China sanctions 5 US defense companies in response to US sanctions and arms sales to Taiwan

1 / 2
A Switchblade 600 loitering missile drone manufactured by AeroVironment is displayed at the Eurosatory arms show in Villepinte, north of Paris, on June 14, 2022. AeroVironment was among five American defense-related companies sanctioned by China on Sunday in response to US arms sales to Taiwan. (AP/File)
2 / 2
A man walks past a screen in the BAE Systems chalet at the Farnborough Airshow in England on July 16, 2018. BAE Systems was among five American defense-related companies sanctioned by China on Sunday in response to US arms sales to Taiwan. (AP/File)
Short Url
Updated 07 January 2024
Follow

China sanctions 5 US defense companies in response to US sanctions and arms sales to Taiwan

  • The sanctions will freeze any property the companies have in China and prohibit organizations and individuals in China from doing business with them
  • The US last month approved the sale of about $300 million in communications and other defense-related equipment to Taiwan

BEIJING: China announced sanctions Sunday on five American defense-related companies in response to US arms sales to Taiwan and USsanctions on Chinese companies and individuals.

The sanctions will freeze any property the companies have in China and prohibit organizations and individuals in China from doing business with them, the Foreign Ministry said in a statement posted online.
The companies are BAE Systems Land and Armament, Alliant Techsystems Operation, AeroVironment, ViaSat and Data Link Solutions.
The Foreign Ministry said the US moves harmed China’s sovereignty and security interests, undermined peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait, and violated the rights and interests of Chinese companies and individuals.
“The Chinese government remains unwavering in our resolve to safeguard national sovereignty, security and territorial integrity and protect the lawful rights and interests of Chinese companies and citizens,” the ministry statement said.
The US last month approved the sale of about $300 million in communications and other defense-related equipment to Taiwan. At the time, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin warned that China would take countermeasures against companies involved in arms sales to Taiwan.
Taiwan is a major flashpoint in US-China relations that analysts worry could explode into military conflict between the two powers. China regards Taiwan, a self-governing island off its east coast, as a renegade province that must come under Beijing’s control at some point in the future. It views US arms sales to Taiwan as interference in its domestic affairs.
The Chinese military regularly sends fighter planes and ships into and over the waters around Taiwan, in part to deter the island’s government from declaring formal independence. An invasion doesn’t appear imminent, but the constant military activity serves as a reminder that the threat is ever present.
The US switched diplomatic recognition from Taiwan to China in 1971, but it is bound by its own laws to ensure that Taiwan has the ability to defend itself. It and its allies sail warships through the Taiwan Strait, a 160-kilometer-wide (100-mile) waterway that separates the island from China.


Guterres warns UN risks ‘imminent financial collapse’

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Guterres warns UN risks ‘imminent financial collapse’

  • “Member States must fundamentally overhaul our financial rules to prevent an imminent financial collapse,” Guterres wrote
  • Trump has often questioned the UN’s relevance and attacked its priorities

UNITED NATIONS: United Nations chief Antonio Guterres on Friday warned that the world body is on the brink of financial collapse and could run out of cash by July, as he urged countries to pay their dues.
The UN faces chronic budget problems because some member states do not pay their mandatory contributions in full, while others do not pay on time, forcing it into hiring freezes and cutbacks.
“Either all Member States honor their obligations to pay in full and on time — or Member States must fundamentally overhaul our financial rules to prevent an imminent financial collapse,” Secretary-General Guterres wrote in a letter.
US President Donald Trump’s administration has in recent months reduced its funding to some UN agencies and has rejected or delayed some mandatory contributions.
Trump has often questioned the UN’s relevance and attacked its priorities.
The organization’s top decision-making body, the Security Council, is paralyzed because of tensions between the United States and Russia and China, all three of which are permanent, veto-wielding members.
Trump also launched his “Board of Peace” this month, which critics say is intended to become a rival to the UN.

- ‘Untenable’ -

Although more than 150 member states have paid their dues, the UN ended 2025 with $1.6 billion in unpaid contributions — more than double the amount for 2024.
“The current trajectory is untenable. It leaves the Organization exposed to structural financial risk,” Guterres wrote.
The UN is also facing a related problem: it must reimburse member states for unspent funds, Farhan Haq, one of the Guterres’ spokespeople, said during a press briefing.
The secretary-general also highlighted that problem, writing in the letter: “We are trapped in a Kafkaesque cycle; expected to give back cash that does not exist.”
“The practical reality is stark: unless collections drastically improve, we cannot fully execute the 2026 program budget approved in December,” Guterres’ wrote, adding: “Worse still, based on historical trends, regular budget cash could run out by July.”
Guterres, who will step down at the end of 2026, this month gave his last annual speech setting out his priorities for the year ahead and said the world was riven with “self-defeating geopolitical divides (and) brazen violations of international law.”
He also slammed “wholesale cuts in development and humanitarian aid” — an apparent reference to deep cuts to the budgets of UN agencies made by the United States under the Trump administration’s “America First” policies.