Islamabad court rejects ex-PM Khan’s plea seeking suspension of non-bailable arrest warrants

In this photo, taken on February 28, 2023, Pakistan's former Prime Minister Imran Khan (C) leaves after appearing at the court in Islamabad. (Photo courtesy: AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 06 March 2023
Follow

Islamabad court rejects ex-PM Khan’s plea seeking suspension of non-bailable arrest warrants

  • The same court last week issued Khan’s warrants over his absence in case involving sale of state gifts
  • On Sunday, Khan evaded arrest after his supporters barred a police team from entering his residence

ISLAMABAD: An Islamabad district and sessions court on Monday rejected former prime minister Imran Khan’s plea seeking suspension of non-bailable arrest warrants issued for him, local media reported, a day after the ex-premier evaded arrest following hours of drama in the eastern city of Lahore.

The same court had on Feb 28 issued the non-bailable arrest warrants for Khan over his repeated absence in a case involving the sale of gifts Khan received as the prime minister, which has come to be popularly known as the Toshakhana (state repository) reference.

On Monday, Additional Sessions Judge Zafar Iqbal announced the already reserved verdict after hearing arguments by Khan’s attorneys on his plea seeking cancelation of his warrants, Pakistan’s Geo News channel reported.

“The PTI (Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf) chief could have approached the Islamabad High Court for the suspension of the warrant,” the judge was quoted as saying before announcing the verdict.

On Sunday, an Islamabad police team reached Khan’s residence in Lahore with the court summons. The team, however, returned empty-handed when the situation got tensed after the ex-premier’s supporters blocked its entry to his home.

In a landmark ruling in October last year, Pakistan’s election watchdog had disqualified Khan from holding a public office over his failure to declare proceeds from the sale of state gifts in his statement of assets filed with the regulator.

Khan’s party maintains that it is not “humanly possible” for the ex-premier to simultaneously appear in all 74 cases registered against him, including the ones on charges of prohibited funding, terrorism and attempted murder.

“The government wants to provoke PTI workers, create law and order situation” to avoid going to elections as per a recent ruling of the Supreme Court, Chaudhry Fawad Hussain, a close Khan aide, told reporters in Lahore on Sunday.

After weeks of tug of war between the government and the opposition PTI party, the apex court decided to intervene in the matter and asked the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) to propose dates for elections in the Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) provinces.

Khan’s PTI party and allies dissolved the Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa provincial assemblies in January, in a bid to force the government of PM Shehbaz Sharif to announce nationwide polls. The two provinces account for more than half of the country’s 220 million population.

Khan’s PTI has been gambling on the Sharif government being unable to afford to hold the provincial elections separately from the nationwide election, which is otherwise due by October.  

Under the Pakistani law, fresh polls for the two provincial assemblies should be held within 90 days of their dissolution.


‘Fully stand with Bangladesh’: Pakistan PM backs decision to boycott India match

Updated 7 sec ago
Follow

‘Fully stand with Bangladesh’: Pakistan PM backs decision to boycott India match

  • Pakistan’s government have not allowed the national cricket team to play its World Cup match against India on Feb. 15
  • Pakistan has accused India of influencing ICC decisions, criticized global cricket body for replacing Bangladesh in World Cup

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Wednesday backed his government’s decision to bar the national men’s cricket team from playing against India in the upcoming T20 World Cup tournament, reaffirming support for Bangladesh. 

Pakistan’s government announced on social media platform X last week that it has allowed its national team to travel to Sri Lanka for the World Cup. However, it said the Green Shirts will not take the field against India on their scheduled match on Feb. 15. 

Pakistan’s participation in the tournament was thrown into doubt after Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) Chairman Mohsin Naqvi criticized the International Cricket Council (ICC) for replacing Bangladesh with Scotland. The decision was taken after Bangladesh said it would not let its team travel to India out of security concerns. 

During a meeting of the federal cabinet, Sharif highlighted that Pakistan has said that politics should be kept away from sports. 

“We have taken this stand after careful consideration and in this regard, we should stand fully with Bangladesh,” Sharif said in televised remarks. 

“And I believe this is a very reasonable decision.”

Pakistan has blamed India for influencing the ICC’s decisions. The global cricket governing body is currently led by Jay Shah, the head of the Board of Control for Cricket in India. Shah is the son of Indian Home Minister Amit Shah. 

Pakistan’s boycott announcement has triggered media frenzy worldwide, with several Indian cricket experts and analysts criticizing Islamabad for the decision. An India-Pakistan cricket contest is by far the most lucrative and eagerly watched match of any ICC tournament. 

The ICC has ensured that the two rivals and Asian cricket giants are always in the same group of any ICC event since 2012 to capitalize on the high-stakes game. 

The two teams have played each other at neutral venues over the past several years, as bilateral cricket remains suspended between them since 2013 due to political tensions. 

Those tensions have persisted since the two nuclear-armed nations engaged in the worst fighting between them since 1999 in May 2025, after India blamed Pakistan for an attack in Indian-administered Kashmir that killed tourists. 

Pakistan denied India’s allegations that it was involved in the attack, calling for a credible probe into the incident.