Pakistan pledges ‘maximum security’ for general election amid threats

Pakistan's caretaker Interior Minister Sarfraz Bugti speaks during a press conference in Islamabad, Pakistan, on October 26, 2023. (AP/File)
Short Url
Updated 09 December 2023
Follow

Pakistan pledges ‘maximum security’ for general election amid threats

  • The statement comes amid surge in militant attacks across Pakistan’s western regions bordering Afghanistan
  • Pakistan is scheduled to hold national elections on February 8 after months of delay and political uncertainty

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s Caretaker Interior Minister Sarfaraz Bugti on Friday pledged “maximum security” for the upcoming general election, scheduled for February 8, acknowledging that there were threats to politicians and public rallies. 

The development comes amid a surge in militant attacks across in Pakistan’s western regions bordering Afghanistan ever since a fragile truce between Islamabad and the Pakistani Taliban broke down in November 2022. 

Recently, the Jamiat Ulama-e-Islam Pakistan (JUI-F), a prominent religious party, urged the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) to delay the polls till the security situation in the country improves and the cold in Pakistan’s northern areas dissipates. 

Speaking at a press conference in Islamabad, Bugti said the caretaker government would fulfil all requirements of the election regulator for a peaceful conduct of the elections. 

“Whatever requirement the election commission would have with regard to paramilitary forces, we will provide that,” he said. “We will try providing maximum security.” 

The interior minister agreed there was a “general threat” to public rallies in the country, but no specific threat to a political leader, except for the JUI-F chief. 

“Definitely, there are threats to the political leadership,” he said. “There is definitely a general threat to public rallies.” 

The interior minister said the caretaker government had the “capacity and will” for the conduct of a peaceful election. 

He, however, said the deployment of army was a domain of the country’s defense ministry. 

Bugti’s statement came days after a senior ECP official requested the government for the deployment of armed forces at polling stations during the February 8 elections to ensure foolproof security arrangements. 

“Keeping in view, the deficiency of Police personnel indicated by the Provinces and the Federal Capital, the Election Commission of Pakistan has decided that in view of the clear shortfall of 277,558 personnel, the services of Pakistan Army and Civil Armed Forces (CAFs) shall have to be requisitioned in static mode in terms of Article 220 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan at the Polling Stations to ensure smooth elections,” ECP Secretary Omar Hamid Khan wrote to the interior ministry. 

“This is all the more relevant in the context of fragile security cum law-and-order situation prevalent in country.” 

Khan said as per reports from inspector generals of police (IGPs) of all four provinces and Islamabad, there was a shortfall of around 4,500 police personnel in the capital city, 169,110 in Punjab, 56,717 in KP, 33,462 in Sindh, and 13,769 in Balochistan. 

The regulator said as per Article 220 of Pakistan’s constitution, all executive authorities of the administration and the provinces were bound to assist the ECP in its task of holding free, fair and transparent elections. 


Evictees of slum near Islamabad’s diplomatic quarter claim abandonment as city cites security, illegal settlement

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Evictees of slum near Islamabad’s diplomatic quarter claim abandonment as city cites security, illegal settlement

  • Authorities say evictees were compensated in the early 2000s, settlement built later illegally
  • Evictees, for whom historical and emotional costs outweigh legal arguments, say they feel abandoned

ISLAMABAD: Muzaffar Hussain Shah bends down, picks up a brick from the rubble and cleans it with a hammer. Until a few weeks ago, the brick had been part of a home where Shah had lived for nearly five decades, since his birth.

The house in an informal settlement in Islamabad, which came to be known as Muslim Colony, was demolished in an anti-encroachment drive. Shah said he has spent past three weeks sleeping under the open sky and has been collecting the last remaining bricks to get by for a few more days.

Shah, 48, is one of nearly 15,000 people evicted by the Capital Development Authority (CDA) from the settlement, which was established in the 1960s to house laborers who built Pakistan’s capital of Islamabad, during a drive that began in November.

The decades-old settlement, located near the prime minister’s official residence and the Diplomatic Enclave, a specially designated area within the city that houses foreign embassies, high commissions and international missions, has now been reduced to a 712-kanal (89-acre) stretch of dust and debris.

“It feels as if there is neither a sky over our heads nor anyone behind our backs,” Shah told Arab News on Tuesday, surrounded by the rubble of his demolished home. “Nor is there anything ahead of us. We cannot see anything at all.”

Man collecting rubble from a demolished colony in Islamabad, Pakistan, on December 30, 2025. (AN photo)

While evacuated residents recount a tale of what they described as broken political promises and affiliation with the place, authorities say there were “obviously security concerns”, and that claims to the land were settled two decades ago. 

During an interview with Arab News, Dr. Anam Fatima, director of municipal administration at the Islamabad Metropolitan Corporation, showed satellite images of the “informal settlement” from 2002.

The images showed significant population growth over the years, which she said indicated that most current residents arrived after 2002, when the government negotiated the resettlement of original residents in return for compensation.

“In 2002, it was decided that these people will be compensated, and they were accordingly compensated,” Fatima said.

“Seven hundred and fifty [residents] were found eligible. They were given plots in Farash Town,” she said about a neighborhood on Islamabad’s outskirts. “Some of them moved, some of them did not, but the original settlement was not removed, unfortunately.”

Man cutting tree trunk in Islamabad, Pakistan, on December 30, 2025. (AN photo)

The official attributed the survival of the settlement and its subsequent growth to “enforcement failure” and “changing policies” over the years, insisting that all legal formalities were met before the latest operation.

“Notices were given first to vacate and then after the evacuations had been done... people had completely moved their belongings, only then bulldozers were sent into the area,” Fatima said.

For the evacuated residents, the historical and emotional costs outweigh the legal arguments, they say. Many claim their families moved there more than six decades ago and were promised permanent housing in exchange for their labor.

Muhammad Hafeez, whose father arrived in 1972, lamented that the ones who had helped built Islamabad were being rewarded in the form of eviction from the same city.

“Allah will definitely question you about this,” he said.

Man collecting rubble from a demolished colony in Islamabad, Pakistan, on December 30, 2025. (AN photo)

Muhammad Khalil, 62, another evictee, blamed CDA officials for allowing the settlement not just to exist but also to grow over the years.

“We did not bring these houses down from space and place them here. CDA officials were present here, they were aware of the developments taking place every single minute, every moment,” he said.

“Their vehicles would come daily. We built these houses right in front of them.”

As bulldozers cleared the land this month, many residents of Muslim Colony said they felt abandoned by the city they once helped build.

“All of this Islamabad that has been built was built by our elders,” Shah said. “Laborers used to live here. And today, after having built Islamabad, today, we have become illegal.”

Authorities, however, say the evictees had been residing illegally and had been compensated, maintaining that they had to be relocated.

“It was entirely illegal because whatever right that they had, it was already compensated in 2003 by the authority,” Dr. Fatima said.