Second place in Illinois adopts Gaza ceasefire resolution

Downtown Bolingbrook at The Promenade.
Short Url
Updated 15 February 2024
Follow

Second place in Illinois adopts Gaza ceasefire resolution

  • It was unanimously approved in a vote by the board of trustees of Bolingbrook, a village in the southwestern suburbs of Chicago
  • ‘Our thoughts are with all those affected by the conflict and we remain committed to supporting peace and justice in the region,’ says Egyptian American Mary Alexander-Basta, the village mayor

CHICAGO: The board of trustees of Bolingbrook, a village in the southwestern suburbs of Chicago, has adopted a resolution calling for a humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza.

The mayor of Bolingbrook, which with a population of 73,755 is the 16th-largest population center in Illinois, is Egyptian American Mary Alexander-Basta, who has held the office since August 2020.

She said the resolution, unanimously approved on Tuesday, is a statement rejecting all of the violence, including the Oct. 7 attacks by Hamas on Israel and the continuing Israeli military assault on Gaza that followed.

“As the Mayor of Bolingbrook, I wholeheartedly embrace the richness of our community’s diversity,” Alexander-Basta added. “It is our greatest strength, fostering innovation, understanding and unity among all residents.

“Embracing diversity ensures that every voice is heard and every individual is valued, creating a vibrant and inclusive community where everyone can thrive.

“It is imperative that humanitarian aid reaches those in need and that efforts to rebuild infrastructure are prioritized to restore stability and hope for the future. Our thoughts are with all those affected by the conflict and we remain committed to supporting peace and justice in the region.”

The resolution “condemns all violence” and states: “The mayor and board of trustees of the village of Bolingbrook stand for peace and call for the return of hostages and prisoners.”

It advocates “a durable, sustained humanitarian cessation of hostilities, the rebuilding of civilians’ lives, and refostering economic development,” as well as “a lasting, permanent and viable peace coupled with dignity and respect for Israelis, Palestinians and every ethnic and religious group involved in the current conflict.”

The resolution, which is advisory only and not legally binding, was unanimously approved by the village board in a vote on Tuesday night. The respectful discussion during the Bolingbrook meeting contrasted sharply with the antagonism that ceasefire proponents have faced elsewhere in Chicago and other cities in Illinois, an overwhelmingly Democrat state.

The Chicago City Council, for example, approved a resolution on Jan. 31 following a contentious meeting. After a month of political wrangling and opposition from pro-Israel elected officials, it narrowly passed by a vote of 24 to 23.

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, who expressed sympathy for all victims of the violence, was forced to cast the deciding vote for the resolution, which also called for the “immediate and unconditional release” of all Israeli hostages held by Hamas.

A similar resolution presented on Feb. 5 to the village board of Orland Park, also in southwestern suburbs of Chicago, prompted a verbal assault by Mayor Keith Pekau against the large Arab and Muslim population of the village.

After a group of about 75 homeowners presented the mayor with a petition signed by 800 residents, he launched into a lengthy diatribe during which he questioned their “patriotism.” Having anticipated the delivery of the petition, he read a lengthy speech that was dismissive of Palestinian human rights. He also requested that 10 police officers be present at the meeting, more than normal, resulting in what some attendees described as a “hostile” and “intimidating” environment.

After condemning the actions of the residents and taxpayers, Pekau called a recess, ordered those observing it to leave and, after the room was cleared, he continued to deliver his speech, in which he told Arab and Muslim residents they could “go to another country” if they did not like the way the conduct of village officials.

“Mayor Pekau’s actions were very disrespectful,” said Shad Mohammed, who attended the meeting.

The mayor’s actions prompted some members of the community to hold meetings about challenging his campaign for reelection in April 2025, and to launch a voter-registration drive.

Image credit: Wikipedia


UN’s top court opens Myanmar Rohingya genocide case

Updated 14 min 8 sec ago
Follow

UN’s top court opens Myanmar Rohingya genocide case

  • The Gambia filed a case against Myanmar at the UN’s top court in 2019
  • Verdict expected to impact Israel’s genocide case over war on Gaza

DHAKA: The International Court of Justice on Monday opened a landmark case accusing Myanmar of genocide against its mostly Muslim Rohingya minority.

The Gambia filed a case against Myanmar at the UN’s top court in 2019, two years after a military offensive forced hundreds of thousands of Rohingya from their homes into neighboring Bangladesh.

The hearings will last three weeks and conclude on Jan. 29.

“The ICJ must secure justice for the persecuted Rohingya. This process should not take much longer, as we all know that justice delayed is justice denied,” said Asma Begum, who has been living in the Kutupalong refugee camp in Bangladesh’s Cox’s Bazar district since 2017.

A mostly Muslim ethnic minority, the Rohingya have lived for centuries in Myanmar’s western Rakhine state but were stripped of their citizenship in the 1980s and have faced systemic persecution ever since.

In 2017 alone, some 750,000 of them fled military atrocities and crossed to Bangladesh, in what the UN has called a textbook case of ethnic cleansing by Myanmar.

Today, about 1.3 million Rohingya shelter in 33 camps in Cox’s Bazar, turning the coastal district into the world’s largest refugee settlement.

“We experienced horrific acts such as arson, killings and rape in 2017, and fled to Bangladesh,” Begum told Arab News.

“I believe the ICJ verdict will pave the way for our repatriation to our homeland. The world should not forget us.”

A UN fact-finding mission has concluded that the Myanmar 2017 offensive included “genocidal acts” — an accusation rejected by Myanmar, which said it was a “clearance operation” against militants.

Now, there is hope for justice and a new future for those who have been displaced for years.

“We also have the right to live with dignity. I want to return to my homeland and live the rest of my life in my ancestral land. My children will reconnect with their roots and be able to build their own future,” said Syed Ahmed, who fled Myanmar in 2017 and has since been raising his four children in the Kutupalong camp.

“Despite the delay, I am optimistic that the perpetrators will be held accountable through the ICJ verdict. It will set a strong precedent for the world.”

The Myanmar trial is the first genocide case in more than a decade to be taken up by the ICJ. The outcome will also impact the genocide case that Israel is facing over its war on Gaza.

“The momentum of this case at the ICJ will send a strong message to all those (places) around the world where crimes against humanity have been committed,” Nur Khan, a Bangladeshi lawyer and human rights activist, told Arab News.

“The ICJ will play a significant role in ensuring justice regarding accusations of genocide in other parts of the world, such as the genocide and crimes against humanity committed by Israel against the people of Gaza.”