Relatives of Afghan aid worker, family killed in US drone strike threaten lawsuit

Afghan residents and family members of the victims gather next to a damaged vehicle inside a house, a day after an August 29 US drone airstrike in Kabul, Afghanistan, on August 30, 2021. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 15 September 2021
Follow

Relatives of Afghan aid worker, family killed in US drone strike threaten lawsuit

  • Zemari Ahmadi died alongside nine others, seven of them children, in a US drone strike on August 29
  • “America must pay compensation to my family,” Ahmadi’s brother tells Arab News

KABUL: The brother of Zemari Ahmadi, one of ten people killed in an American drone strike in Afghanistan last month, said this week the family would file a lawsuit and wanted the United States to pay compensation.
Ahmadi, 43, a longtime worker for a US aid group, had just arrived home on August 29 when his vehicle was hit by a drone, blowing out doors and windows in the courtyard, spraying shrapnel, and killing 10 people, seven of them children.
An investigation published in the New York Times last week and based on in-depth video analysis and interviews at the site cast doubt on the US account that a Reaper drone followed Ahmadi’s car for hours and fired based on evidence it contained a bomb and posed an imminent threat to US and allied troops at Kabul airport.
Ahmadi’s brother Aimal Ahmadi, who lost his three-year-old daughter in the attack, said the family was seeking justice.
“We are destroyed,” he told Arab News in an interview on Monday. “Those who carried out this attack and killed our loved ones must now be punished. America must pay compensation to my family.”
“We will file a lawsuit,” he added.




Emal Ahmadi shows a photo of his daughter who was killed in a U.S. drone strike on their home on August 29, in Kabul, Afghanistan. (AP)

Aimal said his deceased brother had been a “law-abiding citizen” who, along with their nephew Nasir Haideri, had applied for the US Special Immigrant Visa, which was being processed at the time of the strike.




The undated photo shows Zemari Ahmadi, a longtime worker for a US aid group, who was killed in an August 29 US drone attack in Kabul, Afghanistan. (Photo courtesy: Social Media)

Haideri, who also died in the attack, was to be married in the first week of September and start a new life in America, his uncle said. 
He rejected reports of the presence of explosives in Ahmadi’s car.
“They were water containers which he had brought home from the office as we are facing a shortage of water,” Aimal said. “He filled them at his office and would bring them home. All the evidence is contrary to the false claims of the Americans.”
“Washington must provide proof that Ahmadi was carrying a car full of explosives,” he said.




Romal Ahmadi, right, speaks during an interview with the Associated Press in Kabul, Afghanistan, on September 2, 2021. (AP)

Ahmadi’s son Samim, who survived the attack, said the family had not yet been contacted by US officials: “We are waiting for a call and we want justice.”


UK upper house approves social media ban for under-16s

Updated 22 January 2026
Follow

UK upper house approves social media ban for under-16s

LONDON: Britain’s upper house of parliament voted Wednesday in favor of banning under?16s from using social media, raising pressure on the government to match a similar ban passed in Australia.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Monday he was not ruling out any options and pledged action to protect children, but his government wants to wait for the results of a consultation due this summer before legislating.
Calls have risen across the opposition and within the governing Labour party for the UK to follow Australia, where under-16s have been barred from social media applications since December 10.
The amendment from opposition Conservative lawmaker John Nash passed with 261 votes to 150 in the House of Lords, co?sponsored by a Labour and a Liberal Democrat peer.
“Tonight, peers put our children’s future first,” Nash said. “This vote begins the process of stopping the catastrophic harm that social media is inflicting on a generation.”
Before the vote, Downing Street said the government would not accept the amendment, which now goes to the Labour-controlled lower House of Commons. More than 60 Labour MPs have urged Starmer to back a ban.
Public figures including actor Hugh Grant urged the government to back the proposal, saying parents alone cannot counter social media harms.
Some child-protection groups warn a ban would create a false sense of security.
A YouGov poll in December found 74 percent of Britons supported a ban. The Online Safety Act requires secure age?verification for harmful content.