Fukushima wastewater released into ocean, China bans Japanese seafood

This aerial view shows the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Fukushima, northern Japan, on Aug. 22, 2023. Japan will start releasing treated radioactive water from the wrecked Fukushima nuclear power plant into the Pacific Ocean on Thursday. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 24 August 2023
Follow

Fukushima wastewater released into ocean, China bans Japanese seafood

  • China criticizes action as ‘selfish and irresponsible’
  • Japan requests that China immediately lift its import ban on aquatic products

OKUMA: Japan started releasing treated radioactive water from the wrecked Fukushima nuclear power plant into the Pacific Ocean on Thursday, a polarizing move that prompted China to announce an immediate blanket ban on all aquatic products from Japan.
China is “highly concerned about the risk of radioactive contamination brought by... Japan’s food and agricultural products,” the customs bureau said in a statement.
The Japanese government signed off on the plan two years ago and it was given a green light by the UN nuclear watchdog last month. The discharge is a key step in decommissioning the Fukushima Daiichi plant after it was destroyed by a tsunami in 2011.
Plant operator Tokyo Electric Power (Tepco) said the release began at 1:03 p.m. local time (0403 GMT) and it had not identified any abnormalities.
However, China reiterated its firm opposition to the plan and said the Japanese government had not proved that the water discharged would be safe.
“The Japanese side should not cause secondary harm to the local people and even the people of the world out of its own selfish interests,” its foreign ministry said in a statement.
Tokyo has in turn criticized China for spreading “scientifically unfounded claims.”
It maintains the water release is safe, noting that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has also concluded that the impact it would have on people and the environment was “negligible.”
Japan has requested that China immediately lift its import ban on aquatic products and seeks a discussion on the impact of the water release based on science, Prime Minister Fumio Kishida told reporters.
Japan exported about $600 million worth of aquatic products to China in 2022, making it the biggest market for Japanese exports, with Hong Kong second. Sales to China and Hong Kong accounted for 42 percent of all Japanese aquatic exports in 2022, according to government data.
China customs did not give details on the specific aquatic products impacted by the ban and did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

DECADES LONG PROCESS
The Fukushima Daiichi plant was destroyed in March 2011 after a massive 9.0 magnitude earthquake generated powerful tsunami waves causing meltdowns in three reactors.
The first discharge totalling 7,800 cubic meters — the equivalent of about three Olympic swimming pools of water — will take place over about 17 days.
According to Tepco test results released on Thursday, that water contained about up to 63 becquerels of tritium per liter, below the World Health Organization drinking water limit of 10,000 becquerels per liter. A becquerel is a unit of radioactivity.
The IAEA also released a statement saying its independent on-site analysis had confirmed the tritium concentration was far below the limit.
“There are not going to be any health effects… There is no scientific reason to ban imports of Japanese food whatsoever,” said Geraldine Thomas, former professor of molecular pathology at London’s Imperial College.
But Japanese fishing groups, hit with years of reputational damage from radiation fears, still oppose the plan.
“All we want is to be able to continue fishing,” the head of the Japan Fisheries Co-operative said in a statement that touched on the “mounting anxiety” of the community.
Separately from China, Hong Kong and Macau have announced their own ban starting Thursday, which covers Japanese seafood imports from 10 regions.
South Korean Prime Minister Han Duck-soo said import bans on Fukushima fisheries and food products will stay in place until public concerns were eased.
Japan will conduct monitoring around the water release area and publish results weekly starting on Sunday, Japan’s environment minister said. The release is estimated to take about 30 years.

PROTESTS
In Hong Kong, Jacay Shum, a 73-year-old activist, held up a picture portraying IAEA head Rafael Grossi as the devil.
“Japan’s actions in discharging contaminated water are very irresponsible, illegal, and immoral,” said Shum, who was among a group of about 100 marchers. “No one can prove that the nuclear waste and materials are safe. They are completely unsafe.”
South Korean police arrested at least 16 protesters who entered the Japanese embassy in Seoul, although South Korea’s government has said its own assessment found no problems with the scientific and technical aspects of the release.
North Korea’s foreign ministry demanded that the water discharge be immediately halted, calling it a “crime against humanity,” state media reported.
A few dozen protesters gathered in front of Tepco’s headquarters in Tokyo holding signs reading “Don’t throw contaminated water into the sea!“
“The Fukushima nuclear disaster is not over. This time only around 1 percent of the water will be released,” 71-year-old Jun Iizuka, who attended the protest, told Reuters. “From now on, we will keep fighting for a long time to stop the long-term discharge of contaminated water.”


Analysis: Understanding the illegitimacy of Somaliland independence

Updated 51 min 17 sec ago
Follow

Analysis: Understanding the illegitimacy of Somaliland independence

  • Israel’s recognition of Somaliland has drawn condemnation as a violation of international law and Somalia’s sovereignty
  • Regional and global critics warn the move risks militarizing the Red Sea and destabilizing the Horn of Africa

LONDON: For 34 years, the breakaway state of Somaliland, which declared independence from Somalia in 1991, has wandered in the diplomatic wilderness, its claim to sovereignty unrecognized by the entire world.

All that changed on Dec. 26 with the surprise announcement by the Israeli government that it was establishing full diplomatic relations with the territory, which occupies a strategically sensitive position along the northern coast of the Horn of Africa, overlooking the Gulf of Aden and the mouth of the Red Sea.

On Dec. 28, Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar, took to Facebook to publish the declaration of recognition, signed by himself and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The recognition, it read, had been made “in light of the shared values, strategic interests, and the spirit of mutual respect that binds our people.”



The relationship, it added, “will contribute to advancing peace, stability, and prosperity in the Horn of Africa, the Middle East, and beyond.”

But for the many international critics of the move, including Turkiye, Saudi Arabia, the EU, the UK, China and the African Union, the Israeli recognition of Somaliland’s sovereignty is likely to only increase tensions in an already turbulent region.

Somalia’s President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud has claimed that, as the price for Israel’s recognition, Somaliland has agreed to accept Palestinians displaced from Gaza by Israel. The Somaliland regime has denied this, but pro-Palestinian states are not convinced.

On Dec. 27, Saudi Arabia was among 21 Arab, Islamic and African nations that issued a joint statement declaring their “unequivocal rejection of Israel’s recognition of the ‘Somaliland’ region of the Federal Republic of Somalia.”

They rejected “any potential link between such a measure and any attempts to forcibly expel the Palestinian people out of their land, which is unequivocally rejected in any form as a matter of principle.”

Israel’s recognition of Somaliland, they added, constituted “a grave violation of the principles of international law and the UN Charter, which explicitly stipulates the imperative of protecting the sovereignty of states and their territorial integrity.”

There would, they added, be “serious repercussions of such an unprecedented measure on peace and security in the Horn of Africa, the Red Sea, and … serious effects on international peace and security as a whole.”

Much of the rest of the world, including Europe, is in lockstep with the Arab states on the issue.



On Dec. 26, the EU issued a statement in which it “reaffirms the importance of respecting the unity, the sovereignty and the territorial integrity of the Federal Republic of Somalia pursuant of its constitution, the Charters of the African Union and the UN.”

It added: “This is key for the peace and stability of the entire Horn of Africa region.”

China, too, has criticized the Israeli move. In a statement, the Foreign Ministry said that “no country should encourage or support other countries’ internal separatist forces for its own selfish interests.”

At a meeting of the UN Security Council on Dec. 29, Khaled Khiari, assistant secretary-general for the Middle East, Asia and the Pacific, relayed Somalia’s indignation at what it called “a deliberate attack” on its sovereignty.

Khiari said Somalia had “also underscored that it would not permit the establishment of any foreign military bases or arrangements that would draw the country into proxy conflicts.”

Somalia declared that “no external actor has the authority” to alter its territorial configuration.



The UK was among numerous countries that spoke up for Somalia, with its charge d’affaires reaffirming his country’s continuing “support for the sovereignty, territorial integrity, political independence, and unity of Somalia.”

The UK, added Ambassador James Kariuki, “does not recognize Somaliland’s independence.

“We maintain that any change to Somaliland’s status depends on mutual agreement between Mogadishu and Hargeisa, through dialogue, and must conform to the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.”

Israel’s Sa’ar, who visited Somaliland on Tuesday, brushed aside the chorus of criticism. “Somaliland was not created this past weekend,” he wrote on Facebook. “It has existed as a functioning state for more than 34 years.

“The attacks on Israel’s recognition of Somaliland are hypocritical. Only Israel will decide who to recognize and with whom to maintain diplomatic relations.”

Netanyahu, meanwhile, has said he only wants to “support a democratic, moderate country, a Muslim country, that wants to join the Abraham Accords.”



But some observers believe Israel may be planning to use Somaliland as a military base from which to attack the Houthis in Yemen. Since 2023, the Houthis have launched several missile attacks on Israel, and Israel has struck many targets in Yemen in response.

Now the Houthis have warned that any Israeli military presence in Somaliland would be considered a target, which puts Somalis in the firing line of a war that has nothing to do with them.

Israel’s act of recognition appears likely to stoke tensions in the region.

For example, relations between Somalia and Ethiopia, its western neighbor, are already fraught following talks between Somaliland and Addis Ababa aimed at giving the landlocked state access to the Red Sea.

Ethiopia lost its own coastline in 1993 when its northern region of Eritrea declared independence.

The plan to give Ethiopia a naval base on Somaliland’s Red Sea coast is bitterly opposed by Somalia, which resents what it sees as its territory being given away.

It has also angered Egypt. Cairo has its own dispute with Ethiopia over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, which the country has built on the Blue Nile and which Egypt says is threatening its water supplies.

The region’s current crisis is rooted in colonialism.



Before the European “scramble for Africa,” there was no central “Somalian” state. Instead, a region roughly equivalent to modern-day Somaliland, Somalia, Djibouti, the eastern Ogaden region of Ethiopia and parts of northern Kenya was occupied by scattered groups of Somali-speaking pastoral tribes.

In the 19th century, European powers divided up the area into French Somaliland (Djibouti) in the extreme northwest, British Somaliland (today’s Somaliland), and Italian Somaliland (now Somalia).

The British and Italian-held territories gained their independence in 1960 and came together briefly as the Somali Republic. The union proved fragile, however, and in 1969 ended with the assassination of President Abdirashid Ali Sharmarke and a subsequent military coup.

The leader of the coup was Mohamed Siad Barre, the commander of the army, who declared himself president.

In 1991, widespread anger at the regime escalated into civil war. Barre fled to Kenya (reportedly in a tank loaded with millions of dollars of the state’s money), and the government collapsed.

This was the moment, in May 1991, that political leaders in the former British Somaliland declared independence as the Republic of Somaliland, an entity that until now had received no international recognition.

Abdirahman Sahal Yusuf, former media adviser to the Office of the Prime Minister of Somalia and editor of the Qiraat Somali online news platform, says it is clear that “Israel has no right to recognize Somaliland. It is a move that violates international law.”



In doing so, he told Arab News, he believes Israel has two strategic goals: “Establishing a military base in this region to confront the Houthis, but at the same time there is an agreement to transfer Palestinians to Somaliland, which is a red line.”

Establishing an Israeli military base in Somaliland, he said, “would pose a threat to the national security of Egypt and Saudi Arabia, since this region is very sensitive.

“Israel wants to move its battles to this region, ruining Arab national security and dividing countries. The unity of Somalia must be protected.”

For Abdihakim Kalale, an Ethiopian political and security analyst, “the core issue is not recognition itself. States recognize one another, exchange interests, and recalibrate alliances as part of normal international politics.

“The problem lies in how Israel recognized Somaliland and the assumptions that informed that decision.”

Israel, he told Arab News, “appears to have treated Somaliland as a single, unified separatist movement. In reality, it is neither politically nor socially homogeneous. Fragmentation exists, not only in the east, but also in the west.”

In western Somaliland, two major clans inhabiting territories that represent roughly 15-20 percent of the claimed area have not fully integrated into the Somaliland system.

“These groups are actively pursuing the creation of a separate federal member state aligned with Mogadishu rather than Hargeisa. This alone demonstrates that Somaliland lacks internal political cohesion.”



In the east, the situation is even more fragmented. Here, following clan-based fighting in 2023, “a new federal member state, the Northeastern State of Somalia, emerged from territories internationally referred to as Somaliland.

“This entity is now aligned with Mogadishu and exercises effective control over large areas where the Somaliland government has no presence. These eastern territories account for approximately 40 to 45 percent of the land Somaliland claims.”

Furthermore, he said: “Somaliland is neither institutionally nor socially prepared to be integrated into larger geopolitical frameworks such as the Abraham Accords,” which Netanyahu has suggested is on the cards.

“Israel engaged with a leadership eager for recognition but lacking the capacity to manage the profound internal and regional consequences that recognition entails. This creates a governance vacuum that radical and violent actors are well positioned to exploit.

“There is a real risk that this decision could accelerate radicalization and a region long regarded as relatively stable compared to southern Somalia could, in the coming years, evolve into a new security hotspot.”

Liban Abd Ali, a consultant and former media and communications director in the Office of the Prime Minister of Somalia, agrees that Israeli recognition of the breakaway territory is “a very bad move.

“It’s a violation of a sovereign state and a violation of international laws and norms, and Israel is going to divide Somalia’s territorial integrity, fuel conflicts and destroy domestic cohesion,” he told Arab News.



He believes “the main objective is to forcibly move over 1.5 million Palestinians from their own land to northern Somalia.

“They also want to use this area as a launchpad for their fight against the Houthis in Yemen, and beyond that to control the Gulf of Aden and the Red Sea. Israel’s main goal is to destabilize the region by dividing countries.”