Stolen 16th-century Qur’an to be returned to Turkey

The Qur’an was taken at gunpoint by robbers in Istanbul in 2015. (File/Shutterstock)
Short Url
Updated 16 August 2021
Follow

Stolen 16th-century Qur’an to be returned to Turkey

  • Rare item seized by UK police after being put up for auction at Christie’s
  • Qur’an taken at gunpoint by robbers in Istanbul in 2015

LONDON: A rare 16th-century Qur’an allegedly stolen in an armed robbery six years ago is set to be returned to Turkey.

The Qur’an, which had been listed for auction at Christie’s in London in October 2017, was expected to be sold for between £120,000 ($166,000) and £180,000, before it was removed from a sale of Indian and Islamic art.

Turkish authorities said the precious item had been taken in a “gunpoint robbery” in Istanbul in February 2015 and smuggled out of the country.

Three men were convicted and jailed for over 10 years each for the robbery, in which the owner was pepper-sprayed and had his face wrapped in tape. A fourth attacker is still at large.

Lawyers for Zaher Al-Hajjeh, who claimed to be the legal owner of the Qur’an, wrote to Christie’s last year threatening legal action if the book was not returned to him or he was not paid compensation, estimating it at a value of £750,000.

It was then seized in February 2020 by the Metropolitan Police after obtaining a warrant to search for the “item of cultural significance.”

In July 2021, a High Court judge dismissed Al-Hajjeh’s claim that the Metropolitan Police had misled a judge into granting them a search warrant, saying there were “strong grounds to believe that the stolen Qur’an was the artefact placed with Christie’s for auction” by Al-Hajjeh.

The judge added that Al-Hajjeh’s claim to being the owner of the book, and how it came into his possession, “was to be viewed with very considerable skepticism.”

A Christie’s spokesman said: “We can confirm Christie’s, a third party in this matter, complied with the requirement of the Metropolitan Police. We have no further comment to make.”


Row erupts in UK over support for British-Egyptian activist Alaa Abd El-Fattah

Updated 54 min 52 sec ago
Follow

Row erupts in UK over support for British-Egyptian activist Alaa Abd El-Fattah

  • Arab Spring campaigner’s ‘abhorrent’ social media posts resurface after he arrived in Britain following release from Egyptian prison
  • PM Starmer criticized for glowing welcome to activist who had previously been supported by both Tory and Labour governments

LONDON: The UK prime minister is facing criticism after he celebrated the return to Britain of a human rights activist who was recently released from an Egyptian prison but whose past social media posts apparently contained violent and antisemitic language.
Successive British governments have campaigned for the release of Alaa Abd El-Fattah, a dual national who had been imprisoned in Egypt for most of the past 14 years. He returned to the UK on Friday after Egyptian authorities lifted a travel ban that had forced him to remain in the country since he was freed in September.
But a senior member of the opposition Conservative Party on Saturday criticized Prime Minister Keir Starmer for giving a “personal, public endorsement” to Abd El-Fattah when Starmer said he was “delighted” the activist had been reunited with his family in Britain.
Robert Jenrick, the Conservative spokesman on justice issues, demanded to know whether Starmer knew about historical social media posts in which Abd El-Fattah allegedly endorsed killing “Zionists’’ and police. Jenrick also called on Starmer to condemn Abd El-Fattah’s statements and withdraw his “unalloyed endorsement” of the activist.
“Nobody should be imprisoned arbitrarily nor for peaceful dissent,’’ Jenrick wrote. “But neither should the prime minister place the authority of his office behind someone whose own words cross into the language of racism and bloodshed.”
The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office said in a statement that it had been “a long-standing priority” of governments under both major parties to work for Abd El-Fattah’s release. But that does not imply an endorsement of his social media posts, the spokesman said.
“The government condemns Mr. El-Fattah’s historic tweets and considers them to be abhorrent,” the statement said, using a slightly different style for his last name.
Abd El-Fattah’s family in the UK had vigorously campaigned for his release, arguing that he had spent most of the past 14 years behind bars because of his opposition to the government of President Abdel-Fattah El-Sisi.
His mother, Laila Soueif, 69, staged a 10-month hunger strike to pressure British authorities to do more to secure her son’s release.
Starmer on Friday paid tribute to Abd El-Fattah’s family and all the others who campaigned for his freedom.
“I’m delighted that Alaa Abd El-Fattah is back in the UK and has been reunited with his loved ones, who must be feeling profound relief,” Starmer said.
But soon after Abd El-Fattah arrived at London’s Heathrow Airport, critics began circulating historical social media posts in which he appeared to endorse the killing of Zionists and police.
The Times of London reported that Abd El-Fattah has previously said the comments were taken out of context and were part of a “private conversation” that took place during an Israeli offensive in the Gaza Strip.
Abd El-Fattah’s press team didn’t immediately response to a request for comment, and it was not immediately clear whether the posts were authentic.