India’s Muslim-majority islands slam meat-free school meals

The administration in the usually tranquil group of islands urged the Kerala High Court to lift a June 22 stay on two orders introduced by the territory’s new administrator, Praful Khoda Patel. (Wikipedia)
Short Url
Updated 15 July 2021
Follow

India’s Muslim-majority islands slam meat-free school meals

  • Lakshadweep locals accuse authorities of ‘culture attack’ with reforms

NEW DELHI: Locals in India’s Muslim-majority archipelago of Lakshadweep, near the southern state of Kerala, on Wednesday decried a move to ban meat items from midday meals in schools, terming the measure and other controversial reforms as “anti-culture.”

On Tuesday, the administration in the usually tranquil group of islands urged the Kerala High Court (KHC) to lift a June 22 stay on two orders introduced in Lakshadweep by the Union Territory’s (UT) new administrator, Praful Khoda Patel.

These include removing beef and other meat items from midday meals served at public schools and the closure of dairy farms.

Locals are complaining that the latest policies initiated by Patel are blatantly anti-Muslim and threaten the peace of the archipelago, accusing the government of “playing politics.”

“Children have been given high-protein, non-vegetarian food for years, which comes under the budget. Then why ban them?” Dr. P. Koya, former provincial commissioner and a leader of the “Save Lakshadweep Campaign,” told Arab News.

“There is some motivation behind the move. Why were no local stakeholders taken into confidence? This is a disrespect to democracy,” Dr. Koya said, adding that the administration “does not have a scientific mind.”

Local officials were unavailable for comment when contacted by Arab News on Wednesday.

However, on Tuesday, the administration justified the meat ban by saying that islanders needed more fruit and dry fruits.

“As meat and chicken are normally part of the regular menu in almost all Lakshadweep families, the UT administration decided to omit them and instead provide fruit and dry fruit, which are consumed less by the islanders,” the government told the KHC.

Dr. Koya rejected the reasoning, arguing: “How can you replace high-protein meat dishes with fruits? I feel the administrator is implementing the agenda of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) by banning beef and provoking the local population.”

Lakshadweep is a UT run by an administrator appointed by the central government.

Only 10 of its 36 islands, which are spread across a 32-square-km area in the Arabian Sea, are inhabited.

Muslims account for over 95 percent of the islands’ 70,000-strong population. Kerala, the closest Indian state, is 240 km away.

Since India’s independence in 1947, the archipelago administration was overseen by a bureaucrat until December last year, when the ruling BJP government, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, appointed Patel as its administrator.

Patel was Modi’s home minister in the western Indian state of Gujarat before Modi became prime minister in 2014.

In the five months since taking up his position, Patel has announced a series of decisions that have sparked controversy.

These include a proposed ban on the slaughter of cows and the consumption of beef across the archipelago; a draft legislation that would disqualify people with more than two children from contesting local elections; and the introduction in January of the Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, a draconian law under which individuals can be detained, without any public disclosure, for up to a year.

Another contentious proposal from his office is the Lakshadweep Development Authority Regulation 2021, a draft law that gives the administrator the power to remove or relocate islanders from their properties if required by planning or development activities.

The proposals led to widespread discontent, with experts saying the latest reforms are a “cultural attack” on the Muslim majority region.

“Lakshadweep residents are 100 percent meat-eaters. Their eating habits have evolved over generations. It is a cultural attack. Forced vegetarianism is part of the right-wing Hindu majoritarian agenda,” K. A. Shaji, a political analyst in Kerala, told Arab News.

Several also questioned the closure of dairy farms.

“The only plausible reason for this closure is that the administrator wants to promote dairy products at the cost of locals,” former chief of the local administration, Hassan Bodumukka, from the Minicoy island, told Arab News.

In its counter-affidavit submitted to the KHC, the administration said it wanted to close the two government-run dairy farms because they were “suffering losses and catered to only a few people.”

Bodumukka rejected the argument, claiming that poor economic returns were an issue across all sectors.

“Tell me which government enterprise is running in profit — be it railways or airways or any other ventures — they are meant to serve people, not to earn a profit,” the former provincial councillor said.

He accused authorities of a “hidden agenda” for pushing through with the reforms.

“Since it’s a Muslim majority area and we all know the anti-minority agenda of the BJP. They just want to consolidate majoritarian politics at the cost of the people of the island,” Bodumukka added.

Dr. Koya agreed, adding that “people would challenge these changes,” which “threaten” the islands’ identity.

“We will go up to the Supreme Court to defend the identity of the islands. We will fight with all our strength to save it,” he said.


UK Starmer calls for ‘calm discussion’ to avert trade war with US over Greenland

Updated 2 sec ago
Follow

UK Starmer calls for ‘calm discussion’ to avert trade war with US over Greenland

LONDON: British Prime Minister Keir Starmer called on Monday for ​calm discussion to avert a possible trade war with the United States over Greenland, appealing to President Donald Trump to respect alliances such as NATO rather than undermine them.
All but ruling out retaliatory levies against the United States if Trump carried out his threat to impose tariffs on imports from Britain and seven other countries unless the US was allowed to buy Greenland, Starmer sought to de-escalate the war of words.
He used an early morning
press conference
to set out what he described as the values underpinning his approach toward Trump, ‌which has been ‌criticized by opposition politicians for being too weak, by ‌saying “pragmatic ⁠does ​not mean being ‌passive.”

STARMER SAYS TARIFFS SHOULD NOT BE USED AGAINST ALLIES
After telling Trump that his threatened tariffs were wrong on Sunday, Starmer doubled down to say he would use “the full strength of government” to try to stop the US decision, one, he said, that could only hurt already stretched households.
“Tariffs should not be used against allies in this way,” Starmer said, adding that he was not looking to escalate a tariff war at this point.
“A tariff war is in ⁠nobody’s interests, and we have not got to that stage. And my focus, therefore, is making sure we don’t get ‌to that stage.”
Trump threatened tariffs on imports from the ‍eight countries which sent small numbers of military ‍personnel to Greenland last week, following Trump’s repeated statements he wanted to take over Denmark’s ‍vast Arctic island to ensure US security.
Starmer said he
told Trump
on Sunday those forces were “clearly there to assess and work on risk from the Russians.” He said he hoped that there was now “real clarity” about that.
The British prime minister signalled his approach would differ from that of the European Union, ​which has discussed options to respond, including a
package of tariffs
on 93 billion euros ($107.7 billion) of US imports.
Instead, he said, Britain should work to nurture ⁠a relationship with the United States that was crucial for UK security, intelligence and defense, while disagreeing with the tariff threat and working diplomatically to avert it.
Starmer said the threats risked causing a “downward spiral” for Britain, in terms of trade and the weakening of alliances.
“I do not want to see that happen,” he said, but he added: “That doesn’t mean that we put to one side our principles and our values. Quite the contrary, we’re very clear about what they are.”
Starmer has built a solid relationship with Trump and in May last year he became the first leader to secure a deal to lower some tariffs.
Asked if he thought Trump was genuinely considering
military action, Starmer said: “I don’t, actually. I think that this can be resolved and should ‌be resolved through calm discussion.”