Facebook posts related to Israel, Palestinians must include ‘bias’ review

Facebook said it would look at the recommendations and added that it “welcomed” the Oversight board's decision. (File/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 15 September 2021
Follow

Facebook posts related to Israel, Palestinians must include ‘bias’ review

  • Facebook’s Oversight Board recommended an independent review into alleged bias in moderating posts related to Israel and Palestinians

LONDON: Facebook’s Oversight Board recommended on Tuesday that an independent review be conducted to examine alleged bias in moderating posts related to Israel and Palestinians.

The recommendation comes shortly after Facebook failed to answer the board’s questions regarding the alleged censorship of Palestinian activists.

In response, Facebook said it would look at the recommendations and added that it “welcomed” the Oversight board's decision.

The case referred to a Facebook user in Egypt who shared a post last May about the escalating violence in Israel and the occupied territories of Gaza and the West Bank.

The post was from a verified news page and showed two men from Al-Qassam Brigades, the military wing of the Palestinian group Hamas. 

The text accompanying the post read: “The resistance leadership in the common room gives the occupation a respite until 18:00 to withdraw its soldiers from Al-Aqsa Mosque and Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood otherwise he who warns is excused. Abu Ubaida — Al-Qassam Brigades military spokesman.”

Facebook originally removed the post for violating its Dangerous Individuals and Organizations Community Standard policy but later restored it after the user appealed directly to the Oversight board.

As part of its investigation, the Oversight Board asked Facebook if it had received official or unofficial requests from the Israeli government to remove content related to Israeli-Palestinian violence last May. 

Facebook confirmed that it did not receive official requests to remove content but did not answer whether it received unofficial requests. 

Tech giants came under heavy scrutiny last May when they were accused of censoring Palestinian-related content on social media platforms. 

Read more: How Palestinian-Israeli conflict changed the way social media firms deal with content here.

7amleh, a Palestinian digital rights group, found that Instagram, for instance, removed approximately 500 posts related to the Gaza conflict between May 6 and 19.

Read more: Facebook, Instagram accused of bias by censoring Palestinian content here

 


Disinformation the new enemy in disaster zones, says Red Cross

Updated 05 March 2026
Follow

Disinformation the new enemy in disaster zones, says Red Cross

  • “Harmful information and dehumanizing narratives” undermines humanitarian aid and putting lives of aid workers at risk
  • Between 2020 and 2024, disasters affected nearly 700 million people, displaced over 105 million, and killed more than 270,000 — doubling the number in need of humanitarian aid

GENEVA: The rise of disinformation is undermining humanitarian aid and putting lives at risk, while disasters are affecting ever more people, the Red Cross warned Thursday.
“Between 2020 and 2024, disasters affected nearly 700 million people, caused more than 105 million displacements, and claimed over 270,000 lives,” the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies said.
The number of people needing humanitarian assistance more than doubled in the same timeframe, the IFRC said in its World Disasters Report 2026.
But the world’s largest humanitarian network said that “harmful information and dehumanizing narratives” were increasingly undermining trust, putting the lives of aid workers at risk.
“In polarized and politically-charged contexts, humanitarian principles such as neutrality and impartiality are increasingly misunderstood, misrepresented or deliberately attacked online,” it said.
The IFRC has more than 17 million volunteers across more than 191 countries.
“In every crisis I have witnessed, information is as essential as food, water and shelter,” said the Geneva-based federation’s secretary general Jagan Chapagain.
“But when information is false, misleading or deliberately manipulated, it can deepen fear, obstruct humanitarian access and cost lives.”
He said harmful information was not a new phenomenon, but it was now moving “with unprecedented speed and reach.”
Chapagain said digital platforms were proving “fertile ground for lies.”
The IFRC report said the challenge nowadays was no longer about the availability of information but its reliability, noting that the production and spread of disinformation was easily amplified by artificial intelligence.

- ‘Life and death’ -

The report cited numerous recent examples of harmful information hampering crisis response.
During the 2024 floods in Valencia, false narratives online accused the Spanish Red Cross of diverting aid to migrants, which in turn fueled “xenophobic attacks on volunteers,” the IFRC said.
In South Sudan, rumors that humanitarian agencies were distributing poisoned food “caused people to avoid life-saving aid” and led to threats against Red Cross staff.
In Lebanon, false claims that volunteers were spreading Covid-19, favoring certain groups with aid and providing unsafe cholera vaccines eroded trust and endangered vulnerable communities, the IFRC said.
And in Bangladesh, during political unrest, volunteers faced “widespread accusations of inaction and political alignment,” leading to harassment and reputational damage, it added.
Similar events were registered by the IFRC in Sudan, Myanmar, Peru, the United States, New Zealand, Canada, Kenya and Bulgaria.
The report underlined that around 94 percent of disasters were handled by national authorities and local communities, without international interventions.
“However, while volunteers, local leaders and community media are often the most trusted messengers, they operate in increasingly hostile and polarized information environments,” the IFRC said.
The federation called on governments, tech firms, humanitarian agencies and local actors to recognize that reliable information “is a matter of life and death.”
“Without trust, people are less likely to prepare, seek help or follow life-saving guidance; with it, communities act together, absorb shocks and recover more effectively,” said Chapagain.
The organization urged technology platforms to prioritize authoritative information from trusted sources in crisis contexts, and transparently moderate harmful content.
And it said humanitarian agencies needed to make preparing to deal with disinformation “a core function” of their operations, with trained teams and analytics.