Head of Gulf Research Center clarifies comments on Gaza published in Le Monde newspaper

The chair of the Gulf Research Center, Abdulaziz Sager, on Thursday wrote to French newspaper Le Monde clarifying his position on comments about the conflict in Gaza. (Reuters/File Photo)
Short Url
Updated 21 December 2023
Follow

Head of Gulf Research Center clarifies comments on Gaza published in Le Monde newspaper

  • Sager’s letter was in response to an article published in the newspaper on Dec 20
  • He says quotes attributed to him about a possible Saudi-French plan to exile Hamas leaders to Algeria were personal opinions and not the policy of any government body

LONDON: The chair of the Gulf Research Center, Abdulaziz Sager, on Thursday wrote to French newspaper Le Monde clarifying his position on comments about the conflict in Gaza that were attributed to him in a story published the previous day.

The newspaper’s story suggested that there was a proposed joint Saudi-French plan to exile Hamas leaders to Algeria. However, sources have denied this.

Sager said that the opinions expressed by him in the Le Monde story were his own, shared off the record, and did not reflect or represent the views of any official body or organization.

He wrote: “I read the article published in your newspaper on Dec. 20, 2023, by journalist Benjamin Barthe,” titled Transfer Hamas military leaders to Algiers: A Saudi plan submitted to the French Foreign Ministry.

“In it, the journalist mentioned some opinions that were attributed to me regarding Gaza. In all cases, I express my own opinions as a researcher interested in Gulf affairs and as the head of an independent research institution.

“These opinions were not meant for publishing. Naturally, they do not reflect the opinions of any governmental or official body whatsoever.

“I wanted to clarify that all that has been mentioned in the piece, attributed to me, does not reflect the position of any government body, whether Saudi or French, but mere personal ideas, suggestions and opinions.”


Disinformation the new enemy in disaster zones, says Red Cross

Updated 05 March 2026
Follow

Disinformation the new enemy in disaster zones, says Red Cross

  • “Harmful information and dehumanizing narratives” undermines humanitarian aid and putting lives of aid workers at risk
  • Between 2020 and 2024, disasters affected nearly 700 million people, displaced over 105 million, and killed more than 270,000 — doubling the number in need of humanitarian aid

GENEVA: The rise of disinformation is undermining humanitarian aid and putting lives at risk, while disasters are affecting ever more people, the Red Cross warned Thursday.
“Between 2020 and 2024, disasters affected nearly 700 million people, caused more than 105 million displacements, and claimed over 270,000 lives,” the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies said.
The number of people needing humanitarian assistance more than doubled in the same timeframe, the IFRC said in its World Disasters Report 2026.
But the world’s largest humanitarian network said that “harmful information and dehumanizing narratives” were increasingly undermining trust, putting the lives of aid workers at risk.
“In polarized and politically-charged contexts, humanitarian principles such as neutrality and impartiality are increasingly misunderstood, misrepresented or deliberately attacked online,” it said.
The IFRC has more than 17 million volunteers across more than 191 countries.
“In every crisis I have witnessed, information is as essential as food, water and shelter,” said the Geneva-based federation’s secretary general Jagan Chapagain.
“But when information is false, misleading or deliberately manipulated, it can deepen fear, obstruct humanitarian access and cost lives.”
He said harmful information was not a new phenomenon, but it was now moving “with unprecedented speed and reach.”
Chapagain said digital platforms were proving “fertile ground for lies.”
The IFRC report said the challenge nowadays was no longer about the availability of information but its reliability, noting that the production and spread of disinformation was easily amplified by artificial intelligence.

- ‘Life and death’ -

The report cited numerous recent examples of harmful information hampering crisis response.
During the 2024 floods in Valencia, false narratives online accused the Spanish Red Cross of diverting aid to migrants, which in turn fueled “xenophobic attacks on volunteers,” the IFRC said.
In South Sudan, rumors that humanitarian agencies were distributing poisoned food “caused people to avoid life-saving aid” and led to threats against Red Cross staff.
In Lebanon, false claims that volunteers were spreading Covid-19, favoring certain groups with aid and providing unsafe cholera vaccines eroded trust and endangered vulnerable communities, the IFRC said.
And in Bangladesh, during political unrest, volunteers faced “widespread accusations of inaction and political alignment,” leading to harassment and reputational damage, it added.
Similar events were registered by the IFRC in Sudan, Myanmar, Peru, the United States, New Zealand, Canada, Kenya and Bulgaria.
The report underlined that around 94 percent of disasters were handled by national authorities and local communities, without international interventions.
“However, while volunteers, local leaders and community media are often the most trusted messengers, they operate in increasingly hostile and polarized information environments,” the IFRC said.
The federation called on governments, tech firms, humanitarian agencies and local actors to recognize that reliable information “is a matter of life and death.”
“Without trust, people are less likely to prepare, seek help or follow life-saving guidance; with it, communities act together, absorb shocks and recover more effectively,” said Chapagain.
The organization urged technology platforms to prioritize authoritative information from trusted sources in crisis contexts, and transparently moderate harmful content.
And it said humanitarian agencies needed to make preparing to deal with disinformation “a core function” of their operations, with trained teams and analytics.