Zahir Jaffer’s confession not enough for conviction — Mukadam lawyer

Zahir Zakir Jaffer (second right), main suspect in the July 20 murder of Noor Mukadam, is led by Islamabad police officers to the court in Islamabad, Pakistan, on August 2, 2021. (Photo courtesy: Social Media)
Short Url
Updated 13 September 2021
Follow

Zahir Jaffer’s confession not enough for conviction — Mukadam lawyer

  • Jaffer told police investigators he killed Noor Mukadam after she rejected a marriage proposal
  • First trial is scheduled for September 23 involving 12 people, including Jaffer’s parents and household staff

LAHORE: Zahir Jaffer’s confession before police to beheading Noor Mukadam was not enough for a conviction, the victim’s family lawyer has said, after a charge-sheet filed by police showed the prime suspect had admitted to committing the grisly July murder.

Mukadam, the 27-year-old daughter of Shaukat Mukadam, Pakistan’s former ambassador to South Korea and Kazakhstan, was found beheaded at Jaffer’s residence in Islamabad’s upscale F-7/4 sector on July 20 in a case that has sparked public outrage and grabbed media attention unlike any other recent crime against women.

Jaffer was arrested from the crime scene on the day of the murder and has been in Adiala Jail in Rawalpindi on judicial remand since early August. His parents, Zakir Jaffer and Ismat Adamjee, and three members of household staff, are also under arrest for a range of charges, including abetment and concealment of evidence.

Despite the confession to police, there was still a long way to conviction, Shah Khawar, the legal counsel for the Mukadam family, told Arab News. 

“This is Zahir’s first confession during interrogation under Section 161 of Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) which was reduced into writing by the police officer,” Khawar said. “No legal authenticity is attached to this confession as it was more of an inference and it cannot be presented as evidence.”

“A confession before police has no evidentiary value, unless he [accused] volunteers himself before a judicial magistrate to record his confessional statement.”

In accordance with the procedures, Khawar said, the magistrate would ask police to leave the record room, brief the accused about all the consequences of his confession and give him half an hour to decide whether he indeed wants to testify.

“When the magistrate is certain that the accused wants to make a confessional statement voluntarily, the magistrate notes down the confession and gives one copy of the sealed document to police and other to the sessions court,” Khawar said.

Even if an accused makes a judicial confession, he can still retract it in court, although that would more difficult, the lawyer explained. 

“In such situations the magistrate appears in the court as a witness and tells the court that he gave the accused all opportunities and fulfilled all legal formalities before he [the accused] had made a confessional statement,” Khawar said.

The first trial in the murder case is scheduled for September 23, involving 12 accused, including Jaffer’s parents, household staff and six members of counselling center Therapy Works where Jaffer had enrolled in a certification course to practice as a psychotherapist. 

A 670-page police charge sheet submitted in court in late August quotes Jaffer as telling investigators he had beheaded Mukadam after she refused to marry him.

“He confessed to have invited Noor Mukadam to his house in sector F-7/4 and discussed a marriage proposal. Noor refused to marry him and tried to leave the house,” the document says. “Things got worse and the two got into a spat and he tried to detain her forcibly.” 

Mukadam tried to leave the house twice, according to the document, but Jaffer’s staff were ordered not to let anyone out of the residence. Jaffer’s security guard and gardener did not let her open the main gate.

“The suspect had directed his household staff including the security guard not to let anybody inside or go outside the home.” 

When Mukadam jumped out of the window and tried to escape, the police record said Jaffer dragged her back to the house and beheaded her.


Pakistani man convicted in US in political assassination plot tied to Iranian paramilitary

Updated 07 March 2026
Follow

Pakistani man convicted in US in political assassination plot tied to Iranian paramilitary

  • Asif Merchant, 47, worked for Pakistani banks for decades before going into clothing and other businesses
  • He testified he met a Revolutionary Guard operative who gave him countersurveillance training, assignments

NEW YORK: A Pakistani business owner who tried to hire hit men to kill a US politician was convicted Friday in a trial that showcased allegations of Iran-backed plotting on American soil.

As the Iran war unfolded in the Mideast, Asif Merchant acknowledged in a US court that he sought to put an assassination in motion during the 2024 presidential campaign — a plot that was quickly disrupted by American investigators before it had a chance to proceed.

A jury in Brooklyn convicted Merchant on terrorism and murder for hire charges.

The verdict after only a couple hours of deliberations followed a weeklong trial that included remarkable testimony from Merchant himself.

Merchant told the jury he was carrying out instructions from a contact in the Islamic Republic’s powerful paramilitary Revolutionary Guard. According to Merchant, the handler never specified a target but broached names including then-candidate Donald Trump, then-President Joe Biden and Nikki Haley, the former UN ambassador who was also in the race for a time.

The Iranian government has denied trying to kill US officials.

The nascent plot fell apart after Merchant showed an acquaintance what he had in mind by using objects on a napkin to depict a shooting at a rally. He asked the man to help him hire assassins. Instead, he was introduced to undercover FBI agents who were secretly recording him, as had the acquaintance.

Merchant told the supposed hit men he needed services that could include killing “some political person” and paid them $5,000 in cash in a parked car in Manhattan.

“This man landed on American soil hoping to kill President Trump — instead, he was met with the might of American law enforcement,” US Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement released after the conviction.

Merchant’s attorney, Avraham Moskowitz, didn’t immediately reply to a message seeking comment.

Merchant, 47, worked for Pakistani banks for decades before going into clothing and other businesses. He has two families, in Pakistan and Iran, and he sometimes visited the US for his garment business.

Merchant testified that he met a Revolutionary Guard intelligence operative about three years ago. The contact gave him countersurveillance training and assignments including the assassination scheme, Merchant said.

He maintained that he had to do his handler’s bidding to protect loved ones in Iran. The defendant said he reluctantly went through the motions but thought he’d be arrested and explain his situation to authorities before anyone was killed.

“I was going along with it,” he said, speaking in Urdu through a court interpreter.

Prosecutors emphasized that Merchant admitted taking steps to enact the plan on behalf of the Revolutionary Guard, which the US considers a foreign terrorist organization, and he didn’t proactively go to authorities.

Instead, he was packing for a flight to Pakistan when he was arrested on July 12, 2024, a day before an unrelated attempt on Trump’s life in Butler, Pennsylvania. Officials said it appeared the Butler gunman acted alone but that they had been tracking a threat on Trump’s life from Iran, a claim that the Islamic Republic called “unsubstantiated and malicious.”

When Merchant subsequently spoke to FBI agents to explore the possibility of a cooperation agreement, he didn’t say he had acted out of fear for his family.

Prosecutors argued that he didn’t back up a defense of acting under duress. Merchant sought to persuade jurors he simply didn’t think the agents would believe him because they seemed to “think that I am some type of super-spy,” which he said he was “absolutely not.”