct of village officials.

“Mayor Pekau’s actions were very disrespectful,” said Shad Mohammed, who attended the meeting.

The mayor’s actions prompted some members of the community to hold meetings about challenging his campaign for reelection in April 2025, and to launch a voter-registration drive.

Image credit: Wikipedia


Federal judge issues order to prohibit immigration officials from detaining Kilmar Abrego Garcia

Updated 8 sec ago
Follow

Federal judge issues order to prohibit immigration officials from detaining Kilmar Abrego Garcia

  • His lawyers had sent an urgent request to the judge, warning that ICE officials could immediately place him back into custody
  • Instead, Abrego Garcia exited the building after a short appointment, emerging to cheers from supporters who had gathered outside

BALTIMORE, USA: A federal judge blocked US immigration authorities on Friday from re-detaining Kilmar Abrego Garcia, saying she feared they might take him into custody again just hours after she had ordered his release from a detention center.
The order came as Abrego Garcia appeared at a scheduled appointment at an Immigration and Customs Enforcement field office roughly 14 hours after he walked out of immigration detention facility in Pennsylvania.
His lawyers had sent an urgent request to the judge, warning that ICE officials could immediately place him back into custody. Instead, Abrego Garcia exited the building after a short appointment, emerging to cheers from supporters who had gathered outside.
Speaking briefly to the crowd, he urged others to “stand tall” against what he described as injustices carried out by the government.
Abrego Garcia became a flashpoint of the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown earlier this year when he was wrongly deported to a notorious prison in El Salvador. He was last taken into custody in August during a similar check-in.
Officials cannot re-detain him until the court conducts a hearing on the motion for the temporary restraining order, US District Judge Paula Xinis in Maryland said. She wrote that Abrego Garcia is likely to succeed on the merits of any further request for relief from ICE detention.
“For the public to have any faith in the orderly administration of justice, the Court’s narrowly crafted remedy cannot be so quickly and easily upended without further briefing and consideration,” she wrote.
Abrego Garcia on Friday stopped at a news conference outside the building, escorted by a group of supporters chanting “We are all Kilmar!”
Abrego Garcia says he has ‘so much hope’
“I stand before you a free man and I want you to remember me this way, with my head held up high,” Abrego Garcia said through a translator. “I come here today with so much hope and I thank God who has been with me since the start with my family.”
He urged people to keep fighting.
After Abrego Garcia spoke, he went through security at the field office, escorted by supporters.
When Abrego Garcia’s attorney, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, announced to the crowd assembled outside that his client would walk back out the field office’s doors again, he stressed that the legal fight was not over.
“Yesterday’s order from Judge Xinis and now the temporary restraining order this morning represent a victory of law over power,” Sandoval-Moshenberg said.
The agency freed him just before 5 p.m. on Thursday in response to a ruling from Xinis, who wrote federal authorities detained him after his return to the United States without any legal basis.
Mistakenly deported and then returned
Abrego Garcia is a Salvadoran citizen with an American wife and child who has lived in Maryland for years. He immigrated to the US illegally as a teenager to join his brother, who had become a US citizen. In 2019, an immigration judge granted him protection from being deported back to his home country, where he faces danger from a gang that targeted his family.
While he was allowed to live and work in the US under ICE supervision, he was not given residency status. Earlier this year, he was mistakenly deported and held in a notoriously brutal Salvadoran prison despite having no criminal record.
Facing mounting public pressure and a court order, President Donald Trump’s Republican administration brought him back to the US in June, but only after issuing an arrest warrant on human smuggling charges in Tennessee. He has pleaded not guilty to those charges and asked a federal judge there to dismiss them.
A lawsuit to block removal from the US
The 2019 settlement found he had a “well founded fear” of danger in El Salvador if he was deported there. So instead ICE has been seeking to deport him to a series of African countries. Abrego Garcia has sued, claiming the Trump administration is illegally using the removal process to punish him for the public embarrassment caused by his deportation.
In her order releasing Abrego Garcia, Xinis wrote that federal authorities “did not just stonewall” the court, “They affirmatively misled the tribunal.” Xinis also rejected the government’s argument that she lacked jurisdiction to intervene on a final removal order for Abrego Garcia, because she found no final order had been filed.
ICE freed Abrego Garcia from Moshannon Valley Processing Center, about 115 miles (185 kilometers) northeast of Pittsburgh, on Thursday just before the deadline Xinis gave the government to provide an update on Abrego Garcia’s release.
He returned home to Maryland a few hours later.
Immigration check-in

Check-ins are how ICE keeps track of some people who are released by the government to pursue asylum or other immigration cases as they make their way through a backlogged court system. The appointments were once routine but many people have been detained at their check-ins since the start of Trump’s second term.
The Department of Homeland Security sharply criticized Xinis’ order and vowed to appeal, calling the ruling “naked judicial activism” by a judge appointed during the Obama administration.
“This order lacks any valid legal basis, and we will continue to fight this tooth and nail in the courts,” said Tricia McLaughlin, the department’s assistant secretary.
Sandoval-Moshenberg said the judge made it clear that the government can’t detain someone indefinitely without legal authority.
Abrego Garcia has also applied for asylum in the US in immigration court.
Charges in Tennessee
Abrego Garcia was hit with human smuggling and conspiracy to commit human smuggling charges when the US government brought him back from El Salvador. Prosecutors alleged he accepted money to transport within the United States people who were in the country illegally.
The charges stem from a 2022 traffic stop in Tennessee for speeding. Body camera footage from a Tennessee Highway Patrol officer shows a calm exchange with Abrego Garcia. There were nine passengers in the car, and the officers discussed among themselves their suspicions of smuggling. However, Abrego Garcia was eventually allowed to continue driving with only a warning.
A Department of Homeland Security agent testified at an earlier hearing that he did not begin investigating the traffic stop until after the US Supreme Court said in April that the Trump administration must work to bring back Abrego Garcia.