Mancini faces fierce backlash as he turns back on players, fans and potentially his job

Saudi FA President Yasser Al-Meshal was less scathing but made his displeasure clear: “Mancini’s early departure is unacceptable, however, the coach met with the players and thanked them. (X.com SCREENGRAB)
Short Url
Updated 31 January 2024
Follow

Mancini faces fierce backlash as he turns back on players, fans and potentially his job

  • As Saudi Arabia exited the AFC Asian Cup on penalties, the Italian coach had symbolically already departed the arena
  • Across social media platforms, angry supporters accused Mancini of cowardice and arrogance for his actions

It may end up being the defining moment of Roberto Mancini’s managerial career. At least of his time in charge of Saudi Arabia.

The symbolism of his behavior was hard to miss.

When the Italian coach walked down the tunnel at Education City Stadium before the penalty shootout loss to South Korea had even been confirmed, Mancini had not only turned his back on his players, the supporters and the nation, but very likely his job as well.

Condemnation in the wake of Saudi Arabia’s exit from the AFC Asian Cup was immediate and came from many quarters.

One fan on X summed up many angry supporters’ sentiments.

“A cowardly coach who does not take responsibility and does not stand with his players. He started the tournament with a strange statement that affected the team and the fans and ended it with an ugly escape that only a coward can do!”

Saudi Arabia’s football association President Yasser Al-Meshal was less scathing but made his displeasure clear: “Mancini’s early departure is unacceptable, however, the coach met with the players and thanked them.”

It could have been so different for the Green Falcons and their coach.

If 90 minutes is a long time in football then 90 seconds was an age on Tuesday. That was the difference between Saudi Arabia securing a famous win over South Korea and moving to the quarterfinals, and conceding a 99th minute equalizer before losing on penalties. That was the difference between delight and despair; between praise for a winning coach and the backlash that is raging online.

The last-minute equalizer and shootout loss were hard enough for the thousands of Saudi Arabia fans who raised the roof at the Education City Stadium and the millions watching at home.

But the sight of Mancini leaving the pitch — where he had minutes earlier linked arms with his coaching staff — to head down the tunnel before the final penalty had been taken, would have been hard to stomach.

The image will be a lasting one whether he stays in charge or not.

At the post-match press conference, the Italian apologized, saying that he did not know the shootout had finished. True or not — and it seems a strange claim — it is hard to say which looks worse; leaving early or thinking a game had finished when it had not. One Korean commentator assumed Mancini had been sent off as he could think of no other explanation.

The damage had already been done. The immediate reaction online in Saudi Arabia was bitter. “The match was handed to the Koreans from the 75th minute with the wrong changes,” one fan commented on X. “There is no need for his departure. The least he can do is to appreciate the players, and console them and encourage them.”

Anger was mixed with disappointment and heartbreak.

“I challenge him to do this in Italy … arrogant arrogant,” said another poster. “He accused national team players of desertion and stripped them of their chance to represent their country. He was the first to escape.”

The comment refers to an explosive press conference at the start of the tournament. After Mancini had controversially left out Salman Al-Faraj, Sultan Al-Ghannam and Nawaf Al-Aqidi, he claimed that these established international stars, who play for the big Riyadh clubs Al-Hilal and Al-Nassr, wanted to pick and choose their games.

Such actions could only be forgotten or forgiven if success follows, and for a time that looked possible. Two late goals produced a dramatic 2-1 win over Oman in the opening game. Then there was a comfortable 2-0 win over Kyrgyzstan, but not much more could be read into that as the Central Asians had two men sent off. The group stage ended with a 0-0 draw against Thailand, but then both teams were already through.

It was not bad, but neither was it inspiring. Saudi Arabia had at least topped their Group F.

Last night’s round of 16 clash with South Korea could have been a turning point. For much of the game, the star-studded East Asians created nothing, but as Saudi Arabia, ahead 1-0 thanks to Abdullah Radif, sat deeper and deeper, the Red attacks started with about 10 minutes remaining and they never really stopped.

Mancini’s conservative substitutes would have looked wise had the team held out but Cho Gue-song’s 99th minute header put paid to that. And in the end, it was a deserved goal. The Green Falcons had no answer and Mancini’s much-vaunted tactical acumen, which had taken Italy to the European Championship glory in 2021, failed him. Or rather, it fell short by about 90 seconds.

Then came his shocking stage exit, and the fierce backlash it sparked is unlikely to abate any time soon.

Said one person online: “There is no commander of a battle who escapes while his soldiers are on its ground ... For many years in the sports community, we have never seen a coach leave the field while his team was playing ... When Mancini felt the loss, he ran away!”

Whether he returns remains to be seen.


History-chasing Djokovic and Alcaraz to meet in Australian Open final after epic semifinal wins

Updated 31 January 2026
Follow

History-chasing Djokovic and Alcaraz to meet in Australian Open final after epic semifinal wins

  • Carlos Alcaraz striving to become the youngest man ever to complete a career Grand Slam
  • Novak Djokovic is aiming to be the oldest man in the Open era to win a Grand Slam title

MELBOURNE: Novak Djokovic finally beat one of the two men who have been blocking his path to an unprecedented 25th Grand Slam singles title when he edged Jannik Sinner in five sets Friday to reach the Australian Open final.
To get that coveted No. 25, he’ll next have to beat the other: top-ranked Carlos Alcaraz.
They’re both chasing history in Sunday’s championship decider, with the 22-year-old Alcaraz striving to become the youngest man ever to complete a career Grand Slam.
The top-ranked Alcaraz also had to come through a grueling five-setter. He fended off No. 3 Alexander Zverev 6-4, 7-6 (5), 6-7 (3), 6-7 (4), 7-5 in a match that started in the warmth of the afternoon Friday and, 5 hours and 27 minutes later, became the longest semifinal ever at the Australian Open.
That pushed the start of Djokovic’s match against Sinner back a couple of hours, and the 38-year-old Djokovic finally finished off a 3-6, 6-3, 4-6, 6-4, 6-4 win just after 1:30 a.m.
“It feels surreal,” Djokovic said of his 4-hour, 9-minute triumph. “Honestly, it feels like winning already tonight. I know I have to come back … and fight the No. 1 of the world. I just hope that I’ll have enough gas to stay toe-to-toe with him.
“That’s my desire. Let the God decide the winner.”
Djokovic was at the peak of his defensive powers, fending off 16 of the 18 breakpoints he faced against the two-time defending Australian Open champion. It ended a run of five losses to Sinner, and a run of four semifinal exits for Djokovic at the majors.
“Had many chances, couldn’t use them, and that’s the outcome,” Sinner said. “Yeah, it hurts, for sure.”
Alcaraz and Sinner have split the last eight major titles between them since Djokovic won his last title at the 2023 US Open.
Nobody knows how to win more at Melbourne Park than Djokovic. He has won all 10 times he’s contested the Australian Open final.
He said he saw Alcaraz after the first of the semifinals was over and he congratulated him on reaching his first final at Melbourne Park.
“He said sorry to delay,” Djokovic later explained. “I told him ‘I’m an old man, I need to go earlier to sleep!”
Djokovic, aiming to be the oldest man in the Open era to win a Grand Slam title, was kept up late.
“I’m looking forward to meeting him on Sunday,” he said.
Final 4
With the top four seeds reaching the Australian Open men’s semifinals for just the fifth time, Day 13 was destined to produce some drama. The season-opening major had been a relatively slow burn, until the back-to-back five-setters lasting a combined 9 hours and 36 minutes.
Alcaraz and Zverev, the 2025 runner-up, surpassed the 2009 classic between Rafael Nadal and Fernando Verdasco as the longest ever Australian Open semifinal.
Medical timeout
Alcaraz was as close as two points from victory in the third set but was hampered by pain in his upper right leg and his medical timeout became contentious.
He said initially it didn’t feel like cramping because the pain seemed to be just in one muscle, the right adductor, and he needed an assessment.
He navigated the third and fourth sets and was behind in the fifth after dropping serve in the first game. He kept up the pressure but didn’t break back until Zverev was serving for the match. He then won the last four games.
“I think physically we just pushed each other to the limit today. We pushed our bodies to the limit,” Alcaraz said. “Just really, really happy to get the win, that I came back. I just rank this one in the top position of one of the best matches that I have ever won.”
Believe
Asked how he was able to recover despite being so close to defeat, Alcaraz admitted he was struggling but said kept “believing, believing, all the time.”
“I’ve been in these situations, I’ve been in these kinds of matches before, so I knew what I had to do,” he said. “I had to put my heart into the match. I think I did it. I fought until the last ball.”
Zverev was demonstrably upset about the time out out in the third set, taking it up with a tournament supervisor, when his rival was given the three-minute break for treatment and a massage on the leg.
After the match, he maintained that he didn’t think it was right, but he didn’t think it should overshadow the match.
“I don’t want to talk about this right now, because I think this is one of the best battles there ever was in Australia,” he said “It doesn’t deserve to be the topic now.”