British Medical Journal accuses Israeli forces of ‘deliberate violence’ against health workers in Palestine

Reports of the deaths of 20 health workers in Israeli airstrikes, as well as violence against staff working for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency were also highlighted. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 26 October 2023
Follow

British Medical Journal accuses Israeli forces of ‘deliberate violence’ against health workers in Palestine

  • Editorial claims attacks are part of broader pattern of Israeli violence against health workers
  • Authors call for ‘immediate deescalation’ and adherence to international law

LONDON: Six health academics from around the world have accused Israeli forces of deliberately targeting healthcare workers in Gaza and Palestine.

In an editorial published in BMJ Global Health, a British Medical Journal-owned peer-reviewed publication, the six focused on the deadly blast at Al-Ahli hospital in Gaza, describing it as “one of the most horrific attacks on a healthcare facility in our collective history,” and suggesting the devastation was caused by an airstrike.

The editorial alleged that Israeli forces intentionally target people’s limbs to cause more suffering and death in the occupied territories.

Both Israel and Hamas have denied responsibility for the hospital blast, and the cause remains unclear.

The editorial states: “These most recent, egregious healthcare-related attacks follow a long history of Israeli violence against health workers, the destruction of health infrastructure, the systematic obstruction of access to healthcare, and the implementation of settler-colonial strategies that aim to increase morbidity and mortality in occupied Palestine.”

Reports of the deaths of 20 health workers in Israeli airstrikes, as well as violence against staff working for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency were also highlighted.

The authors claimed recent healthcare-related attacks are part of a broader pattern of Israeli violence against health workers.

These strategies include the destruction of Palestinian healthcare and other essential services; “exerting full control” over water and electricity supplies; and the “deliberate targeting of limbs, leading to traumatic limb loss and disability.”

The authors called for an “immediate deescalation of the threat posed by Israel to the lives of millions of Palestinian people.”

In a follow-up to the editorial, a spokesperson for the BMJ said the journal is making changes to the article, including replacing “airstrike” with “missile strike,” and acknowledging that the origin of the missile is yet to be determined.


Apple, Google offer app store changes under new UK rules

Updated 10 February 2026
Follow

Apple, Google offer app store changes under new UK rules

LONDON: Apple and Google have pledged changes to ensure fairness in their app stores, the UK competition watchdog said Tuesday, describing it as “first steps” under its tougher regulation of technology giants.
The Competition and Markets Authority placed the two companies under “strategic market status” last year, giving it powers to impose stricter rules on their mobile platforms.
Apple and Google have submitted packages of commitments to improve fairness and transparency in their app stores, which the CMA is now consulting market participants on.
The proposals cover data collection, how apps are reviewed and ranked and improved access to their mobile operating systems.
They aim to prevent Apple and Google from giving priority to their own apps and to ensure businesses receive fairer terms for delivering apps to customers, including better access to tools to compete with services like the Apple digital wallet.
“These are important first steps while we continue to work on a broad range of additional measures to improve Apple and Google’s app store services in the UK,” said CMA chief executive Sarah Cardell.
The commitments mark the first changes proposed by US tech giants in response to the UK’s digital markets regulation, which came into force last year.
The UK framework is similar to a tech competition law from the European Union, the Digital Markets Act, which carries the potential for hefty financial penalties.
“The commitments announced today allow Apple to continue advancing important privacy and security innovations for users and great opportunities for developers,” an Apple spokesperson said.
The CMA in October found that Apple and Google held an “effective duopoly,” with around 90 to 100 percent of UK mobile services running on their platforms.
A Google spokesperson said existing practices in its Play online store are “fair, objective and transparent.”
“We welcome the opportunity to resolve the CMA’s concerns collaboratively,” they added.
The changes are set to take effect in April, subject to the outcome of a market consultation.