Zahir Jaffer’s confession not enough for conviction — Mukadam lawyer

Zahir Zakir Jaffer (second right), main suspect in the July 20 murder of Noor Mukadam, is led by Islamabad police officers to the court in Islamabad, Pakistan, on August 2, 2021. (Photo courtesy: Social Media)
Short Url
Updated 13 September 2021
Follow

Zahir Jaffer’s confession not enough for conviction — Mukadam lawyer

  • Jaffer told police investigators he killed Noor Mukadam after she rejected a marriage proposal
  • First trial is scheduled for September 23 involving 12 people, including Jaffer’s parents and household staff

LAHORE: Zahir Jaffer’s confession before police to beheading Noor Mukadam was not enough for a conviction, the victim’s family lawyer has said, after a charge-sheet filed by police showed the prime suspect had admitted to committing the grisly July murder.

Mukadam, the 27-year-old daughter of Shaukat Mukadam, Pakistan’s former ambassador to South Korea and Kazakhstan, was found beheaded at Jaffer’s residence in Islamabad’s upscale F-7/4 sector on July 20 in a case that has sparked public outrage and grabbed media attention unlike any other recent crime against women.

Jaffer was arrested from the crime scene on the day of the murder and has been in Adiala Jail in Rawalpindi on judicial remand since early August. His parents, Zakir Jaffer and Ismat Adamjee, and three members of household staff, are also under arrest for a range of charges, including abetment and concealment of evidence.

Despite the confession to police, there was still a long way to conviction, Shah Khawar, the legal counsel for the Mukadam family, told Arab News. 

“This is Zahir’s first confession during interrogation under Section 161 of Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) which was reduced into writing by the police officer,” Khawar said. “No legal authenticity is attached to this confession as it was more of an inference and it cannot be presented as evidence.”

“A confession before police has no evidentiary value, unless he [accused] volunteers himself before a judicial magistrate to record his confessional statement.”

In accordance with the procedures, Khawar said, the magistrate would ask police to leave the record room, brief the accused about all the consequences of his confession and give him half an hour to decide whether he indeed wants to testify.

“When the magistrate is certain that the accused wants to make a confessional statement voluntarily, the magistrate notes down the confession and gives one copy of the sealed document to police and other to the sessions court,” Khawar said.

Even if an accused makes a judicial confession, he can still retract it in court, although that would more difficult, the lawyer explained. 

“In such situations the magistrate appears in the court as a witness and tells the court that he gave the accused all opportunities and fulfilled all legal formalities before he [the accused] had made a confessional statement,” Khawar said.

The first trial in the murder case is scheduled for September 23, involving 12 accused, including Jaffer’s parents, household staff and six members of counselling center Therapy Works where Jaffer had enrolled in a certification course to practice as a psychotherapist. 

A 670-page police charge sheet submitted in court in late August quotes Jaffer as telling investigators he had beheaded Mukadam after she refused to marry him.

“He confessed to have invited Noor Mukadam to his house in sector F-7/4 and discussed a marriage proposal. Noor refused to marry him and tried to leave the house,” the document says. “Things got worse and the two got into a spat and he tried to detain her forcibly.” 

Mukadam tried to leave the house twice, according to the document, but Jaffer’s staff were ordered not to let anyone out of the residence. Jaffer’s security guard and gardener did not let her open the main gate.

“The suspect had directed his household staff including the security guard not to let anybody inside or go outside the home.” 

When Mukadam jumped out of the window and tried to escape, the police record said Jaffer dragged her back to the house and beheaded her.


PIA denies social media claim its entire flight crew went missing abroad

Updated 10 sec ago
Follow

PIA denies social media claim its entire flight crew went missing abroad

  • Airline says the allegation emerged from ‘anti-Pakistan quarters’ to defame both the national carrier
  • Some social media posts recently said a PIA flight crew had gone missing during a layover in Toronto

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) on Sunday dismissed as “fake news” a social media claim that the entire crew of one of its flights had disappeared overseas, saying the post was circulated to defame both the national carrier and the country.

The statement came after social media posts said a PIA flight crew had gone missing during a layover in Toronto, Canada.

Previously, there have been reports that individual crew members have used layovers to remain abroad, often linked by analysts to economic conditions at home and perceived asylum opportunities under Canada’s immigration policies. However, PIA has adopted measures such as holding passports with station managers and assigning older crew to Canada routes to curb the trend.

“A tweet, circulated by certain anti-Pakistan quarters, claiming that the whole crew of a particular #PIA flight is missing, is entirely baseless,” the airline announced in a post on X, adding that the purpose of the message “seems to malign PIA and #Pakistan.”

“There has been no such incident, and the news is fake,” it said.

According to local media reports, the information had been circulated by an “Afghan and anti-Pakistan account.”

“The misleading tweet is part of a well-conceived plan based on hostility toward Pakistan and is aimed at damaging the reputation of the national airline and the country,” Pakistan’s English-language broadsheet, Dawn, quoted the airline spokesperson as saying.

Pakistan has been striving to privatize PIA along with other state-owned enterprises under an International Monetary Fund (IMF) loan program.

The airline was banned from operating in Britain and Europe, though those restrictions have been removed more recently.