Experts see reunion of MQM factions in Pakistan's Sindh as 'merger of fear'

Senior members of splinter groups of the erstwhile Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) party speak during a press conference in Karachi on January 12, 2023. (Photo courtesy: social media)
Short Url
Updated 13 January 2023
Follow

Experts see reunion of MQM factions in Pakistan's Sindh as 'merger of fear'

  • Farooq Sattar-led faction and the Pak Sarzameen Party on Tuesday announced merging into MQM-Pakistan
  • Analysts, ex-member say these factions came together, fearing for their ‘political survival’ in next elections

KARACHI: Experts on Friday called reunification of splinter groups of the erstwhile Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) party a "merger of fear," days after the Pak Sarzameen Party and the Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan (MQM-P) factions came together following a significant drop in their votes in the last few elections. 

Founded by Altaf Hussain in 1984, the MQM had won the hearts of the urban, middle-class people in the southern Pakistani port city of Karachi and secured nine out of 11 National Assembly seats in the seaside metropolis in the 1988 general polls, in which the party had fielded its candidates as independents. The party grew in the southern Sindh province and performed exceptionally well in four out of five elections until 2013 and claimed at one point to have "80 percent" public mandate in Karachi — a bustling megapolis of more than 15 million people and the commercial hub of Pakistan. 

But the coming years were the toughest for the party, often accused of resorting to violence to suppress opposition and involvement in crime, after its self-exiled supremo, Hussain, delivered a controversial speech against the country in August 2016, having been frustrated over a loss of votes to former premier Imran Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party and a targeted operation in the city against militants.  

The speech forced colleagues and supporters of Hussain, who has been living in London since the 1990s, to distance themselves and the party from him. Dr. Farooq Sattar, one of the top MQM figures, saved the party by disowning Hussain and having it registered under his name as MQM-Pakistan. But Sattar's differences with another senior member, Aamir Khan, led to a split in the party and the formation the PIB and Bahadurabad factions. Sattar was eventually expelled from the MQM-P, which is controlled by the Bahadurabad faction. 

Months before Hussain’s speech, former Karachi mayor Mustafa Kamal along with Anees Qaimkhani, a former MQM member who is considered an expert on organizational matters, launched their own faction of the MQM, the Pak Sarzameen Party (PSP). While the MQM-P won 6 six out 21 seats in Karachi in the 2018 elections after losing majority of seats to Khan's PTI, the PSP failed miserably in the polls as it lacked public support.  

On Tuesday, both Sattar and PSP's Kamal announced merging their respective groups in the MQM-P, which currently holds most of the electoral seats. However, experts and former party members don’t expect any major impact of the reunion on Karachi's politics.  

“It is a merger of fear rather than hope,” Raza Haroon, a former provincial minister and an ex-member of the MQM and PSP, told Arab News. 

“These groups have been unable to engage and mobilize the people of urban centers of Sindh, while it’s also reality that the electorate of the original [MQM] wasn’t happy with the divisions and the unceremonious removal of the founder.”  

Haroon said there were multiple factors behind the "fear for survival" of these groups and a successful merger was dependent on the intent of each group. 

“There has been a reduction in the vote bank of Urdu-speaking communities, while these groups were also facing pressure and boycott appeals from London,” Haroon said.  

"In addition to this, their leadership has also remained disillusioned when it came to the narrative for the city." 

The London-based MQM supremo, who still enjoys some public support within the urban centers of Sindh, has often urged supporters to boycott breakaway MQM factions in elections and, according to Haroon, the repeated defeats pushed these factions to merge with each other.  

Mazhar Abbas, a senior political analyst, said the merger of MQM factions was being seen with “suspicious eyes” and its future depended on how they moved forward while overcoming their differences.  

“It’s believed that some people within the establishment, if not the whole establishment, were behind this merger,” Abbas told Arab News. 

“It also depends on how active the Altaf group remains. The future of this [new] group will become clear in the 2023 general elections. These are big names and can become successful, but there are many challenges.” 

Abbas said the political strategy and performance of the ruling Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) and the PTI in urban areas of Sindh, which Karachi is the provincial capital of, will also decide the fate of the merged MQM factions.  

“They are also under pressure to not adopt the organizational structure of the original MQM, which had units, sectors, organizational committees and a coordination committee,” Abbas said. 

"They have been given the message that this old structure is not acceptable."  

The analyst said the new group may have an ad hoc setup immediately. “But the biggest test is that if this party runs by itself or is run,” he added, hinting at the military establishment.  

Pakistan's powerful army has ruled the South Asian country for nearly half of its 75-year history, and even when not in power, it is seen as the invisible guiding hand in the country's politics.  

Abdul Jabbar Nasir, a political commentator and journalist closely covering electoral politics in the Sindh province, said there were multiple factors that forced these factions of the MQM to come together for a "political survival." 

“The rise in support for Altaf Hussain, his successful boycott calls during the last few by-elections, delimitation by the PPP-led Sindh government, presence of strong support of the PTI and the JI gaining its lost ground are the reasons,” he told Arab News.  

Nasir said these factors, coupled with the "external pressure," pushed them to become a single political force. 

“But the question that if this merger will help them get the required results depends on if they are able to make a strong organization, which again is a challenge,” he added. 


Pakistan’s army chief to get expanded powers under proposed reform

Updated 6 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan’s army chief to get expanded powers under proposed reform

  • Asim Munir, President Trump’s ‘favorite field marshal,’ to be head of all military forces, a new position
  • Constitutional cases to be taken away from Supreme Court, opposition raps changes as undemocratic

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s powerful army chief will be given an expanded role and the remit of the Supreme Court will be curbed under constitutional changes passed by the upper house of parliament this week, a move the opposition says will undermine democracy.

Pakistan, historically coup-prone, is seeing its longest period of elected government. But in recent years, after civilians have sought to assert more authority in governance, the military has taken tighter hold of the levers of power, while not staging an outright takeover.

The bill, passed on Monday by the Senate in about three hours, unusually fast for a constitutional change, after the opposition boycotted the debate, is now before the lower house before it can become law.

Army chief Asim Munir, described by US President Donald Trump as his “favorite Field Marshal,” would take overall command of the military — including air and naval forces — with the new position of Chief of Defense Forces under the proposed amendment. After completion of his term, he would retain his rank and have legal immunity for life.

While the military has long wielded extensive power, the reforms would give it greater constitutional backing that would not be easily reversed. Hitherto the army chief was the equal of the air force and navy chiefs, with a chairman of the joint chiefs sitting above him, a post that would be eliminated.

Constitutional cases would no longer be heard by the Supreme Court but by a new Federal Constitutional Court, with judges appointed by the government. In recent years, the Supreme Court has, at times, blocked government policies and ousted prime ministers.

Critics say handpicked judges would now hear the most politically sensitive cases impacting the government, with the Supreme Court dealing with civil and criminal matters.

Under the reforms, President Asif Zardari would also get immunity for life from prosecution.

“All these amendments are for governance, and the federal government’s coordination with the provinces, and to strengthen defense capability after winning a war,” Information Minister Attaullah Tarar said, referring to clashes with India in May.

The government said it was confident it had the numbers in parliament to approve the constitutional changes, which were unusually introduced to the Senate over the weekend. A two-thirds majority is required in the two houses that make up the parliament, the Senate and National Assembly.

The biggest opposition party, founded by jailed ex-prime minister Imran Khan, said it was not consulted. After a noisy protest, opposition parties walked out on Monday when the amendment was introduced to the Senate floor for debate.

Khan’s party PTI condemned the proposed changes.

“The amendment serves as a tool for the ruling coalition to bulldoze institutional checks and balances, silence the opposition, restrict fundamental rights, and concentrate power in its own hands,” PTI’s spokesman for international media, Zulfi Bukhari, told Reuters.

Munir was promoted from General to Field Marshal after the May conflict with India. Law Minister Azam Tarar said on Saturday the rank would be given constitutional protection “because he is the hero of the whole nation.”

The military did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Security officials said the changing nature of modern war, where land troops do not necessarily play the paramount role, requires unified command of all the armed forces.

The government says the court reforms are necessary because hearing constitutional cases takes up too much of the Supreme Court’s time, creating a case backlog.