Soda sweetener aspartame now listed as possible cancer cause. But it’s still considered safe

Sodas on shelves at a Vons grocery store in Pasadena, California, U.S., June 10, 2020. (REUTERS/File)
Short Url
Updated 14 July 2023
Follow

Soda sweetener aspartame now listed as possible cancer cause. But it’s still considered safe

  • Aspartame is low-calorie artificial sweetener that is about 200 times sweeter than sugar
  • The sweetener joins a category with more than 300 other possible cancer-causing agents

The World Health Organization's cancer agency has deemed the sweetener aspartame — found in diet soda and countless other foods — as a “possible” cause of cancer, while a separate expert group looking at the same evidence said it still considers the sugar substitute safe in limited quantities.

The differing results of the coordinated reviews were released early Friday. One came from the International Agency for Research on Cancer, a special branch of the WHO. The other report was from an expert panel selected by WHO and another UN group, the Food and Agriculture Organization.
The Lyon, France-based cancer agency periodically reviews potential cancer hazards, but doesn't determine how likely they are to cause cancer in their evaluations which range from “possibly” carcinogenic to “probably” to cancer-causing.
Aspartame joins a category with more than 300 other possible cancer-causing agents, including things like aloe vera extract, Asian-style pickled vegetables and carpentry work.
The guidance on use of the sweetener, though, isn’t changing.
“We’re not advising consumers to stop consuming (aspartame) altogether,” said WHO’s nutrition director Dr. Francesco Branca. “We’re just advising a bit of moderation.”
Here's a look at the announcement:
What is aspartame?
Aspartame is a low-calorie artificial sweetener that is about 200 times sweeter than sugar. It is a white, odorless powder and the world’s most widely used artificial sweetener.
Aspartame is authorized as a food additive in Europe and the US and is used in numerous foods, drinks such as Diet Coke, desserts, chewing gum, medications including cough drops and foods intended to help with weight loss. It's in tabletop sweeteners sold as Equal, Sugar Twin and NutraSweet.
Aspartame was approved in 1974 by the US Food and Drug Administration with an acceptable daily intake of 50 milligrams per kilogram of body weight. According to the FDA, a person weighing 132 pounds (60 kilograms) would need to consume about 75 aspartame packets to reach that level.
UN.experts evaluated the safety of aspartame in 1981 and set the safe daily limit slightly lower, at 40 milligrams of aspartame per kilogram.
David Spiegelhalter, an emeritus statistics professor at Cambridge University, said the guidance means that “average people are safe to drink up to 14 cans of diet drink a day … and even this ‘acceptable daily limit’ has a large built-in safety factor.”
What did the two groups say?
WHO's cancer agency, IARC, convened its expert group in June to assess the potential of aspartame to cause cancer. It based its conclusion that aspartame is “possibly carcinogenic” on studies in humans and animals that found “limited” evidence that the compound may be linked to liver cancer.
In a separate evaluation, experts assembled by WHO and the food agency updated their risk assessment, including reviewing the acceptable daily intake. They concluded there was “no convincing evidence” at the currently consumed levels that aspartame is dangerous; their guidelines regarding acceptable levels of consumption were unchanged.
The move comes weeks after the WHO said that non-sugar sweeteners don't help with weight loss and could lead to increased risk of diabetes, heart disease and early death in adults.
Should I be concerned about getting too much?
Not as long as you don’t exceed the guidelines. The FDA said scientific evidence continues to support the agency's conclusion that aspartame is “safe for the general population,” when used within limits.
Almost any substance can be dangerous in excessive amounts, said David Klurfeld, a nutrition expert at the Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington.
“The dose makes the poison,” said Klurfeld, who previously served on an IARC panel. “Even essential nutrients like vitamin A, iron and water will kill you within hours if too much is consumed.”
So what should consumers do?
WHO’s Branca said it was acceptable for people to consume a “pretty large” amount of aspartame without suffering any ill effects. “High consumers" might want to cut back, he said.
Dr. Peter Lurie, executive director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, which previously nominated aspartame for IARC review, said there’s an easy choice for consumers.
“At least when it comes to beverages, our message is your best choice is to drink water or an unsweetened beverage,” he said.
Most people, though, probably don’t pay much attention to IARC evaluations. The agency has previously classified processed meat like hot dogs and bacon as cancer-causing, noting in particular its link to colon cancer. That move surprised even others in the scientific community — the U.K.’s biggest cancer charity reassured Britons that eating a bacon sandwich every so often wouldn’t do them much harm.
What does this mean for the food and beverage industry?
Food and beverage producers say there’s no reason to avoid products with aspartame.
“There is a broad consensus in the scientific and regulatory community that aspartame is safe," the American Beverage Association said in a statement.
WHO's Branca said the agency advises food manufacturers in general to “use ingredients that do not require the addition of too much sugar.” After the latest assessments of aspartame, Branca said.


Sheikha Al-Mayassa talks cultural patronage at Art Basel Qatar Conversations panel

Updated 04 February 2026
Follow

Sheikha Al-Mayassa talks cultural patronage at Art Basel Qatar Conversations panel

DOHA: Cultural leaders at the inaugural edition of Art Basel Qatar in Doha have discussed how patronage is reshaping art ecosystems, with Qatar’s own long-term cultural vision at the center.

The opening panel, “Leaders of Change: How is patronage shaping new art ecosystems?” brought together Sheikha Al-Mayassa bint Hamad bin Khalifa Al-Thani, chair of Qatar Museums, and Maja Hoffmann, founder and president of the Luma Foundation, in a discussion moderated by Hans Ulrich Obrist, artistic director of the Serpentine Galleries in London. The talk formed part of the Art Basel Conversations x Qatar Creates Talks program, coinciding with the debut of Art Basel Qatar which runs in Doha until Feb. 8.

Sheikha Al-Thani framed Qatar’s cultural project as a strategic, long-term endeavor anchored in national development. “Qatar has a national vision called 2030 where culture was one of the main pillars for socioeconomic development and human development,” she said. “We have always invested in culture as a means of human development.”

That vision, she explained, underpins the decision to welcome a major international fair like Art Basel to Doha after turning away many previous proposals.

“For the longest time, I can’t tell you how many art fairs came to us wanting to be here, and we never felt it was the right time,” she said. “However, this is an important year for us and we felt, with the surplus of talent and the growing gallery scene we had here, that it was time to bring industry to talent, because that’s how we will spur the economic diversification from hydrocarbon to a knowledge-based society.”

She was also keen to stress that Art Basel Qatar was not conceived as a conventional marketplace.

 “This is not your typical art fair … It’s a humane art fair where engagement is more important than transaction, discourse more important than division, and curiosity more important than conviction,” she added.

That ethos extends to the fair’s artistic leadership. Al-Thani described how the decision to have an artist — Wael Shawky — serve as artistic director emerged collaboratively with Art Basel’s team.

“He’s a global artist who’s now become a very local artist, very invested in our local art scene. And really, I think that’s the beauty of partnerships … There is a safe space for us to critique each other, support each other, and really brainstorm all the possibilities … and then come to a consensus of what would make sense for us,” she said.

Collecting art, she added, has long been embedded in Qatari society: “My grandmother is almost 100 years old. She was collecting in the 60s when Qatar was a very poor country. It’s in our DNA … always with this notion of investing in knowledge and human development.”

Today, that impulse translates into comprehensive, multi-disciplinary collections: “We are both collecting historical objects, contemporary objects, modern objects, architecture, archival material, anything that we feel is relevant to us and the evolution of this nation towards a knowledge-based economy.”

Looking ahead, Al-Thani outlined a new cultural triangle in Doha — the National Museum of Qatar, the Museum of Islamic Art and the forthcoming Art Mill Museum — as engines for both economic diversification and intellectual life.

 “That ecosystem will enhance the economic growth and diversification, but also the knowledge that’s available, because the diversity in the collections between these three institutions will no doubt inspire young people, amateurs, entrepreneurs to think outside the box and inform their next business,” she said.

The panel closed with a focus on the future of large-scale exhibitions with Rubaiya, Qatar’s new quadrennial, timed to coincide with the anniversary of the 2022 World Cup.

“Every four years in memory of the opening of the World Cup, we will open the quadrennial. This year, the theme is ‘Unruly Waters.’ At the center of the theme is Qatar’s trading route to the Silk Road,” explained Al-Thani.

“It’s important for us to trace our past and claim it and share it to the rest of the world, but also show the connectivity that Qatar had historically and the important role it has been playing in diplomacy.”