Families demand return of bodies as Indian authorities launch probe into deadly Kashmir encounter

Members of Jammu and Kashmir People's Conference hold placards as they shout slogans during a protest demanding the return of dead bodies of civilians for proper burial, in Srinagar, Indian-controlled Kashmir, on November 18, 2021. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 18 November 2021
Follow

Families demand return of bodies as Indian authorities launch probe into deadly Kashmir encounter

  • Four people were killed in a police raid at a commercial complex in Hyderpora area in Srinagar on Monday
  • All Parties Hurriyat Conference announces a protest shutdown of the Kashmir valley region on Friday

NEW DELHI: The administration of Indian-controlled Kashmir ordered a probe on Thursday into a controversial police operation which killed four people earlier this week and led to protests from families demanding that their bodies be returned for burial.
Two civilians and two suspected rebels died on Monday in a police raid at a commercial complex in Hyderpora area in Srinagar, the region's capital. According to police, the civilians — businessman Altaf Ahmad Bhat, 48, and Mudasir Gul, 40, a dental surgeon — died in the crossfire, but witnesses and families of the victims said troops had used them as human shields.

The deaths of Bhat and Gul sparked outrage in the Muslim-majority region. Their families have held sit-ins in Srinagar demanding justice and that the bodies be returned for a proper Islamic funeral after authorities secretly buried them at a remote graveyard.

After the protest ended when police detained some of the demonstrating relatives on Wednesday night, Manoj Sinha, a New Delhi appointee serving as Kashmir's top administrator, said the administration had ordered a "magisterial inquiry" into the killings.

"Govt will take suitable action as soon as report is submitted in a time-bound manner," he said in a tweet.

Dilbag Singh, director general of Kashmir Police, told the media he would “look into the demands of the families."
"We are open to corrections if anything has gone wrong. A police probe will also find out what went wrong," he said. "We will find out what happened in the Hyderpora encounter. We are for the safety of people and will not shy away from a probe."

But Saima Bhat, a Srinagar-based journalist and the niece of one of the victims, told Arab News her family is more concerned about receiving the body for burial rather than the probe.

"We don’t care about the inquiry right now, our focus is to get the dead body of my uncle. I have met people in the administration and they have not said anything concrete on this matter so far," she said.

According to the media reports, the victims were buried 80 kilometers from Srinagar, following a policy that started last year, in which suspected rebels and their alleged associates, including civilians, are laid to rest in unmarked graves in remote areas to prevent large gatherings.  

A witness who was present at the Hyderpora complex during Monday's encounter told Arab News the victims were used as "human shields."

"It was Monday evening between 5:30 and 6 p.m. when the whole area was cordoned. Bhat who was closing his shop was asked to accompany the troops to the building. Gul was also taken. Bhat came back twice but he did not return the third time. Similarly Gul was brought back once but he did not return a second time from the encounter site," he said on condition of anonymity. "I feel they were used as human shields."

The controversial encounter has become a political issue, with the pro-independence grouping All Parties Hurriyat Conference announcing a protest shutdown of the Kashmir valley region on Friday.

Kashmiris for years have accused Indian troops of targeting civilians and committing abuses with impunity. The allegations include staging gunfights and then saying the victims were militants.
Some have doubts whether the announced probe will bring justice.
"So far more than 100 commissions have been set up," Hurriyat chief Mirwaiz Umar Farooq told Arab News. "Not in a single case justice has been served."
Srinagar-based journalist Gowhar Geelani told Arab News that such inquiries are used to "buy time and tire out the families." 

"All they seem to care about is the fake narrative of normalcy," he said.
Prof. Siddiq Wahid, political analyst from Srinagar, questioned the meaning of "judicial probe" as he said soldiers enjoy immunity.

"What the world needs to know is that the soldiers who committed this crime are protected, by a law called the Armed Forces Special Powers Act," he said. "What are we to expect from a government ordered judicial probe?"

India's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) welcomed the inquiry.

"I hope if some injustice has taken place that should be addressed and the families should get justice," BJP spokesperson in Kashmir Manzoor Bhat told Arab News.

"The anger of the people is justified but the political parties are now trying to vitiate the atmosphere in the valley in an attempt to take advantage of the situation."


Federal agents must limit tear gas for now at protests outside Portland ICE building, judge says

Updated 04 February 2026
Follow

Federal agents must limit tear gas for now at protests outside Portland ICE building, judge says

  • The ruling came in response to a lawsuit filed by the ACLU of Oregon on behalf of protesters and freelance journalists covering demonstrations at the flashpoint US Immigration and Customs Enforcement building

PORTLAND, Oregon: A judge in Oregon on Tuesday temporarily restricted federal officers from using tear gas at protests at the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement building in Portland, just days after agents launched gas at a crowd of demonstrators including young children that local officials described as peaceful.
US District Judge Michael Simon ordered federal officers not to use chemical or projectile munitions on people who pose no imminent threat of physical harm, or who are merely trespassing or refusing to disperse. Simon also limited federal officers from firing munitions at the head, neck or torso “unless the officer is legally justified in using deadly force against that person.”
Simon, whose temporary restraining order is in effect for 14 days, wrote that the nation “is now at a crossroads.”
“In a well-functioning constitutional democratic republic, free speech, courageous newsgathering, and nonviolent protest are all permitted, respected, and even celebrated,” he wrote. “In helping our nation find its constitutional compass, an impartial and independent judiciary operating under the rule of law has a responsibility that it may not shirk.”
Ruling follows a lawsuit filed by the ACLU of Oregon
The ruling came in response to a lawsuit filed by the ACLU of Oregon on behalf of protesters and freelance journalists covering demonstrations at the flashpoint US Immigration and Customs Enforcement building.
The suit names as defendants the Department of Homeland Security and its head Kristi Noem, as well as President Donald Trump. It argues that federal officers’ use of chemical munitions and excessive force is a retaliation against protesters that chills their First Amendment rights.
The Department of Homeland Security said federal officers have “followed their training and used the minimum amount of force necessary to protect themselves, the public, and federal property.”
“DHS is taking appropriate and constitutional measures to uphold the rule of law and protect our officers and the public from dangerous rioters,” spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said.
Courts consider question of tear gas use
Cities across the country have seen demonstrations against the administration’s immigration enforcement surge.
Last month, a federal appeals court suspended a decision that prohibited federal officers from using tear gas or pepper spray against peaceful protesters in Minnesota who aren’t obstructing law enforcement. An appeals court also halted a ruling from a federal judge in Chicago that restricted federal agents from using certain riot control weapons, such as tear gas and pepper balls, unless necessary to prevent an immediate threat. A similar lawsuit brought by the state is now before the same judge.
The Oregon complaint describes instances in which the plaintiffs — including a protester known for wearing a chicken costume, a married couple in their 80s and two freelance journalists — had chemical or “less-lethal” munitions used against them.
In October, 83-year-old Vietnam War veteran Richard Eckman and his 84-year-old wife Laurie Eckman joined a peaceful march to the ICE building. Federal officers then launched chemical munitions at the crowd, hitting Laurie Eckman in the head with a pepper ball and causing her to bleed, according to the complaint. With bloody clothes and hair, she sought treatment at a hospital, which gave her instructions for caring for a concussion. A munition also hit her husband’s walker, the complaint says.
Jack Dickinson, who frequently attends protests at the ICE building in a chicken suit, has had munitions aimed at him while posing no threat, according to the complaint. Federal officers have shot munitions at his face respirator and at his back, and launched a tear-gas canister that sparked next to his leg and burned a hole in his costume, the complaint says.
Freelance journalists Hugo Rios and Mason Lake have similarly been hit with pepper balls and tear gassed while marked as press, the complaint says.
“Defendants must be enjoined from gassing, shooting, hitting and arresting peaceful Portlanders and journalists willing to document federal abuses as if they are enemy combatants,” the complaint states.
The owner and residents of the affordable housing complex across the street from the ICE building has filed a separate lawsuit, similarly seeking to restrict federal officers’ use of tear gas because its residents have been repeatedly exposed over the past year.
Local officials have also spoken out against use of chemical munitions. Portland Mayor Keith Wilson demanded ICE leave the city after federal officers used such munitions Saturday at what he described as a “peaceful daytime protest where the vast majority of those present violated no laws, made no threat, and posed no danger to federal forces.”
“To those who continue to work for ICE: Resign. To those who control this facility: Leave,” Wilson wrote in a statement Saturday night.
The protest was one of many similar demonstrations nationwide against the immigration crackdown in cities like Minneapolis, where in recent weeks federal agents killed two people, Alex Pretti and Renee Good.