Burning of Qur’an torpedoes Sweden’s NATO bid

Salwan Momika protests outside a mosque in Stockholm on June 28, 2023, during the Eid Al-Adha holiday. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 06 July 2023
Follow

Burning of Qur’an torpedoes Sweden’s NATO bid

  • Ankara has demanded a Swedish crackdown on Kurdish movements, such as the the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), which it says is a terrorist group
  • Erdogan has continued to criticize Stockholm, and a protest last week that saw pages of the Qur'an burnt further stoked his ire

JEDDAH: Sweden failed on Thursday to convince Turkiye to lift its block on Stockholm’s membership of NATO in talks blighted by last week’s desecration and burning of the Qur’an in the Swedish capital.

Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan was furious with the Swedish government for allowing the “protest” outside the Stockholm central mosque to go ahead. “Those who permitted the crime” were as much to blame as the perpetrator, he said, and NATO membership was out of the question until Qur’an burning ceased.

Turkiye already opposes Sweden’s NATO membership because of its alleged harboring of PKK militants from the Kurdistan Workers Party.

Sweden says it has fulfilled the demands agreed on in negotiations with Turkiye, including the introduction of a bill that makes being a member of a terrorist organization illegal. The government is also looking at whether it could criminalize setting any holy book on fire. Such actions are currently protected by Sweden’s far-reaching laws on freedom of expression.

“We have to ask ourselves whether the current order is good or whether there is reason to reconsider it,” Justice Minister Gunnar Strommer said on Thursday. “We can see that the Qur’an burning last week has generated threats to our internal security.”

Talks on Sweden’s NATO membership will continue on Monday before a NATO summit in Vilnius, Lithania. “We are hoping and looking for a positive decision,” Swedish Foreign Minister Tobias Billstrom said.


Mistrial declared in the case of Stanford students charged after pro-Palestinian protests in 2024

Updated 6 sec ago
Follow

Mistrial declared in the case of Stanford students charged after pro-Palestinian protests in 2024

SAN FRANCISCO, US: A judge declared a mistrial Friday in the case of five current and former Stanford University students charged after pro-Palestinian protests in 2024, when they barricaded themselves inside the university president and provost executive offices.
The trial in Santa Clara County was a rare instance of demonstrators facing felony charges from protests over the Israel-Hamas war that roiled campuses across the country. The two sides argued over free speech, lawful dissent and crime during the three-week proceedings.
The jury voted 9 to 3 to convict on a felony charge of vandalism and 8 to 4 to convict on a felony charge of conspiracy to trespass. After deliberating for five days, jurors said they could not reach a verdict.
Judge Hanley Chew asked each one if more time deliberating would help break the impasse, and all answered, “No.”
“It appears that this jury is hopelessly deadlocked, and I’m now declaring a mistrial in counts one and two,” Chen said. He then dismissed the jurors.
Demonstrators barricaded themselves inside the offices for several hours on June 5, 2024, the last day of spring classes at the university.
Prosecutors said the defendants spray-painted the building, broke windows and furniture, disabled security cameras and splattered a red liquid described as fake blood on items throughout the offices.
Defense attorneys said the protest was protected speech and there was insufficient evidence of an intent to damage the property. They also said the students wore protective gear and barricaded the offices out of fear of being injured by police and campus security.
If convicted, the defendants would have faced up to three years in prison and been obligated to pay restitution of over $300,000.
Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen said he would pursue a new trial.
“This case is about a group of people who destroyed someone else’s property and caused hundreds of thousands of dollars in damage,” Rosen said in a statement. “That is against the law and that is why we will retry the case.”
As the mistrial was announced, the students, some wearing kaffiyehs, sat on a bench in the courtroom and did not show a visible reaction.
“The District Attorney’s Office had Stanford University supporting them and other multibillion-dollar institutions behind them, and even then the district attorney was unable to convict us,” Germán González, who was a sophomore at Stanford when he was arrested, told The Associated Press by phone later. “No matter what happens, we will continue to fight tooth and nail for as long as possible, because at the end of the day, this is for Palestine.”
Authorities initially arrested and charged 12 people in the case, but one pleaded no contest under an agreement that allows some young people to have their cases dismissed and records sealed if they successfully complete probation.
He testified for the prosecution, leading to a grand jury indictment of the others in October of the others. Six of those accepted pretrial plea deals or diversion programs, and the remaining five pleaded not guilty and sought a jury trial.
Protests sprung up on campuses across the country over the Israel-Hamas conflict, with students setting up camps and demanding their universities stop doing business with Israel or companies that support its war efforts against Hamas.
About 3,200 people were arrested in 2024 nationwide. While some colleges ended demonstrations by striking deals with students or simply waited them out, others called in police. Most criminal charges were ultimately dismissed.