BBC boss interrogated by conservative MPs over Israel-Gaza coverage

During the meeting, Davie was confronted by UK Immigration Minister Robert Jenrick, who said he had “never been so disappointed” in the BBC. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 26 October 2023
Follow

BBC boss interrogated by conservative MPs over Israel-Gaza coverage

  • The meeting focused on the BBC’s coverage of the Israel-Gaza war and migration
  • Broadcaster defends ‘commitment to impartiality’

LONDON: BBC Director-General Tim Davie was interrogated on Thursday by Conservative members of Parliament over the BBC’s coverage of the Israel-Gaza conflict.

During the discussion with the 1922 Committee, Davie was challenged about the BBC’s refusal to label Hamas as “terrorists,” a stance that has drawn criticism from some Conservative MPs and Israeli President Isaac Herzog.

“There’s one thing today that’s united the whole of the backbenches and that’s a disagreement with the DG (director-general) about Hamas being a terrorist organization and the ability to say so,” one MP present at the discussion reported telling the BBC.

During the meeting, Davie was confronted by UK Immigration Minister Robert Jenrick, who said he had “never been so disappointed” in the BBC.

“I worry that the organization has lost the confidence of many people, and in particular the British Jewish community,” Jenrick said. “That loss of confidence began with the BBC’s refusal to call Hamas terrorists. Will you reconsider that and change your editorial policy?”

Davie dismissed the suggestions and upheld the current BBC policy, asserting the importance of maintaining broadcast impartiality.

A spokesperson for the BBC later added that the commitment to neutrality enabled the broadcaster to report from different regions, emphasising that being perceived as an arm of the UK government could undermine the credibility and trustworthiness of its journalism.

The spokesperson said that the BBC periodically reviewed its editorial guidelines, with a comprehensive assessment planned in the coming months.

The meeting was described as part of the routine engagement between the BBC and political parties, scheduled since July.

In a related development, BBC News Chief Executive Deborah Turness published a blog post affirming the BBC’s “commitment to impartiality” in its coverage of the Israel-Gaza conflict.

She said that BBC journalists were adjusting their approach by avoiding the term “militant” as a standard description for Hamas or Hezbollah combatants, though they did not ban such terms entirely.

Turness acknowledged that the BBC sought to uphold its long-standing commitment to impartiality but occasionally made mistakes.

“While we strive to hold true to our 100-year commitment to impartiality, we of course sometimes get it wrong,” she wrote.

“That’s when it’s important to acknowledge where we could have done better, and to learn from any mistakes.”

Since the beginning of the conflict, BBC has faced criticism of biased reporting from both sides.

On Friday, Israel issued a stern warning to the BBC, suggesting that the network might be prohibited from reporting in the country due to its refusal to classify Hamas as a terrorist organization.

Earlier this month, pro-Palestinian activists splattered the BBC’s Broadcasting House in London with red paint to protest the network’s “biased” reporting on events in Israel and Gaza.


Lebanon’s official media scale back Hezbollah coverage after Cabinet ban

Updated 12 March 2026
Follow

Lebanon’s official media scale back Hezbollah coverage after Cabinet ban

  • Information Minister Paul Morcos instructs outlets to comply with government decision
  • Journalists, social media urged to avoid content that could provoke hate speech, incitement

BEIRUT: Lebanon has begun implementing a Cabinet decision taken earlier this month to ban Hezbollah’s security and military activities by scaling back coverage of the group on official media platforms.

The measure, which was described in political circles as a significant and bold step, came after decades during which news about the party and the speeches of its leaders were published verbatim and broadcast live through official media outlets, like the state-run National News Agency, TV station Tele Liban and Radio Lebanon.

“No one is imposing censorship,” an official source told Arab News.

“Rather, there is a commitment to the decisions of the state. It is no longer possible for a speech that attacks the Lebanese government and the state to be published through its official media outlets.”

Information Minister Paul Morcos issued a circular instructing directors of official media outlets to comply with the government’s decision to ban the broadcast of speeches or statements by Hezbollah Secretary-General Sheikh Naim Qassem and statements issued by the group’s armed wing, particularly when they contain criticism of the state.

Morcos also ordered that Hezbollah statements be handled in the same manner as those issued by other political parties, meaning they should not be published verbatim. He further instructed media outlets to avoid using the term “Islamic resistance,” except when it appears directly within Hezbollah statements.

The first manifestations of the decision were Tele Liban’s abstention from live broadcasting a speech by Qassem and a statement made on Tuesday by lawmaker Mohammed Raad, who heads the Hezbollah parliamentary bloc.

The group’s supporters described the move as an attempt “to restrict the resistance, Hezbollah and its leadership in the official media.”

Some argued on social media that preventing the use of terms like “resistance” or “holy warriors (Mujahedin)” and replacing them with expressions such as “Hezbollah” and “fighters” was “aimed at brainwashing and stripping the party of its resistance identity.”

During a Cabinet session on Thursday, Morcos raised the issue of content circulating on social media that incites murder and sectarian strife. This comes against the backdrop of the war that Hezbollah waged from Lebanon against Israel on March 2, without state approval, which led to a sharp division in Lebanese public opinion.

Morcos, who is also Cabinet spokesperson, said after the session that what was being published “exceeds the bounds of freedom of opinion, the press and expression.”

Prime Minister Nawaf Salam considered it to fall under the penal code, specifically regarding crimes that harm national unity, he said, and that “we are against strife in all its forms.”

Morcos also urged journalists, influencers and social media users to remain aware of the sensitivity of the current situation and to avoid content that could provoke strife, hate speech or incitement.

He acknowledged, however, that, according to a legal study, he has no authority over social media, even on media-related matters.

“The Ministry of Information does not exercise a guardianship role and lacks judicial police powers,” he said.

“These authorities rest with the public prosecution offices, which are overseen by the minister of justice and fall within the domain of criminal law and criminal prosecution.”

The ban was agreed during a Cabinet session on March 2, after Hezbollah launched six rockets from Lebanese territory toward northern Israel, the first such attack since the November 2024 ceasefire, prompting retaliatory strikes.

The Cabinet reaffirmed that “the decision of war and peace rests exclusively with the Lebanese state and its constitutional institutions,” and called on Hezbollah to hand over its weapons to the state while limiting its role to political activity within the legal and constitutional framework.