Pakistani women politicians, activists condemn ‘shocking’ death of Iran’s Mahsa Amini

Women hold up signs depicting the image of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini, who died while in the custody of Iranian authorities, during a demonstration denouncing her death outside the UN offices in Arbil on September 24, 2022. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 24 September 2022

Pakistani women politicians, activists condemn ‘shocking’ death of Iran’s Mahsa Amini

  • Mahsa Amini, 22, died a few days after being detained by Iran’s so-called morality police
  • At least 30 have been killed in widespread protests across Iran in aftermath of Amini’s death

KARACHI: Pakistan’s prominent women politicians and rights activists on Saturday condemned the death of Iranian woman Mahsa Amini, who died after being detained by Iran’s so-called morality police for disobeying the country’s strict dress code.  

Widespread protests across Iran have resulted in 35 people getting killed over the past week, according to Iranian state media, as enraged citizens allege Amini, 22, died due to police brutality.  

Amini was arrested in Tehran on September 13 for not wearing a headscarf by Iran’s morality police. She shortly collapsed at a detention center and was admitted to a coma.  

On September 16, Amini passed away, triggering widespread protests and acts of defiance against the Iranian state. In several clips that have now gone viral on social media, women can be seen cutting their hair publicly and burning headscarves, an open challenge to Iranian authorities.  

In Iran, women are required to follow a strict dress code which includes wearing a headscarf over their heads and putting on long, loose-fitting clothes to disguise their figures. The laws are based on Iran’s interpretation of Islamic law.  

Protestors are demanding an end to what they say is police brutality, moral policing and are calling for women to determine their right to choose to dress as they please. The Gasht-e Ershad (Guidance Patrols) is a special police unit in Iran tasked with enforcing the laws on Islamic dress code in public. 

Pakistani women politicians reacted to the incident, demanding more freedom for women in Iran and calling for an impartial investigation into Amini’s death.  

“It’s really sad and if what is being reported is true, it's a shocking and blatant violation of fundamental rights,” Shazia Marri, Pakistan’s federal minister for poverty alleviation, told Arab News on Saturday.  

Iranian police said Amini passed away due to a heart attack. It denied reports officers beat her head with a baton and banged Amini’s head against one of their vehicles.  

“It’s a complete travesty of justice and highly condemnable. Everyone must have a right to choose,” Marri added.  

Sharmila Sahibah Faruqui, a lawmaker of Pakistan’s provincial Sindh Assembly, said state brutality cannot be normalized in any country.  

“It is heartbreaking to see how Mahsa Amini was brutally killed by law enforcement authorities for not wearing a hijab,” she said, speaking to Arab News.   

“The voices of women must not be oppressed by the state. Women, who have been trying to break the glass ceiling, must be empowered, not silenced by state authorities,” Faruqui added.  

Sehar Kamran, a former Pakistani senator, told Arab News that Islam ensures and protects the rights of women by guaranteeing their dignity and honour.  

“Iran must ensure that a few individuals do not smear the name of law and Islam, and should bring the culprits to justice,” Kamran said. “The onus lies upon the Iranian authorities to ensure justice so that such events do not occur in the future,” she added.  

Anis Haroon, a member of the Women's Action Forum (WAF) in Pakistan, told Arab News on Friday women’s rights have suffered in Iran due to compulsory dress codes, segregation and torture by the morality police.  

“The role of the morality police should end,” she said. “The state has no right to [intervene] into the private lives of people. Women of Iran should be allowed to live like free human beings under the rights granted by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR),” Haroon added.  

Prominent lawyer Nighat Dad, who also runs the Digital Rights Foundation—a think tank tackling digital rights through a gender lens—wondered who defines what morality is. 

“The way it [Amini’s death] has sparked resistance, the [Iranian] regime won’t be able to stop now,” she told Arab News on Friday, adding that men supporting these protests is a “testament to what the people of Iran basically want from the regime now.” 

She said women were now deciding for themselves whether they wanted to wear the hijab or not. “And it is actually their own choice. When we say ‘my body, my choice’ in Pakistan, that is exactly what we mean. That we should have control over our body, not other people controlling it,” she added.   

Prominent dancer and activist, Sheema Kermani accused Iran’s morality police of committing grave human rights violations for decades. 

Kermani pointed out that the Iranian state was introducing restrictions on the internet and issuing warnings to citizens. “This is an ominous sign as it reflects the intention of the totalitarian regime to use more brutal force against the protestors,” she told Arab News on Friday.  

“We are proud of Iranian women for offering strong resistance despite being the most vulnerable group,” she said.  

Nayab Gohar Jan, an activist of the Pakistan Peoples Party, said it is time for Iran to have serious conversations about women’s rights. “Given the scale of protests across the country, it may also be time for Iranian authorities to open up dialogue on these issues,” Jan told Arab News.


Ex-PM Khan gets protective bail in two terrorism cases filed in Islamabad

Updated 13 sec ago

Ex-PM Khan gets protective bail in two terrorism cases filed in Islamabad

  • The cases were registered against him after his party supporters clashed with the police at Judicial Complex
  • Lahore High Court takes up contempt petition filed by Khan after Saturday’s police raid at his Lahore residence

ISLAMABAD: A Pakistani court on Tuesday granted protective bail to former prime minister Imran Khan in two terrorism cases which were filed against him after clashes broke out between the police and his party supporters at the Judicial Complex in Islamabad on Saturday.

Khan was scheduled to appear in a district and sessions court in a case involving the illegal sale of state gifts, commonly known as the Toshakhana reference, though the court decided to adjourn its proceedings after fighting intensified between the two sides.

Judge Zafar Iqbal allowed Khan to go back after signing the attendance roll after being informed that the former prime minister could not move to the courtroom amid teargas shelling by the police and stone pelting by the activists of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party.

The government decided to file cases against Khan and dozens of his party leaders and supporters on terrorism charges in the wake of the incident.

“The Lahore High Court on Tuesday approved Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Chairman Imran Khan’s protective bail in two terrorism cases filed against him in Islamabad,” reported Dawn newspapers, adding the bail would be effective until March 27.

Separately, a Lahore High Court judge took up a contempt petition filed by the former prime minister after police raided his residence in Lahore on the same day when he was in Islamabad for indictment in the Toshakhana reference.

The court had instructed the police to stand down last week after they went to Khan’s residence to detain him following the issuance of non-bailable arrest warrants against him by the Islamabad district court.

“I reached the Islamabad Toll Plaza and they attacked my house,” Dawn quoted Khan as saying in the court.

“The only message they have given is that there is no rule of law,” he added.

The judge announced he was going to initiate the contempt proceedings while also asking the authorities to provide details of cases against the former prime minister.

 


Months after Pakistan floods, millions lack safe water — UN

Updated 30 min 49 sec ago

Months after Pakistan floods, millions lack safe water — UN

  • Floods in Pakistan last year damaged most water pipelines in affected areas
  • More than 5.4 million people forced to rely solely on contaminated water from ponds

ISLAMABAD: The United Nations children’s agency on Tuesday warned that after last summer’s devastating floods, 10 million people in Pakistan, including children, still live in flood-affected areas without access to safe drinking water.

The statement from UNICEF underscored the dire situation in impoverished Pakistan, a country with a population of 220 million that months later is still struggling with the consequences of the flooding, as well as a spiraling economic crisis. The floods, which experts attribute in part to climate change, killed 1,739 people, including 647 children and 353 women.

So far, less than half of UNICEF’s funding appeal for Pakistan — 45 percent of $173.5 million — has been met. According to the agency, before the floods struck last June, water from only 36 percent of Pakistan’s water system was considered safe for human consumption.

The floods damaged most of the water pipelines systems in affected areas, forcing more than 5.4 million people, including 2.5 million children, to rely solely on contaminated water from ponds and wells, UNICEF said.

“Safe drinking water is not a privilege, it is a basic human right,” said Abdullah Fadil, the UNICEF representative in Pakistan. “Yet, every day, millions of girls and boys in Pakistan are fighting a losing battle against preventable waterborne diseases and the consequential malnutrition.”

“We need the continued support of our donors to provide safe water, build toilets and deliver vital sanitation services to these children and families who need them the most,” Fadil added.

Amid the crisis, Pakistan faces uncertainty about a bailout from the International Monetary Fund. Analysts say the revival of the $6 IMF bailout, which was signed in 2019, would help Pakistan. If the global lender released a key installment of the package, it would encourage other international financial institutions to help the country, they say.

At a UN-backed conference in Geneva in January, dozens of countries and international institutions pledged more than $9 billion to help Pakistan recover and rebuild from the floods. But most of the pledges were in form of project loans, and the projects are still in the planning stages.

Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif’s government is also facing a surge in militant attacks and political instability as his predecessor, Imran Khan, is campaigning for early elections. Sharif has rejected the demands by Khan, who was ousted in a no-confidence vote in Parliament last April.

Sharif seeks political and economic stability to ensure speedy reconstruction in the flood-hit areas, where the weakest and the children are paying the price.

“In flood-affected areas, more than 1.5 million boys and girls are already severely malnourished, and the numbers will only rise in the absence of safe water and proper sanitation,” UNICEF said.

The floods caused more than $30 billion in damages as large swaths of the country remained under water for months, forcing millions to live in tents or make-shift homes near stagnant waters that led to the spread of disease.

Sharif’s government is also trying to provide food and cash assistance to flood survivors as the Islamic fasting month of Ramadan starts this week, adding more financial burdens to the poorest of the population.


Pakistan’s parliament summoned in midst of crisis over former PM Khan 

Updated 25 min 13 sec ago

Pakistan’s parliament summoned in midst of crisis over former PM Khan 

  • Khan’s supporters have clashed with police several times over recent days during his court appearances
  • Speaker says ruling coalition called for parliament to “take important decisions” to enforce state’s writ

ISLAMABAD, March 21 : Pakistan’s parliament is to meet in a special joint session on Wednesday to “take important decisions” to enforce the state’s authority, media reported, in the midst of a crisis over anti-government defiance by former Prime Minister Imran Khan. 

Former cricket star Khan was prime minister from 2018 until 2022, when he was ousted from office in a parliamentary vote. Since then, he has been demanding a new election and holding protests across the country to press his case. 

His supporters have clashed with police several times over recent days as authorities try to force him to appear in court in connection with various cases brought against him. 

The office of the speaker of parliament, in calling Wednesday’s joint session, did not give a reason but the state-run Associated Press of Pakistan (APP) said the ruling coalition had called for parliament to “take important decisions” to ensure the writ of the state was enforced. 

The APP, reporting on a meeting attended by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and his cabinet, cited the participants as saying Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) was not a political party but “rather a gang of militants,” and its “enmity against the state” could not be tolerated. 

Sharif has rejected Khan’s demand for a new election saying it would be held as scheduled later this year. 

Parliament will meet in the capital, Islamabad, as Khan’s supporters gather for his latest rally in the eastern city of Lahore. 

The clashes between Khan’s supporters and the security forces have brought a new round of political chaos to the nuclear-armed country of 220 million people, which is in the midst of a crippling economic crisis. 

Khan says the government and the powerful military are trying to stop him from contesting the next election, scheduled for November. If convicted in a case, Khan could face disqualification from the polls. 

Both the government and military deny this. 

Police have arrested hundreds of Khan’s supporters in raids in recent days in response to the clashes. 
 


Gunmen slay 11 in northwest Pakistan ‘family feud’ – police

Updated 21 March 2023

Gunmen slay 11 in northwest Pakistan ‘family feud’ – police

  • Inter-family feuds are common in Pakistan, particularly in northwestern region
  • Police official says “up to five people opened fire” on a vehicle carrying 11 people

PESHAWAR: Gunmen killed 11 people including a prominent local politician in northwest Pakistan, police said Tuesday, an ambush blamed on a decades-long vendetta between families.

Inter-family feuds are common in Pakistan, but in the mountainous northwestern region where communities abide by traditional tribal honor codes they can be particularly protracted and violent.

Police said 42-year-old Atif Munsif Khan, leader of a district council in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, was killed on Monday night in the town of Havelian, 33 kilometers (20 miles) north of Islamabad.

District police official Omar Tufail told AFP that “up to five people opened fire from two sides” on a vehicle carrying Khan and 10 others, including bodyguards and a police escort, “killing them all on the spot.”

“The vehicle caught fire as a result and all on board were burned alive and the charred bodies are now beyond recognition,” he said.

Tufail said the Khan family registered a police complaint “blaming the assassination on their rivals” in a feud “said to be almost five decades old,” which also claimed the life of Khan’s father and grandfather.

“Dozens of people from both sides have been killed as a result of this family feud so far,” he added.

Another local senior police official, Sajid Tanoli, confirmed the incident and ruled out the involvement of militant groups such as the Pakistan Taliban which have long thrived in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

Khan was a member of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, led by former prime minister Imran Khan, although the men were not related.


Human Rights Watch urges Pakistan to drop ‘overboard’ terrorism charges against ex-PM’s supporters

Updated 21 March 2023

Human Rights Watch urges Pakistan to drop ‘overboard’ terrorism charges against ex-PM’s supporters

  • Police registered terrorism cases against over a dozen members of ex-PM Khan’s party over Saturday’s clashes
  • Human Rights Watch urges police to respect right to peaceful assembly, keep unlawful violence in check

ISLAMABAD: The Human Rights Watch (HRW) expressed worry on Tuesday over the use of “overboard” terrorism charges by the government against former prime minister Imran Khan’s supporters, a few days after his Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party supporters clashed with police in Pakistan’s capital.

Islamabad police on Sunday registered a terrorism case against more than a dozen members of Khan’s party for vandalism at the capital’s judicial complex. Clashes erupted on Saturday when the former prime minister arrived for a hearing in Islamabad in a case relating to the sale of state gifts while Khan was prime minister. Khan faces a slew of cases across the country, with charges against him ranging from murder to sedition, which carries the death penalty in Pakistan.

Punjab police and the caretaker provincial government have both accused Khan’s supporters of pelting stones and hurling petrol bombs at law enforcers. Khan denies the allegations and insists the Shehbaz Sharif-led ruling coalition government wants to kill him.

In its statement, the HRW urged Pakistan to “appropriately prosecute” any of the former prime minister’s supporters who have engaged in unlawful acts of violence, uphold the right to peaceful protest, and refrain from unlawful use of force.

“The use of Pakistan’s vague and overbroad anti-terrorism provisions against opposition protesters is very worrying,” Patricia Gossman, associate Asia director at Human Rights Watch, said in a statement. “If the authorities believe that Khan’s or his supporters’ actions have resulted in violence or constituted a real threat to public safety, they should be charged under the appropriate laws.”

Gossman stressed on the need for both sides to respect the rule of law and human rights and practice restraint. “It is vitally important for the police to respect the right to peaceful assembly while holding those responsible for unlawful violence to account,” she added.

Separately, Khan wrote to Pakistan’s chief justice on Monday and urged him to conduct an investigation into Saturday’s clash with law enforcers and the earlier police raid on his Lahore residence. According to a copy of the letter seen by Arab News, Khan stated that police attacked his party’s supporters when he had arrived at the Islamabad judicial complex “without any provocation.”

“I realized something was amiss and that it was not my arrest that was being planned but my assassination,” Khan wrote.

“In view of the continuing threats to my life and the assault on my home, I would request you to order a proper investigation into these events,” he added.

These actions have never happened before to anyone let alone a former Prime Minister and leader of the largest political party in Pakistan.”

On Monday night, PM Sharif chaired a meeting of the coalition government’s parties. In a press statement after meeteing, the government accused Khan’s party supporters of attacking law enforcers and vowed to take stern action against them.

“Attacks on officers and personnel of state institutions by violently trained gangs of banned organizations is very alarming,” the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) said in a statement.

The police in Pakistan have used abusive measures in the escalating confrontation between police and Imran Khan’s supporters, Human Rights Watch said today.

They have charged protesters with batons and detained them under sweeping counter-terrorism laws. The authorities should appropriately prosecute any of the former prime minister’s supporters who have engaged in unlawful acts of violence, uphold the right to peaceful protest, and refrain from the unlawful use of force.

“The use of Pakistan’s vague and overbroad anti-terrorism provisions against opposition protesters is very worrying,” said Patricia Gossman, associate Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “If the authorities believe that Khan’s or his supporters’ actions have resulted in violence or constituted a real threat to public safety, they should be charged under the appropriate laws.”

All sides should display restraint and respect for human rights and the rule of law,” Gossman said. “It is vitally important for the police to respect the right to peaceful assembly while holding those responsible for unlawful violence to account.”